Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate Votes To Deny Funds To ACORN

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 06:57 PM
Original message
Senate Votes To Deny Funds To ACORN
Source: Associated Press

(AP) — WASHINGTON - The Senate voted Monday to block the Housing and Urban Development Department from giving grants to ACORN, a community organization under fire in several voter-registration fraud cases.

The 83-7 vote would deny housing and community grant funding to ACORN, which stands for the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now.

DEVELOPING...

Read more: http://www.cleveland.com/newsflash/index.ssf?/base/national-9/1252970691228910.xml&storylist=washington
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. ACORN really
fucked up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It was all those Mickey Mouses and Donald Ducks showing up at the polls
that really tilted the election for Obama, doncha know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. 3 separate offices fell for that act. Pretty sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carl Skan Donating Member (208 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Numerous offices called it what it was prior to the few the fell for it.
Why ACORN didn't send a notice about what was going to to each local office is beyond me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dr_aswan Donating Member (34 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
23. It should not take a memo to know not to give a pimp a loan..
Edited on Mon Sep-14-09 08:11 PM by dr_aswan
If I was a professional loan agent, and someone sent a memo telling me not to give loans to people posing as pimps and prostitutes I think I would be offended...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 06:53 AM
Response to Reply #23
46. What loan? I thought it was advice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 06:51 AM
Response to Reply #9
45. Maybe ACORN did not know until the Baltimore story hit the fan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #9
70. Kind of a weak excuse
Edited on Tue Sep-15-09 08:50 AM by JonQ
We couldn't be expected to perform well on this secret ethics investigation because we weren't warned in advance that there would be a secret ethics investigation that we should behave for.

Like saying : well officer if I'd known you were checking how fast people were going then obviously I wouldn't have been speeding, this ticket is your fault!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carl Skan Donating Member (208 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #70
75. It's not an excuse
It's a questioning of incompetence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 06:50 AM
Response to Reply #4
44. Baltimore and D.C. are the only ones that I know of. As to NY, the information is conflicting, to
say the least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dizzykitty Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
140. Wanna Know Why???
....Because hardly anyone was covering the story! If these Acorn "employees" had kept up with the current news, they would've seen it coming a mile away! And for the record, they're up to 4 videos. This last one shows a woman confessing to murdering her husband!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
24601 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Yep, screwed the pooch and killed the goose that could have
laid them the golden eggs. And they are OUT of the 2010 census. Unless something new & unexpected happens on the level of a real game-changer, Acorn have become toxic assets, make that toxic liabilities, in the political sense. In other than the safest seats imaginable, no politicians can be seen supporting them.

A name change may be in order.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grassy Knoll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Wow that was so spot on...
Obama hired Robert Groves to the census bureau to squash this negative ammunition .
Great job 24601 !!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 06:55 AM
Response to Reply #6
47. How did ACORN screw the pooch? I don't mean some dumb employees. I mean ACORN
Edited on Tue Sep-15-09 06:57 AM by No Elephants
itself. How did it screw the pooch? BTW, NOTHING has been proven yet against the employees and there is not even an allegation that ACORN encouraged that kind of behavior by its employees. So, you might want to take a breath before leaping to your next unwarranted conclusion.

Name change? You mean like Halliburton and Blackwater? What a typically Republican "solution."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
24601 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #47
131. One ACORN office is a bad employee. Two bad offices are
a coincidence. Three is a pattern. And with four (so far) it's hard to believe the public won't infer it's in the ACORN ethos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evensteven007 Donating Member (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #47
155. public opinion matters
well fella, one can conclude from all the outrage, stemming from both sides, ACORN has screwed the pooch when it comes to its eternal free pass. no elephants....nice. the rebuke to that would be what?.....no jack asses???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #47
159. You got it - typical REPUBLICAN Solution. Except, in this case, the advice is being given
by someone not really interested in ACORN surviving in the same way a Blackwater does with a name change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarthPortnoy Donating Member (153 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Excuse me...
But I will reserve judgement until they show the unedited version of those tapes. These people were set up and the "filmmaker" was breaking the law.

Thousands of needy people will now go without because of the conservatives, this crook "filmmaker" and the racist teabaggers who support this type of behavior.

I urge you to make a donation to ACORN today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carl Skan Donating Member (208 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Cite the law
The specific law, not some "you cannot tape people without them knowing" fantasy.

60 Minutes would have been off the air within weeks of their first episode if that were true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Maryland's wiretapping law
which Ken Starr conveniently overlooked so Linda Tripp wouldn't have to go to jail for secretly taping Monica Lewinsky.

From the OP's link:
On the hidden camera controversy, ACORN says it has fired the employees involved but has lashed out at Fox for pumping up the scandal. In a statement, Bertha Lewis, ACORN's chief organizer, said the tapes had been doctored and violated Maryland's wiretapping laws. She promised to sue Fox.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #12
94. Then they need to bring suit
AND be very loud about it. Threatening to do it is meaningless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
24601 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #94
130. You can always bring a suit; however, the judge and jury would
have to agree that they were wronged - and that the law provides a remedy. The common maxim is "He (she) who seeks equity must do equity." The more ACORN keeps their advice to assist running a brothel with underage undocumented girls, while evading taxes, the more it keeps their bad advice, and lack of outrage at the proposals, in the public eye - so the more they have to lose.

Maryland, DC, New York and now Los Angeles. First they were toast and now the toast is burning. Where is next?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 07:00 AM
Response to Reply #10
48. Fantasy? LOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelly1mm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
25. Perhaps in MD, but not in DC or NY. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 07:17 AM
Response to Reply #25
54. AP says the Rethugs did NOT succeed in NY and you are wrong about the law anyway.
Edited on Tue Sep-15-09 07:25 AM by No Elephants
NY--http://wings.buffalo.edu/law/bclc/web/NewYork/ny3(b).htm

D.C. http://www.rcfp.org/taping/states/dc.html

What basis did you have for claiming otherwise?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelly1mm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #54
92. My basis is that DC and NY are one party consent states.
Per your links, D.C. Code Ann. § 23-542 and N.Y. Penal Law §§ 250.00, 250.05 allows anyone who is a party to the conversation to record it- commonly known as "one party consent". What is your basis for saying otherwise?

What do you mean by "did not succeed"? The NY tape was not as bad as the Baltimore or DC tape but did possibly suggest mortgage fraud and tax evasion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
30. Acorn fired those peple. I will
NOT donate to Acorn. Ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 07:37 AM
Response to Reply #30
58. Way to show the Rethugs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #58
91. If this was a Repub. organization you
would be hollering bloody murder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #91
101. On what post(s) of mine do you base that? Please see Reply 98.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #101
105. Fair enough. I apologize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stevepol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
37. Amen.
What I heard was that this sting was tried twice before they found one that fell for the bait.

I don't get it. What has ACORN done? Can any organization do what they've done and not have a handful of people (out of the 13,000 they hired) end up being jerks? And then ACORN itself turned the crooks in.

Why is nobody in Congress standing up for ACORN?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evensteven007 Donating Member (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
135. set up? no way
these "racist tea baggers" are 20 and 25 years old, and caught Acorn with their pants down. i urge you to open your eyes and see the problem with a federal funded agency with these types of alarming issues............Barney Frank voted to stop the funding, that should tell you a lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 06:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
43. How? By hiring people for minimum wage?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #43
107. What are
you talking about? What's your point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
104. Wrong. The Senate, aka America's Crazy Uncles, is a bunch of cowards.
Edited on Tue Sep-15-09 02:37 PM by EFerrari
If we have to defund organizations for the behavior of a few individuals, let's start with the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #104
112. No, let's start with the military
Obviously the soldiers who rape and murder are just proof that they are all monsters. :sarcasm:

This is kind of a broad brush they are using. ACORN is politically dead meat no matter what they do. It is nothing more than a Republican witch-hunt. So the Senate must bend over backwards to accommodate them? Is there no one in government willing to stand up to Republican smear tactics? I thought Obama was a fighter but he hasn't stood up to the Republicans on ANYTHING. I have had it with these spineless weasels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
115. DID YOU READ THE FUCKING ARTICLE??? (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #115
121. Yes I read the fucking article
so what's your FUCKING point? Huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #121
122. Acorn didn't "fuck up"
Edited on Tue Sep-15-09 07:04 PM by ProudDad
A couple of people who allegedly "worked for Acorn" got caught in a sting operation (or posed for a video)...

faux-noise edited it to their liking and trumped up another anti-Acorn screed...

And the cowardly Dems in the Senate ate it up like yesterdays dog poop...

And caved in again to the fascist right...

And so, apparently, did you...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #122
128. I've got a nice bridge
for sale. It's in Brooklyn. Have some more Kool-Aid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-16-09 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #128
144. Hey, with "democrats" like you
who needs republicans...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-16-09 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #144
146. Aren't you
clever? Now run along and play.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prostomulgus Donating Member (188 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. THOSE TAPES broke the law!!!!
They were made without the subjects' knowledge which is a crime, they were specifically targeted against blacks in violation of their civil rights, they were blatant entrapment. Where is the prosecution of those who made the tapes? Why isn't Faux News not shut down over this already?

Why harm a great organization that has done so much good for so many disadvantaged people?

I really hope that the President can intervene and stop this repuke-led stampede against one of the few groups that truly stands up for the little guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. "They were made without the subjects' knowledge which is a crime,"
Are you serious? Have you ever watched 60 minutes, Dateline, etc.?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fastcars Donating Member (121 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. 60 Minutes...
or Dateline's "To Catch a Predator series".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #16
56. Rather than leaping to conclusions based on Dateline, google the law.
Edited on Tue Sep-15-09 07:30 AM by No Elephants
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 07:27 AM
Response to Reply #11
55. Google the laws in Baltimore and D.C. And, for that matter, in the rest of the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Kerry VonErich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. Hey, it's a war on community organizations.
What did you expect?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 07:03 AM
Response to Reply #15
49. It's more of one part of a much larger war on Democrats. And, more recently, on Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
24601 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. It's not really established that any laws were broken. Wiretapping
laws don't come into play because they were recorded in person, not over a communications device and there was no expectation of privacy.

It's not entrapment because they (the tapers) aren't the government and what they did wouldn't meet the criteria for entrapment. And besides, the act itself of doing an entrapment isn't a crime - it's just that it's a legitimate defense against a criminal charge - but that's not an issue here.

There's no identifiable civil rights violation. What right were they denied? Everything they did or said was completely voluntary. There was no violence or threat of violence.

It's over (unless more tapes surface) and the damage is done. The damage is their standing in the court of public opinion and with politicians that could have used them in the census or provided them taxpayer monies.

What comes to mind is that it was a well-executed Information Operation. The only thing that would redeem ACORN is if it comes out that the tapes were faked and they didn't really say what it appears they said. For example if the ACORN worker really said, "Underage prostitutes from another country, sit still asshole, you're under citizens arrest for conspiracy to rape a minor, traffic in illegal immigrants, and operation of a brothel" and the tapers cut all that out and substituted the well-known financial advice on how to evade the IRS, we have a different story. It doesn't, however, look like that at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 07:08 AM
Response to Reply #17
52. Where did you pull all that from? Bc your source, if any, sucks.
Edited on Tue Sep-15-09 07:33 AM by No Elephants
Every bit of that post is wrong, including the part that implies that ACORN needs redemption.

This is a smear effort. Those who are willing to fall for it do fall for it (or pretend to), as do those who are not very bright. That does not mean ACORN needs redemption, unless having facts be known amounts to redemption in your mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
24601 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #52
133. Take it apart, point by point and run it by an attorney if you think
I'm wrong.

Regarding redemption - in politics, perception is reality and if you have missed the blowback than you aren't paying attention. If they are doing OK, then the Senate would not have voted 87-3 to deny them money in FY 2010. Even Chris Dodd supported the cutoff.

I don't care if you are ACORN or the Pope, calmly listen to a business plan to run a whorehouse with underage girls from developing countries (AKA slavery and rape) and give financial advice to evade the IRS and you're in trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
32. You are very mistaken.
For it to be entrapment it would have to involve an agent of the government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #32
57. Right. Otherwise, it's just the garden variety Republican dirty trick.
And "very mistaken" is so much more serious than just "mistaken."

At least you're consistent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
naaman fletcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #3
41. they were specifically targeted against blacks in violation of their civil rights,
Please... do you really think that Faux news wouldn't have kept taping and published the tapes if the ACORN reps that happened to be there were white? Could you cite any possible case law to suggest that this is some sort of actionable civil rights violation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #41
61. Kept taping? Yes. STARTED taping to begin with? Who knows? Did ANY of the .
employees the Rethug duo approached look "white?" As far as a civil rights violation, unless the employees consented to the taping, laws against invading their privacy, a Constitutional and a civil right, were indeed invaded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
naaman fletcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #61
72. ...not true...
Or 60 minutes would have been put out of business a long time ago. There is no angle here whatsoever on this somehow being a crime to have taped them. And even if it was, this is not a court of law. How the "evidence" was gathered is irrelevant to the facts of what happened.

For some reason or another ACORN has/had a huge, huge problem with some of its employees who deal with the public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #72
95. Wrong. I have already posted links to NY law and to a summary of D.C. law when responding to
Edited on Tue Sep-15-09 11:51 AM by No Elephants
another poster. Look at this thread and you will see the links. Maryland law is referenced in the OP. All three say you must have the consent of the other party to a conversation to record it. And that holds true whether the conversation is in person or by electronic means. Look at the statutes. Those I can discuss. I cannot address your conclusions based on watching TV without knowing what went on behind the scenes that was not aired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evensteven007 Donating Member (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #95
136. regardless
the fact of the matter is the content of the tapes.....THE ACORN EMPLOYEES WERE BREAKING THE LAW.......do you feel that its ok for an agency that receives tax payer money to conduct business like this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
100. which would be a good defense for the employees if they are charged with a crime
it isn't really a reason to expect the government to keep funding the organization.

ACORN was set up, but, due to the actions of a few employees, they fell into the trap. Hopefully, the funds will go to another organization that can continue to help the disadvantaged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
123. Trust a thread on DU to degenerate
Edited on Tue Sep-15-09 07:07 PM by ProudDad
into counting the number of angels who can dance on the head of a pin...

What the "law" is (It depends on the what the meaning of "is" is)...

No wonder the Dems are such a circular firing squad...

No wonder the right-wing is running rings around you'all...

The POINT is that you allowed your "representatives" to hose an ally thanks to another right-wing hatchet job...just like Van Jones, etc. etc. etc.

When are the Dems going to grow a fucking spine?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. What a cowardly bunch of shits.
Barring a few, "The Senate" sucks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. What Does the House Say About This?
83 is an unbelievable number. There haven't been any charges against ACORN that stuck. Sounds like sentence first, verdict afterwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
149. They just voted 345-75 to do the same:
House votes to defund ACORN

(AP) – 19 minutes ago

WASHINGTON — The House has voted to deny all federal funding for ACORN, the community organizing group that has been caught up in several scandals.

The House action came several days after the Senate took a similar vote to block the Housing and Urban Development Department from giving grants to ACORN.

Republicans, long critics of the liberal-leaning group that advocates for the poor, led the effort to cut off all federal funds.

California Republican Darrell Issa, who sponsored the measure in the House, says the "scandal surrounding the criminal activities of ACORN have called into question their role in all aspects of government."

more: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jxhq8CPN8LdLntDEDtE5NrEBQ2IgD9AP8BUG3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
14. Same ole same ole. Democrats caving like California sink holes. How about a REAL
review of the organization before you kill it, you corporate-controlled, spineless excuses for human beings?

Did any of you Senators, other than the seven who had the courage to vote FOR the grants, even think to truly evaluate the group, its goals, its performance, and its shortcomings, then, if necessary, recommend some changes as a precondition for funding?

I swear to dog, every frickin' day I am amazed at the condition of the Democratic Congress and the Democratic Party. Where did we go wrong?? When did we forget how to stand up and fight for the things that matter?? Or even just to stand courageously for anything?

I guess that all those hundreds of millions of dollars that get into Democratic coffers can't possibly go toward learning how to combat and defeat Republican tactics?? It's not like it would be hard to do because they are so fucking predictable.

Oh, never mind.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. Enabling and legitimizing the far right. Again
It's as if they never learn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. Let's hope we get that censure resolution
Not holding my breath, though. Why do we as a party police ourselves more than the other party?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. I have no problem with--actually I am in favor of --Democrats policing themselves.
It's the abject cowardice on a grand party level that is so disturbing and discouraging.

It's almost as if they're just paid to pretend like they give a shit, but they really just want to keep getting more corporate money and getting re-elected. Sorta the opiate of the asses.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. Neither do I, but we coddle the RW at the same time
That's not good for the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. Precisely. Nor is it good for the country, which is worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #29
60. How is this Democrats policing themselves? This is the Senate, both Republican and Democrat
punishing a not for profit organization that, according to Fact Check, is also non-partisn, solely on the basis of an apparently doctored video Rethug video. The fact that ACORN works with low income communities does not make it a Democratic organization, anymore than it makes the Salvation Army a Democratic organization.

BTW, let me know how you feel the next time you get "policed" that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #26
62. Please see Reply # 60.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #62
137. Understood
I actually wasn't talking about this particular case in regards to us policing ourselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #14
53. There was a reason the Rethugs chose underage prostitution. It's 100%
toxic. Not that that excuses those who "sentenced" ACORN before a trial. They show all the guts of those who voted for the Iraq and WOT resolutions and the so-called "PATRIOT" Act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #53
71. I agree that choosing child prostiution for their sting was "brilliant"
And throwing illegal immigration in for good measure was the kitchen sink.

It's hard to imagine anything more repellent than the scenario they were describing to the unfazed Acorn workers, who seemed to treat the story with unsurprised nonchalance. It was like an episode of Candid Camera, with the would-be pimp and prostitute going to further and further extremes of perversion and illegality and still just getting matter of fact advice.

I do hope we somehow get all the footage, including the young man and woman being shown the door, lectured, and threatened with police action by Acorn workers who were rightfully disgusted by their shtick, as well as those workers who laughed and realized the entire thing was a sham. Then we can put the entire set of incidents in some kind of context.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #71
96. Good point about the kitchen sink. Undocumented Spanish speaking folk.
The second biggest dog whistle these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #14
124. Thank you!
It's nice to know one is not alone...

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-16-09 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #14
142. I have to say you are right
If it had been the other way round, the Repukes would have brazenly continued the funding.

Dems do the "right" thing. Repukes brazenly do wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diane in sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
18. disgusting behavior in the senate, business as usual
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
19. ...and the seven are:
Burris (D-IL)
Casey (D-PA)
Durbin (D-IL)
Gillibrand (D-NY)
Leahy (D-VT)
Sanders (I-VT)
Whitehouse (D-RI)

Good for them! Even Boxer voted yes on this thing!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whirlygigspin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. I think it's time to nail the weasels
FCC purge of the public airwaves
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evensteven007 Donating Member (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #22
150. freedom of speech??
the only media outlet the demys don't control and of course YOU want to silence that......god forbid there is a voice of opposition, a different view.......aren't those the very things that YOU DEMS stood so proudly for??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 07:06 AM
Response to Reply #19
50. This will end up hurting already poverty stricken people. The Senate is OUT OF TOUCH ...
with the Average American ... they are almost all bloated Millionaires - clueless and driven by FOX news hit pieces. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #19
63. Thanks. Gillibrand, huh? I'm surprised and impressed. Sad not to see Feingold or Kerry, though.
Edited on Tue Sep-15-09 07:58 AM by No Elephants
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
21. "Just Running Scared"..."Don't know what to do"....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
24. What a short-sighted and stupid thing to do
Have they even evaluated the consequences of banning funds to ACORN? Are there equivalent groups in some communities to administer the funding? Aren't we talking about risking thousands of people that qualify for and need heating assistance and housing assistance now falling into a void of no identified agency to administer the funding?

If so, at the very LEAST they better put language in there to address this and keep ACORN until alternative agencies can be identified.

Hell... didn't they even do that for Blackwater? And on the scale of bad... I don't think ACORN even comes close to Blackwater.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atlgadem Donating Member (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. Oh please, you gotta be kidding me....
Acorn condoning prostitution takes the cake over Blackwater.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #27
34. So prostitution is worse than murder?
What kind of wack job are you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DatManFromNawlins Donating Member (640 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #34
40. Ain't just prostitution... CHILD prostitution
Unless, you know, bringing chinese children to the US to have them be fucktoys AND tax breaks is your sort of thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #40
42. Yep. The linked story didn't provide that little detail...
Anyone who hasn't actually watched the tapes should do so. It is absolutely revolting. I suppose one could make the case that this was just a few wackos out of many employees, but I don't know... this was so bad that it leaves the impression that the organization is almost certainly lacking in oversight and discipline.

As far as the tape being doctored... I suppose that's possible, but as far as I could tell, the video matched up with the audio quite well. This wasn't like watching a Japanese movie dubbed into English. The lips matched the words and the gestures. If the tape was doctored it would have involved a very sophisticated effort. Furthermore, it's pretty weak for ACORN to make some general statement about the tape being "doctored" and threatening to sue, without stating precisely what these women didn't say that the tape shows them saying. In a PR disaster like this, you don't wait for the court system to air such grievances. If the fate of the entire organization is on the line, you lay it out immediately.

This was a PR disaster of epic proportions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #42
93. Could these wacko employees have been plants sent in by the opposition
Edited on Tue Sep-15-09 11:40 AM by Uncle Joe
to voter registration as a means of discrediting ACORN?

I wonder if they were long time employees or did they just start?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #40
118. Fact: ACORN has never been involved with child prostitution.
Your screeching aside.

Fact: Blackwater personnel murdered 25 Iraqi civilians in one incident alone.

So, tell me which one is worse. Having a couple idiot employees, whom you fire, or ... murder.

Squwk.....squawk....squawk little fweeper!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #27
64. No, YOU have got o be kidding all of us. There is not even an allegation that ACORN
did anything at all wrong, let alone condoning child prostitution. With thousands of ACORN employees, this duo of dirty tricksters went from office to office until it found a couple of dumbasses. As for these two minimum wage (or close) employees trying to sound like they knew what they were talking about being worse than Blackwater's having murder as a corporate policy, you are simply nuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evensteven007 Donating Member (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #64
151. 5 offices of dumbasses
you might of had a point, but 5 offices all with the same result.....the corruption is deep and i for one am glad my hard earned tax money will no longer go to help these ...........dumbasses, your words not mine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
28. Geez, this is punishing a whole group based on the actions of a few
Overall, ACORN does a lot of good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #28
65. It's worse than that. It's punishing a not for profit on the basis of a bad video.
No other side of the story, no trial, no nuttin'.

America can't seem to throw enough of her ideals and principles under the bus fast enough these days. Where have all the Profiles in Courage gone, long time passing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #65
139. True, not the same kind of case as the case mentioned below
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
24601 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #28
134. You ever heard of the former accounting firm Arthur Anderson?
classic case - a few screwed up, all punished as the company had to be disbanded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #134
138. ACORN does not have to be disbanded
Repukes have done fraud on a much grander scale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prostomulgus Donating Member (188 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
31. How did Reid even let this come to a vote?
It's WAAAAAY past time to replace his ass with someone who can play hardball with the pukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #31
66. If your 60 Democratic Senators wanted a majority leader who plays hardball, they would have elected
one. I emailed my Democratic Senators and asked them to initiate action to replace Reid. I am under no delusion that they will. However, I wanted them to know that I hold them responsible for Reid being Reid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomm2thumbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
35. how many names did Blackwater go through - can we expect the same of Acorn now?

change the name
change the letterhead
change the website design
moving on to the next item for business
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #35
68. Difference being, Blackwater (and Halliburton) set out to make billions and did so via
corporate policies that were criminal. ACORN, on the other hand, is a not for profit organization whose goals are registering low income voters, benefiting the needy, underprivileged, etc. None of its official policies are criminal. However, out of maybe 15,000 employees and forty or so years of existence, it has hired a handful of losers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
38. The Democrats are yellow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TiredOldMan Donating Member (160 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
39. ACORN has nobody to blame except themselves
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 07:07 AM
Response to Reply #39
51. Bullshit! They are a large organization that was targeted. FOX drives our legislative agenda?
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #39
67. For what? Hiring people who are not rocket scientists working for minimum wage?
Tell me, if you fall for some Rethug dirty tricks and say some off the chart dumbass thing that no one in their right mind would have foreseen, should your boss go to jail or lose his business?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #67
73. I see it as a failure of management, of policy, no different than many business scandals
Edited on Tue Sep-15-09 09:11 AM by slackmaster
Anyone who works for an organization of that nature (or anywhere else) should operate under a policy that strictly prohibits supporting criminal activity.

It seems like common sense to most of us, but because ACORN is stuck with some poorly qualified people they need to make sure their policies are clear and that their people are closely monitored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #73
106. It is perfectly possible that ACORN did prohibit illegal activity very clearly
and that these particular employees did not consider giving these people the "advice" they gave them illegal, or that they didn't care. I'm leaning to the latter because it's hard to imagine that anyone thinks it's fine to lend a helping hand to a child prostitution ring, or to break any law, whether or not the employer emphasizes that you are to do only legal things. In fact, I find it hard to imagine that, should your employer stress that breaking the law is acceptable, you would not know better than to believe that.

Beyond that, though, we don't know what happened among these people that we don't see in the video.

Mind you, I am not saying ACORN was not remiss. I am not saying it was remiss, either, though. I am saying that we do not have enough information to make either of those determinations. I am also saying that you cannot impute criminal conduct to an employer in the same way that you can impute civil liability to the lawyer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #73
125. Oh, Right!
Edited on Tue Sep-15-09 07:12 PM by ProudDad
Every employee of every organization of course follows "policy" to the letter... :sarcasm:

Geez, what color's the sky in your universe?

Throw a GREAT organization like Acorn under the bus because the far-right was able to find or manufacture this tempest in a teapot?

Cowardly...and clueless...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-16-09 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #125
141. Anyone who is faced with a novel, unexpected situation at work can always defer to authority
"Let me call my manager" can get you out of a whole lot of trouble. Trying to fake your way through it is just stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TiredOldMan Donating Member (160 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #67
89. Happens every day.
Businesses are punished every day for what their employees do. I owned four companies in my younger years and I had big problems a couple of times when just ONE employee did something stupid.

This is worse because it is several employees in several different locations on different days around the country. It is unfrotunately a discernable pattern.

We have to deal with the facts. Admit it. If this was some conservative group instead of ACORN you would be livid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #89
90. Was your business forced to shut down?
Or did you try to make amends and continue operations?

Just because there was that lady who threw parties in a foreclosed mansion, does that mean Wells Fargo has to shut down?

Before a pattern can be established, we need to know how many they approached who didn't play ball. I doubt we'll ever see that statistic. Public opinion is being manipulated here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TiredOldMan Donating Member (160 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #90
110. We did lose a big contract because of what one stupid
employee did. It cost the jobs of ten other employees when we lost the work. Half our business at that time was immediately gone.

I agree with you in point. I would like to know how many offices turned them down. I would really like to know who immediately reported them to the police because they said they wanted to open a house with child prostitutes.

The problem is at least people in three or more offices were okay with all of this.

I pray they don't shut ACORN down, but quite a few people need to be fired including much of their national management since that is ultimately who is responsible. That's what being in charge means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #89
98. Yes, but not criminally. You don't put the employer in jail because his employee
Edited on Tue Sep-15-09 12:35 PM by No Elephants
commits a crime. And crimes are involved here, and in most allegations against ACORN.

The reason an employer is held civilly liable for an employee's actions is a legal technicality, not a sign of actual guilt on the part of the employer. In part, social policy is that the employer is in a better position to insure against his employee's acts than is the victim. Of course, the employee is legally liable, too, but he or she may not have the money to compensate the victim. So, the courts developed a doctrine that compensates the victim via a cost of doing business. The doctrine is a legal technicality, not an indication that the employer is morally wrong. And, as I said, it does not apply at all to crimes.

(Of course the employer is responsible for its own actions, such as putting someone in charge of kids without doing a background check, but that is a different issue.)

Sorry, but when you are going out of your way to employ the disadvantaged and two unscrupulous (IMO) people are going out of their way to get the employees in trouble, you don't have a very discernible pattern. Nor can you call four employees out of 10,000 or 15,000 a discernible pattern.

I am dealing with facts--and law. I think you are drawing incorrect conclusions about ACORN from them. I am drawing none yet. If you notice, I disagree with specific points. I never conclude that ACORN is at fault or not at fault.

As far as my being livid, what does that have to do with anything?

But, I have been plenty livid with Democrats as well as with Republicans. I might be meaner to a Republican, but I don't accuse them of crimes on something this dicey. I might favor Democrats more, but I don't let them off the hook when the evidence is there. I'd love to see you find a post of mine, past, present or future, that cuts one more factual or legal slack than the other. If you do, I will repent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rayofreason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #98
116. There is a 4th video...
...this time from California.

There is something seriously wrong in an organization where the corporate culture allows so many people to think that dispensing this kind of "advice" is OK somehow. 1 or 2, perhaps an aberration. But 4? I don't think so. How many real pimps doing real damage got the same advice?

This calls for a major investigation. How deep is the pattern of corruption? How far does it extend? There are charges that it goes to the top. Just google "former ACRON board member."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rayofreason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #98
117. Take a look at this
http://www.acorn-8.net/

ACORN needs a major housecleaning before it will be able to do what it set out to do - help low and moderate income people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #89
126. No I wouldn't!
Edited on Tue Sep-15-09 07:14 PM by ProudDad
I'm already livid that ANY "conservative" groups are allowed to persist...

And that there are enough bat-shit crazy idiots to "join" them...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
59. very sad...
I knew some ACORN higher-ups when I lived outside D.C. and they were all stand-up folks...Still, as another poster said upthread, they swallowed the bait and fell for the con and as a result have become radioactive politically...Time to rebuild...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #59
127. You mean those "stand-up" folks you knew
Edited on Tue Sep-15-09 07:15 PM by ProudDad
swallowed the bait and fell for the con...?

You seem to be painting the entire organization with the right-wing paint brush (the same one the cowardly Senate Dems used)...

Time to rebuild???

WTF???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
69. looks as if they were looking for this very opportunity
so if a few people get caught doing something wrong, the government has to defund the whole program? Seems a bit extreme to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
74. So, ACORN is funded under Bush admin, and not funded under Obama's.
Hmm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
western mass Donating Member (718 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #74
160. see, there IS a difference between Repubs and Democrats!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeycola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
76.  Senate votes to deny funds to ACORN
Source: AP

Sad to see this and Acorn has done a lot of good. Yet, I think it was necessay.


http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jxhq8CPN8LdLntDEDtE5NrEBQ2IgD9ANF3F01

Senate votes to deny funds to ACORN

By ANDREW TAYLOR (AP) – 12 hours ago

WASHINGTON — The Senate voted Monday to block the Housing and Urban Development Department from giving grants to ACORN, a community organization under fire in several voter-registration fraud cases.

The 83-7 vote would deny housing and community grant funding to ACORN, which stands for the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now.

The action came as the group is suffering from bad publicity after a duo of conservative activists posing as a prostitute and her pimp released hidden-camera videos in which ACORN employees in Baltimore gave advice on house-buying and how to account on tax forms for the woman's income. Two other videos, aired frequently on media outlets such as the Fox News Channel, depict similar situations in ACORN offices in Brooklyn and Washington, D.C.

The Senate's move would mean that ACORN would not be able to win HUD grants for programs such as counseling low-income people on how to get mortgages and for fair housing education and outreach......................

Read more: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jxhq8CPN8LdLntDEDtE5NrEBQ2IgD9ANF3F01
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #76
77. I agree - I think it was necessary also
those videos were pretty damning . . .

Sad because these incidents overshadow lots of good work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #76
78. No... it's Stupid. There Should be an Investigation First
to see how rampant this is before punishing a whole organization. To me this was an excuse to defund them, and cast more doubt on the organization as a whole by the right wing itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maglatinavi Donating Member (614 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #78
83. stupid
I agree... How do we know that those persons were not plants of the extreme right??? Too bad that the good works of Acorn are not recognized ... I am very suspicious of the logistics ...:banghead: :dilemma:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatrynXX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #78
87. it was a bit of a knee jerk reaction this time.
Although the vids don't look all that great to them. But in the end it's really in their best interest. Kinda like when there's a major recall. After a major recall, probably the safest items on the market are after a major recall because the company was caught with a dangerous product so they clean up their act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #76
79. I"m more interested in why ACORN was targeted in this entrapment
and yet republican agencies GUILTY of voter registration fraud are never discussed, by anyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #79
80. I see a Double Standard here
there should be a thorough investigation, but it looks as if the Senate doesn't feel it is necessary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #79
82. Entrapment is a legal term referring to a defense against unfair government actions
ACORN was punked, not entrapped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #82
88. well, I'm not a lawyer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #88
102. Doesn't matter. You raised valid points and we all knew what your post meant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #82
97. No. You don't lose billions of dollars when you are merely punked. And it was the employees who
were deceived, not ACORN. ACORN was the target of a very dirty trick and smear tactics--guilt by association with these few dumbass employees.

But, wording aside, Lerkfish had a valid point. Whichever verb you wish, why ACORN?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #76
81. WTF??? Really??? 83-7??? What moronic cowards we have in The Senate. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #76
84. This smells to high heaven as a repuke SETUP - pure and simple...
Edited on Tue Sep-15-09 09:46 AM by TankLV
Mark my words: It WILL come out that these were PLANTS in the organization...

So let me get this straight: Our "democrats" can't find the time or balls to CENSURE fucking wilson, but they have PLENTY of time to do this - nice...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #84
85. yet the democrats are allowing it to influence the Senate
no investigation... but man did they all jump at the opportunity to punsih the whole organization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #84
86. Senate rules do not allow for censuring a member of the other house
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #76
129. WHAT THE FUCK???
it's spelled necessary -- and it sure as FUCK wasn't!

Well you have about 53 bat-shit crazy cowardly demoncrats in the Senate so I suppose it's time to defund the freakin' democrat party, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
99. Yeah, that was a given after the tapes surfaced
It was a trap, but they did get stuck in it. It's a shame because ACORN did a lot of good. Hopefully those funds will go to another organization that also does good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
twiceshy Donating Member (259 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
103. ACORN was pwned!
Pure and simple all the protestations about illegal taping are just hogwash. ACORN dares not sue because that would open their "books" and they sure don't want that. I'm skeptic enough to think ACORN is fully capable of laundering and stealing taxpayer dollars in the Millions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #103
109. are you sure you didn't make a wrong turn on the internets?
your whole post drips of freeper flavor.
around these parts, we don't hate ACORN with the white hot anger you seem to be displaying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timo Donating Member (890 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
108. Franken vaoted against acorn?
kinda shocked by that one I thought they were really tight with one another?!?!?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
111. Politically motivated bullshit
Brought on by the liars at Fox News.

Utter bullshit and pandering to the right.

I no longer have any faith in our system if they choose to side with the right-wing fuckers over a group that truly helps a lot of people and is often the only one who does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rayofreason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #111
113. Apologist for child sexual slavery?
Or just willfully ignorant?

One video - OK, bad apples.

Two, three - There is serious problem with organizational culture that makes people at THREE ACORN office feel like it is OK to provide advice on how to operate a child sex slave operation. To close one's eyes to that unconscionable. In fact, you have to wonder if this advice had been given before, to real pimps damaging real kids.

Now there is word of a FOURTH VIDEO. This time from California. I bet that there are more. I don't care what motivated the exposers of this monstrosity. A clear pattern of really bad activity has been established. Any intellectually honest person would demand action.

Time for a RICO investigation and some long jail-time for the guilty parties.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-16-09 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #113
147. I agree. Child porn or child prostitution goes over the line
Edited on Wed Sep-16-09 06:59 PM by robcon
Arrest the SOB's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
114. Cowardly Dems Let faux-noise and repukes Roll Over Them Again
They put the wrong headline on this.

HEY DEMOCRATS!!!

Do ya' get it now?

Those fuckers will throw you under the bus just as fast as they did Van Jones, Health Care Reform, Jocelyn Elders (remember her?) and sub-prime Mortgage Holders...

But they love their fucking bankers and Wall Street... Sure is nice they're heavily regulating them now...uh, they're not? Never Mind...

Oh, yeah, and fucking Obama is still paying billions to Halliburton, Blackwater (XE) and KBR for the endless war(tm). He marched right into the arms of the military-industrial complex before the streamers for the Inauguration were cleaned up. Gates sec'y of War!!! Give me a fucking break...

Fucking XE (Blackwater)!!! How many "bad apples" have they had? So Acorn immediately fires a couple of bad apples out of their thousands of employees -- faux-noise creates a hit piece and the FUCKING DEMONCRATS CAVE!!!

GET A CLUE, GUYS!!!!

Give me a republican any day, at least they don't lie to you. They tell you they're fascist fucks -- and they act like it... They're consistent...

The fucking Dems -- they lie to your face -- "oh, we're progressive... public option - public option... end the war... give working people a fair shake... Change you can believe in..."

But where the rubber meets the road; sorry, Charlie...

We need to pander to the right-wing to get the bill passed or the pResident will look bad.

And who else ya' gonna' vote for (haw, haw, haw!)!?!?!?!?

Get a clue, folks! These assholes aren't your friends...

:puke:

PS: Here's USAmerikan "health care": http://www.gp.org/press/pr-state.php?ID=246
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
119. What will Fox whine about now? Hmm I wonder!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
humbled_opinion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
120. A few bad apples....
The work that ACORN does in communities is too important to be judged by a few bad apples. Look just because Sgt Crowley harrassed and judged Professor Gates based on his race everyone didn't jump up and down and claim that the entire MA police dept were racist... So why is the entire organization getting judged because some radical right wing lunatic org most likely funded by fox news and the neocon racists is out posing as pimps and hookers and illegally taping some bad apples giving bad advice?

Some acorn workers acted stupidly and they were delt with swiftly so lets move on.

Next thing you know the lunatics on the right will be trying to implicate Obama with ACORN.... thats how wacked and destructive they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evensteven007 Donating Member (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #120
157. wow
just wondering if the " neocon racists" include all the dems that voted to stop the funding of this wonderful, upstanding organization that doesn't have 11 pending investigations of voter fraud, allows its CEO to embezzle millions and not press charges against, and actively promote democratic candidates when it is supposed to be non partisn...........yup, those dam destructive republicans
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tailspin17 Donating Member (19 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
132. Truth of the Matter Is...
The democrats don't have to keep throwing people and organizations overboard if they would start aligning themselves with more scrupulous people and organizations (and possibly doing background checks...).

ACORN is a despicable organization, and has been, and they are simply a GOTV political organization. And everybody here knows that. They USE the poor for votes. And every sensible person here knows that. They don't help the poor. They use the poor.

And if you think condoning child prostitution is cool, then there's something wrong with you, I don't care if their hidden camera is legal or not.

And you all know if there was a hidden camera of a Blackwater representative being set up by some brave reporter, the reporter would be a hero.


AND Both parties throw people overboard, all the time. Go find me Mark Foley, Trent Lott, Alberto Gonzalez, etc...


Be sensible. Your allegiance is to your country. Not your party. And certainly not ACORN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-16-09 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #132
143. Welcome to DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-16-09 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #132
145. Enjoy your short stay...
And please step away from the idiot box blaring faux-noise into your impressionable little mind...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evensteven007 Donating Member (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #145
152. blinded by your own ideals
i bet all you watch is CNN MSNBC and read the new york times.......im an independent and unlike YOU i prefer to get the ENTIRE story so i can make an educated, informed opinion about matters that will directly affect me and my family.................also a proud dad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ehrnst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
148. Well, if we're blocking funding to groups that waste $$ then I have a few more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
153. so how will exxon, shell, etc be treated in the cocaine,sex for oil royalties scandal
that is currently breaking? Will they be barred from all federal contracts? Will We take away all those nice leases of federal land in the West forever? Wackenhut is still a federal contractor what with their nudie guards at the State Dept.

I could see slapping ACORN on the hand for this sort of stuff... but to block it from all federal contracts forever is a bit harsh.

What is the roadmap for ACORN to be rehabilitated?

More important what will the effect of this be on a very effective vote registration machine that gets voters who usually vote Democratic?

Who can pick up the slack in their absence?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuaneBidoux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
154. I may be flamed. I am very sad by they did it to themselves.
I am not sure what the ultimately means for Acorn but when someone wants to catch you as much as Republicans have wanted to you take a lot more care.

They didn't and they have paid (we all have).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evensteven007 Donating Member (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #154
156. witch hunt, smear tactic, catch, how about stupid
this is not about the republicans, it is about the morality of government subsidized entity that runs on OUR tax money. If there was only one or two cases....maybe bad apples, but 5, no way. systemic issue with the organization, books need to be examined and ALL the fraud needs to be exposed.....i would rather my hard earned money help legitimate organizations and individuals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dr_aswan Donating Member (34 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
158. all those that praised ACORN'S efforts are now ..,,ACORN who? kinda of sad...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC