Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Burner Helping House Liberals Hold Firm on Public Insurance Option (Liberals Bloc "Isn't Bluffing")

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 01:49 PM
Original message
Burner Helping House Liberals Hold Firm on Public Insurance Option (Liberals Bloc "Isn't Bluffing")
Source: Roll Call


Burner Helping House Liberals Hold Firm on Public Insurance Option
By Tory Newmyer
Roll Call Staff
Aug. 31, 2009, 12:01 a.m.


An organizer for liberal House Democrats says the bloc “isn’t bluffing” as it prepares to take a reputation-defining stand to protect a public insurance option in the health care overhaul.

Darcy Burner, executive director of the American Progressive Caucus Policy Foundation, said the health care debate has rallied traditionally disparate Congressional liberals to hang together, while galvanizing support for their position from an array of left-leaning outside groups. The result, she said, is that Democratic leaders will not be able to clear a package through the House if it does not include the public plan.

“We have never had the Progressive Caucus organized the way it is right now,” Burner said during a Friday roundtable with Roll Call. “This is not the normal scenario. And Speaker Nancy Pelosi D-Calif. knows it.”

The public insurance provision has sparked a game of rhetorical chicken between, on the one hand, liberals who have pegged it as essential and, on the other, moderate Democrats and some White House officials, who have called it a deal-killer in the Senate and diminished its importance to broader reform.

Read more: http://www.rollcall.com/news/38051-1.html?CMP=OTC-RSS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dana_b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. k&r
glad they are sticking together
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
31. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. 
[link:www.democraticunderground.com/forums/rules.html|Click
here] to review the message board rules.
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R for the progressive caucus.
They are representing me, thank God.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jannyk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. That's more like it! Go Liberals!!!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FVZA_Colonel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well, even Obama seems to be moving towards a Democrats only bill.
If this happens, it seems much more likely the Progressives could win out in the end, even if it is in a limited form.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Hope it's not _too_ limited.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FVZA_Colonel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Same here.
I do believe, though, that if they go to a Democrats-only version, the Progressive Caucus and other groups like it will have a much stronger voice.

It's not a guarantee, but it's a better chance than what we have right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. I STAND with the Progressive Caucus.
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #5
58. I just joined. Darcy unsuccessifully ran for Congress in Seattle. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #58
64. You're in Congress?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. The repukes and right wing have NEVER done anything for WE the people...
NEVER! They have been there for corporations and the wealthy. That is is folks.

It's time WE the people are represented by our legislators. Enough is enough already. F*ck reagan and his corporate shills. Let's get the steam roller rolling!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
26. I was trying to think of one time -- just ONE time -- they've been on the right side of history.
I couldn't think of anything.

They've stood in the way of every movement and idea intended to better life for the average American, every single time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #26
39. abolishing slavery, but that was an awfully long time ago
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #39
61. Right, but I'd argue that at the time "keep slavery" was the conservative
position, and "abolish slavery" was the liberal position. Republicans were a different breed in Abe's time. The conservatives have NEVER been right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #61
66. I agree with your comment, with that modification.
Edited on Tue Sep-01-09 01:56 PM by No Elephants
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #26
65. Abe Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
44. Believe it or not, this isn't about the Republicans. This is about DEMOCRATS getting a spine,
and sticking together.

A totally different thing.

Call your Rep!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chknltl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #44
54. I see it different still
To me this is We The People vs We The corporatists. Presently we have the best government money can purchase. We The People are the underdogs in purchase power, the corporatists who are spending OUR WEALTH on OUR GOVERNMENT have us beat when it comes to purchase power. We The People are not spending 1.4 million a day to sway our government to our needs. From what I understand, the corporatists are spending that sum daily. Money talks BS walks in DC.

OTOH and IMO, the corporatists do not have our voting power, well at least not yet. If they did, our POTUS would not be Barrack Obama. If they were unconcerned about our voting power they would not be spending all that money lobbying our Congress-(again IMO).

So there is the balance, can We The People tip things our way, (read that as saving democracy) or will the corporatists tip things their way, (read that as the death of democracy and the rise to overwhelming power of corporate fascism). In essence I see this as a class struggle between democracy and corporate fascism. Who will ultimately control our government?

What I see is not so much as ANYONE needing to grow a spine, what I see is the decision making of members of the U.S. Government deciding who they wish to represent. Each member must decide on every single vote: 'Do I represent the folks who pay me the most money or do I represent those who voted me into office?' Which group will guarantee my re-election the best?

Clearly the members of the Republican side of the House and Senate have made their choice, they were bought off looooong ago. The supporters of the republican party, (their base) was by and large oblivious to this takeover of their party. They keep turning out to support their supposed reps but their numbers shrink as more and more come to realize that those reps don't really represent them. For example: How did the repeal of Roe V Wade work out under the bush regime for those single issue repuke voters? How about those repuke supporters who went bankrupt because of health-care reasons?

The corporatists saw the writing on the wall years ago. They've been worming their way into the Democratic side more and more as the Democrats took power. Fortunately their investments into our Democratic Party have not gone so unnoticed. Progressives are calling them out, pulling back the curtain to reveal who has been bought and paid for by whom. We see this in the DU for example. There are the occasional threads revealing which blue dog is paid by which corporatist in the Health care industry. (Btw not to piss anyone off, but I was in strong opposition to Senator Clinton's bid for President because of her immense support from the Military Industrial Complex).

This IMO is what sets many of us Progressive members of the blogosphere above those who can't spend much time online. We are beginning to grasp that our government, America's very democracy is being bought out from under us. It is a hostile takeover on a massive scale. Can we get the word out in time to enough of the voters to stop this? Can we convince our fellow Americans, Americans on BOTH SIDES of the political aisle that there is much MUCH more at stake here than getting Health Care Reform passed???? Well that remains to be seen now doesn't it.

Truth be told, it's not our politicians who need a spine, it is instead the electorate that needs enlightenment. We still hold enough power to make a difference...but just barely.

Sorry for the rant...it just sorta came out on it's own
:pals:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #54
59. yup nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #54
62. You have't expressed anything I would disagree with, so no need for the "sorry".
I was speaking back to those who keep saying it's about the Republicans.

It's just as much about the Dems. And if we don't come to that conclusion very soon, there will be no HOPE.

:pals: back atcha!

My hope is pretty threadbare, so I appreciate the hug!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #54
68. I'm not sure progressive voters can really make a difference anymore. Corporatists
are in both parties, or, rather in both sections of the Republicrat Party. IMO, we can make our biggest impact by voting third party, much as, IMO, voting for Ross Perot got both sides focused on the deficit and on fiscal responsiblity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #44
67. Not to brag, but my rep is a member of the Progressive Caucus and a co-sponsor of HR 676. So,
Edited on Tue Sep-01-09 02:20 PM by No Elephants
I keep writing to thank him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #67
70. I'm glad to hear that. I'mm not sure how that refutes my point... or if you were even replying to
me at all.

While I'm happy for you, surely you don't think that we don't have a major problem with the Corporist Dems?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. k&r for the Honorable Members of the Progressive Caucus. n/t
:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
offog Donating Member (263 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. Right on!
Edited on Mon Aug-31-09 05:19 PM by offog
I hope the Members of the Progressives and the good folks out in Blogland keep up the pressure. Tell the President not to wimp out on the public option. Ya gotta have that! I absolute do not trust the private insurers to do the right thing by patients unless that public option competition is there.

Get out there and bash those Republican talking points. Public health care does not mean government bureaucrats "standing between you and your doctor", okay? I'm a fifty-year-old Canadian woman, and I've never had any bureaucrat interfere in any of my health care decisions.

We don't have "Death Panels". If someone WANTS a "do-not-resuscitate" order, they can get one. If you DON'T WANT that, nobody's going to force it on you. End of life planning, to my mind, is as routine and necessary as making sure you have a will. It's a matter of making your wishes clear so that you don't get doctors and relatives having to guess at what you want, or, worse yet, getting into legal disputes over it.

And that argument that private insurance companies can't compete with a public option, and will go out of business? Well, my initial gut reaction is, "Tuff sh*t! If you weren't charging sky-high prices for cruddy service, you wouldn't be in this spot!" But the private insurers won't go out of business. They can still provide supplementary coverage. That's what Canadian private insurance companies do.

Keep up the fight, everybody!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #18
28. Tuff sh*t is my gut reaction too.
I plan to send letters to the Caucus urging them to stand firm.

If they fail, my family and I may be joining you soon.

:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
regnaD kciN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
10. Damn! I wish she'd been elected our Congressperson...
...instead of Dave "Third" Reichart. :grr:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
martymar64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. I hope she eventually replaces Cantwell in the Senate
Now, THAT would be sweet!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
38. That was a missed opportunity for sure.
Darcy is the real thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #38
69. She just may be more effective doing what she is doing than she could be if she were a Rep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 04:58 AM
Response to Reply #10
55. I helped out some on the last campaign, though I'm in the 7th
The way she has taken to this new role, however, makes me think that maybe she was supposed to be a policy wonk all along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
11. Recommended for some Democrats who are finally fighting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
12. K & R
:party: :bounce: :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaPera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
13. Fuck no they are NOT - Nor should they!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaPera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
14. !
Edited on Mon Aug-31-09 05:00 PM by LaPera
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
15. Atta girl, Darcy!
Gee, TWO active fighters for reform (The Billionaires being the first) show up in one day. Could this possibly be a turning point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
16. Full support!
I hope this thread garners hundreds of rec's. It's what we've all been waiting for.

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
19. It's about freakin' time!!! Stand up for yourselves and us! What a concept!
Thank you, thank you, thank you!! We have your back, now and at election time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subcomhd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
20. We will get a PO
The progressives are starting to catch a their second wind and the freaksters shot their wad with the Town Hall, gun-toting spectacles. Labor is starting to show some teeth too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GrantDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
21. Stand strong Progressives.
Edited on Mon Aug-31-09 05:48 PM by GrantDem
I sent an email to the Progressive Caucus encouraging them to do so and thanking them a few weeks ago. Looks like it's time for another thank you.

http://cpc.grijalva.house.gov/index.cfm?SectionID=15&ParentID=0&SectionTypeID=5&SectionTree=15
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Thanks for the link
Just sent them a 'thank you' note.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eagertolearn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #21
35. I tried to submit a letter but it said there was an error with their de-bugger or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #35
46. Here are the toll-free numbers for ya
Toll-free Capitol Hill Numbers:


1-800-828-0498 1-866-388-1015 1-866-220-0044 1-877-851-6437
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #21
45. Here are the toll-free Capitol Hill numbers, too!
Toll-free Capitol Hill Numbers:


1-800-828-0498 1-866-388-1015 1-866-220-0044 1-877-851-6437

I'm calling my thanks tomorrow!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
22. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
23. This is for the SOUL of the Democratic party /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
25. Please guys and dolls do not bend. Stand up for what is right. You have
given the powers plenty of warning; now they need to heed it or else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jakes Progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
27. God bless them, every single one. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Krashkopf Donating Member (965 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
29. Thank you AGGRESSIVE PROGRESSIVES!
I am on you side! No Public Option = No deal!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stevepol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
30. W/o the PO it wouldn't change anything and could easily be worse.
I say no to anything w/o the PO.

If they want to pass a couple of the minor provisions that might help on the margins, go ahead, but don't call it health care REFORM. Just call whatever minor issue it is. If they're not tied to a larger bill, there are quite a few minor improvements that could be made. That's fine with me, BUT NO HEALTH CARE REFORM BILL W/O THE PUBLIC OPTION.

Without the PO,
it's no go,
I say NO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
32. Good, as the Republicans leave the table and the Progressives hold firm
It will soon become clear that there is only way to 218 and 51.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
33. THANK YOU!!!!
:applause::woohoo: :applause::woohoo: :applause::woohoo: :applause::woohoo: :applause::woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
34. Burner says: "Be cool, my babies" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
36. Great Stuff
Imagine - insisting on actual change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
37. Have a liberal voting bloc is such a beautiful thing
I love seeing this headline. Things are slowly changing in Washington.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
40. Thanks for the link. I e-mailed the Progressives my support and gratitude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
41. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
42. That's only half the story
Edited on Mon Aug-31-09 08:40 PM by ProSense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoccoR5955 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
43. K & R... No Surrender, No Retreat
TeddyCare for ALL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happygoluckytoyou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
47. news flash.... IN A SURPRIZING DEVELOPMENT...using stem cells....DEMOCRATS GROW BALLS ! ! !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beartracks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #47
51. LOL Here's a similar shirt...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #47
60. ay cajones! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetroxie Donating Member (152 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
48. Go Darcy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
49. Proudly supporting the Progressive Caucus!! Go Darcy!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
50. good for them!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
puebloknot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
52. Good. Now don't insult with a "Roman Circus" of "co-ops" ...
... which have no power and would just be a distraction, poorly understood by John/Jane Q. Citizen until too late.

We need a STRONG PUBLIC OPTION!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
53. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 05:29 AM
Response to Original message
56. There's that decepetive term "moderate" again
Edited on Tue Sep-01-09 05:29 AM by depakid
The accurate word here is conservative or -corrupt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
57. No PUBLIC OPTION, NO DEAL!!!
Don't like it, you Vichy DINOS, and all you Right Wing Dem tools here, TOUGH SHIT!!!

If we don't do it NOW, it will NEVER get done!!!

I say it's GOD DAMNED ABOUT TIME!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
63. I think I like this woman....
"She said she saw a gap between liberal lawmakers and what should be a ready-made base for them in likeminded grass-roots organizations that were too narrowly focused on electoral politics instead of governing."

Hello!

"An early experiment this spring confirmed for her the potential power of the linkage. She solicited the net roots for questions to put to Progressives that they would answer on the House floor, live on C-SPAN, during the group’s weekly “special orders” session on Thursday nights. Burner said she expected a couple thousand people to participate, but in the first four weeks, 60,000 people weighed in. "

Hello!


"The group’s organizational strength faces its most serious test this fall, and Burner acknowledged it is incumbent on liberals to convince the White House it will have an easier time getting a bill through the Senate with a public insurance option than getting one through the House without one.

“If Progressives aren’t willing to do the work to make the president do the right thing, it’s unlikely he will,” she said."

Hello!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC