Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Outbursts by Terror Suspect at a Competency Hearing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Coventina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 09:07 AM
Original message
Outbursts by Terror Suspect at a Competency Hearing
Source: New York Times

Aafia Siddiqui, a Pakistani neuroscientist accused of trying to kill American soldiers and F.B.I. agents in Afghanistan, repeatedly interrupted a hearing on Monday about her competency to stand trial. She declared in a series of rambling, often disjointed outbursts that she had not shot anyone and was not against the United States.

“I didn’t fire any bullets,” she said at one point.

“I’m really not against America. I never was. I still am not,” she said later.

During the hearing in Federal District Court in Manhattan, psychological experts differed on whether Ms. Siddiqui had faked symptoms of mental illness or suffered from a genuine mental disorder, and if she was competent to stand trial.

But as the experts vied to talk about her mental state, it was Ms. Siddiqui who seemed to be most intent on getting in the first and last words, and many in between.

“I’m not psychotic — I can assure you I am not,” she said in a discourse after the cross-examination of a psychologist who had concluded that she was suffering from mental illness and was not competent to stand trial.



Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/07/nyregion/07competency.html?ref=global-home
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Piewhacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. This is a serious problem for the US government. And it stinks.
This is the lady who was shot while in custody.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aafia_Siddiqui

Here, it is usually the defense attorney claiming the defendant is
not competent. It avoids a trial, but the defendant remains in custody
and may be subject to involuntary treatment of various kinds
(psychotropic drugs, shock treatment...)

We could of course wonder why the government is
turning the law on its head to challenge her competence, but then
in light of a bungled "war on terror" (which had nothing at all
to do with terrorists and was actually intended to terrorize
populations into accepting a police state by arresting
and torturing 'confessions' out of political enemies) it all
begins to seem pretty obvious. n'est pas?

I'd start with hanging 2/3 of the CIA. No, start with 2/3 of the
politicians. No... oh, crap... where to begin???? How about the
Bush Administration? Bushco. Hey, its a start!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC