Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rove deposed (Earlier Today) in U.S. attorney probe

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 07:18 PM
Original message
Rove deposed (Earlier Today) in U.S. attorney probe
Edited on Tue Jul-07-09 07:19 PM by kpete
Source: Politico

Rove deposed in U.S. attorney probe

Former White House Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove was deposed Tuesday by attorneys for the House Judiciary Committee, according to Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.), the panel’s chairman.

Rove’s deposition began at 10 a.m. and ended around 6:30 p.m, with several breaks, Conyers said.

Conyers would not comment on what Rove told congressional investigators, what the next step in the long-running Judiciary Committee investigation would be or whether Rove would face additional questioning.

“He was deposed today,” Conyers said in an interview. “That’s all I can tell you.”

Conyers’ panel had first subpoenaed Rove in 2007 as part of its probe into the firing of nine U.S. attorneys. But the Bush White House, citing executive privilege, refused to make Rove or White House
Counsel Harriet Miers available for any deposition.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0709/24668.html#ixzz0Kcei8T0w&D


Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0709/24668.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nothing will come of it
Bank that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissDeeds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
29. Agreed
Was he under oath? No matter. He'll whiz all over the Bible. After all, he helped shred the Constitution. :thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
32. Now wait a minute
They will surely send him a strongly worded letter. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. lol n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipi_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #32
51. And in a fit of pique, they will probably
add a scathing Mea Culpa at the end of that letter.


That will show him!!!!!


:+

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
42. That's a FACT, just as surely as the sun will rise tomorrow.
If anyone in a position to do anything actually CARED
about the (heh heh heh) LAW, Karl Rove would have been in prison
years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. was he under oath? If so, there's no way he talked all day without lying
were transcripts kept, or was this one of those "friendly chats" with no records, no oath, no teeth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subcomhd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. no kidding
"Rove’s deposition began at 10 a.m. and ended around 6:30 p.m"

No way he didn't tell some big fat ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanity Claws Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Depositions are necessarily under oath and
Court reporters take down verbatim what is said. I am assuming that the term deposition was correctly used.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wroberts189 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. But if the term was correctly used he was under oath? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanity Claws Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wroberts189 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. Well thats a glimmer of hope thx. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #23
46. Only if you believe taking an oath actually means anything to him. The law
certainly meant nothing. Hatch Act?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wroberts189 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #46
53. You are right on the money. Thats why I said "glimmer" nt :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
22. The oath doesn't much matter. The transcript does.
It's kinda illegal to lie to Congress even when yoiu're not under oath, but you need the transcript to nail down the lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlbertCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #22
34. It's kinda illegal to lie to Congress
Edited on Tue Jul-07-09 10:50 PM by AlbertCat
Hey....it's kinda illegal to torture people to death, but no one who ordered that has gotten in trouble for it.


Still it'll be interesting to see what was said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #22
47. Hard to prove that a witness is lying about his recollection. "As far as I
can recall right now...." "I don't have a present recollection of those events." "That's privileged information."

And so on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lint Head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. Pig Boy will get away with the murder of our country.
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
howmad1 Donating Member (959 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
41. Crime does pay in the good old USA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. Sing, Karl, Sing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrMickeysMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
36. Yah, but do it in Sing Sing...
... kay?

Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
santamargarita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. My guess is he told the truth...
zero times
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wroberts189 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. True ..every word out of his mouth has always been lies. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. Too bad they didn't book him afterwards.
He needs to do life in prison along with the rest of the BushCo criminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiaCulpa Donating Member (741 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. Rove deposed — over eight hour period — in US Attorney firings
Source: Raw Story - John Byrne

Judiciary Chairman won’t comment on what was asked, said

Former Bush White House Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove was deposed by lawyers for the House Judiciary Committee, Judiciary Chairman John Conyers (D-MI) said in an interview Tuesday.

Rove’s deposition took place over a period of some eight and a half hours, beginning at 10 a.m. and ending around 6:30 p.m, ET — and the lawyers took several breaks, Conyers said.

Conyers wouldn’t say what Rove told investigators or whether Rove would appear before his committee again.

Read more: http://rawstory.com/08/news/2009/07/07/rove-deposed-us-attorney/



Don't know what to make of it. <shrugs>

-Diane
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I am betting most of his responses were
"I don't recall, I don't remember, I have no recollection...."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wroberts189 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. The bad memory excuse.. this "out of jail free card" bs has got to stop.


do not remember? polygraph time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. better late than never, I guess.
but it certainly is LATE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
12. He probably chose today on purpose
so that he's get no coverage whatsoever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suzanner Donating Member (396 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
13. Many breaks? Hope they checked for needle tracks,
did toxicology blood samples, and kept a lie detector on him. Did he meet with his 'people' in these breaks? Oh, yeah, it's congress. Conyers is good but someone else pulls the strings apparently. We can't spend the money to find out who robbed us of and in our country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wroberts189 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
14. He FINALLY showed up after ignoring all the subpoenas? Under oath?

articles do not say what "conditions" if any...


snip:

Conyers’ panel had first subpoenaed Rove in 2007 as part of its probe into the firing of nine U.S. attorneys. But the Bush White House, citing executive privilege, refused to make Rove or White House Counsel Harriet Miers available for any deposition.

Conyers’ panel responded by filing a civil lawsuit against the White House and prevailed in district court last year but the appeals court had yet to address the issue.

With an agreement between the Obama White House, the Bush White House and House Judiciary Committee, the current Justice Department avoided having to choose sides in court and risk an appeals court precedent which could undercut executive privilege or Congress's right to investigate alleged government malfeasance.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0709/24668.html#ixzz0KczeG7Th&D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clear eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #14
49. My guess is that "conditions" included not being asked what Bush & Cheney knew.
Edited on Wed Jul-08-09 10:43 AM by clear eye
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
R. P. McMurphy Donating Member (394 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
15. "A journey of a thousand miles . .
begins with a single step."

Let's hope this is one of many thousands of small cracks that eventually make the wall come tumbling down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
18. K&R'd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomm2thumbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
21. Baked Potato /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
24. Good news! Only question now is when will Rove's DU pal
Edited on Tue Jul-07-09 08:55 PM by Kingofalldems
show and bring up the Truthout story for the umpteenth time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
25. " So, Karl. How've you been? Ever get that knee worked on? Kids good?"
Sorry,but I've heard too many times how Conyers was going to go after the B* admin, for the war and the stealing of the elections.

Wake me up when something real happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
26. I wonder if they noticed that he had his fingers crossed behind his back. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mark olson Donating Member (33 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
27. NYT calls it an "interview"; I think "deposed" is an overstatement
July 7, 2009, 9:19 pm
Rove Is Interviewed in Judiciary Panel Inquiry
By The New York Times
Karl Rove, the senior political adviser to President George W. Bush, was interviewed in a closed session on Tuesday by investigators for the House Judiciary Committee about his role in the dismissal of nine federal prosecutors in December 2006, a person briefed on the matter said on Tuesday.

Mr. Rove had been expected to answer the committee’s questions under an agreement reached after nearly two years of legal wrangling over his testimony,

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Welcome to DU!
Who knows, maybe something will come of it. :) nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oilwellian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #27
40. Interesting...NYT is quoting Rove's lawyer
Luskin called it an "interview" as well yet Conyers said he was deposed. So who to believe?

The agreement reached with Conyers last March:

The House Judiciary Committee announced late Wednesday afternoon that they had secured the agreement of former White House Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove and former White House Counsel Harriet Miers to testify in transcribed depositions under threat of perjury.

The Committee did not immediately announce what terms, if any, had been reached with Rove, but said the agreement had been made with representatives of the former Bush Administration.

They did say that they would get access to Administration documents, and that Rove and Miers had agreed to testify publicly if called. But the announcement left open the possibility that Rove and Miers could testify in private.

"The Committee has also reserved the right to have public testimony from Rove and Miers," House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers (D-MI) said in a statement.


http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Rove_agrees_to_testify_under_oath_0304.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
30. I hope he was under oath
x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
31. Have any of the other BushCo liars pulled time for giving false testimony under oath?
That's what I thought.

This is one of those "for public consumption" moments. Hell, I'm surprised that they even had time for it considering all the "looking forward" that's going on in D.C. nowadays.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mosaic Donating Member (851 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
33. Great News!!!
Make him talk until the entire criminal enterprise is brought down and held up as a lesson to all future rethugs not to fall into the dark side again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pilsner Donating Member (227 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
37. Leura Canary & other Bush U.S. Attorneys still on the job
Apparently, Democratic poo-bahs don't give a shit about Don Siegelman and the other political prisoners Bush/Rove/Gonzales locked up.

No sunshine + no transcript = Soviet justice.

When the Rethuglicans get back power someday and they will, the Dems who are letting Rove off the hook will rue the white wash because many of them will recieve the Rove railroad treatment too.

Wasn't it Holder who projected that, "we're a nation of cowards." ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #37
44. I hope this hearing today will turn Siegelman's case around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caseymoz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
38. Since they didn't make it public testimony under oath, nothing will come of it.

assholes

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
getting older Donating Member (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
39. Whatever happened
to the public stocks? Time to bring them back. Let's not dispose of any toxic waste for a while so we can fling it at him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
43. I wonder if they asked him any questions about the Jackson tragedy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oldtimeralso Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
45. Satan Cannot Take An Oath On A Bible. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
48. Rove took care of this when he had the White House use the computers he arranged for
Edited on Wed Jul-08-09 10:36 AM by No Elephants
in violation of record keeping laws.

He can lie through his teeth on this. Or say "I don't recall" seventy different ways.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
50. Was lightning striking in DC every time he lied?
That might explain the hailstorm that knocked out parts of NY yesterday, too ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XXXMADAM Donating Member (116 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
52. Karl Rove and CIA Foggo, DC Madam Palfrey
Edited on Wed Jul-08-09 02:15 PM by XXXMADAM
What is Karl Rove's relation with now imprisoned CIA Dusty Foggo and deseased DC madam Palfrey. Foggo & Cheney both lived in Dallas and Karl Rove was 'Bush's Brain' as both Bush's were running for office at the time - 1993.
At the time I myself, owner of an escort service, was asked by Houston FBI to blackmail politicians via Sex at the same time Palfrey joined Foggo. Also a madam from Alabama (Siegleman case) was imprisoned then found hanging in a federal jail cell in Brazoria County, Tx. (Tom Delay's precinct). A madam in Dallas was given a Life sentence in Bangkok - where U.S. Sex Workers were being targeted and sent to. Madam Brandi Britton was found hanging in Maryland last year.

Prostitution, Blackmail, and Political Corruption
By Agents of the United States

Sex Slavery, Forced Prostitution, Human Trafficking, extortion, blackmail―of the most egregious kind―of U.S. Citizens by the U.S. Government

My name is Robin Head, previous owner of Playboy Escorts in Houston, Texas. I was approached by various law enforcement agency's, FBI, ATF, etc... who wanted me to abet them in entrapping "State and political officials" having sex so they could extort, control and blackmail them, not to charge them with misdemeanor prostitution. At the same time, women at my service were being tricked and trafficked overseas to Bangkok and called me collect from a jail in Vienna.

A madam from Alabama was found hanging in a federal jail cell in nearby Brazoria County. When I refused to abet in the extortion, I was thrown in jail, no bond, a 'Life' sentence filed on me, and then my son and family were harassed and attacked endlessly in some kind of gang like Mafia style.

I went to the FBI, but it was like reporting the devil to the witch, they said they would help me but only if I would help them, again, to set up officials. They had no interest in the corruption aspect. Some very high profile names were involved, people seen on TV news commentary.

Who are these agents with this monstrous agenda and what do they want? This is not a left/right wing thing it is a most vicious entity in this country.

This country has become as fearful as any other 3rd world country when it comes to reporting crime to officials just exactly like in Russia, Iraq, Africa, Mexico, etc... where it is the officials that are the perpetrators of the crimes, kidnapping, ransom, drugs, and it is dangerous to report to them.

http://fbicorruption.250free.com

http://www.defraudingamerica.com/robin_head.html






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC