Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Baucus Bill Passes CBO Test

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-16-09 05:51 PM
Original message
Baucus Bill Passes CBO Test
Source: Political Wire

Despite intense criticisms from both Republicans and Democrats, the Congressional Budget Office has released its preliminary score of the health care bill introduced today by Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-MT) and finds it covers 94% of legal residents and reduces the deficit.

Importantly, the bill also reduces the budget deficit in future years.

Ezra Klein: "This good score is the product of the Finance Committee's sources of funding, not the relative stinginess of its subsidies. The Finance Committee could make the bill more generous, raise a bit more in revenues and still keep it deficit-improving over the next two decades. And it should."

Read more: http://politicalwire.com/archives/2009/09/16/baucus_bill_passes_cbo_test.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-16-09 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, I suppose a huge tax increase on the middle
class would do that.

You can forget being a contractor or employee of a small company making $75K a year with this plan, it will crush you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-16-09 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. I wrote him this morning.
My job is pretty much toast if his 'tax the shit out of the middle class and American companies that are keeping some of us employed' bill passes. Fuck Baucus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-16-09 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. 94%? That's ludicrously high. k&u n/t
:rofl:

:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Delphinus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. Doesn't pass the "smell" test.
To me, anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtbymark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-16-09 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. but it still screws us
where's the CBO's numbers on the effects it will have on the wallet of the consumer. Does it cap premiums?co-pays?caps?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-16-09 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. +1 They're only concerned about the cost on the government end.
This bill would be a financial disaster for a majority of the peoples.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-16-09 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. Unfortunately it won't pass the consumer affordability test. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomm2thumbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-16-09 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. they forgot to say 'it makes the Insurance Industry wealthy beyond measure and political teflon'

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr. Sparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-16-09 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. It also passed the Healthcare Insurance industry test.
but it failed to pass the peoples test. So its a no go!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
22. Congress has demonstrated time and again they do not care what the People think and that they no
Edited on Thu Sep-17-09 08:21 PM by TheWatcher
longer represent The People or our interests, or the Constitution, etc.

When this Shit Sandwich becomes law, I hope We The People will finally understand what we are dealing with, and Throw Them ALL Out if need be.

This Government needs an Enema.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-16-09 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
9. I wonder if there is a site dedicated to people who claim to be blue dogs
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-18-09 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #9
26. Yes:
www.democraticunderground.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-18-09 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. No wait--I left out a phrase
But are actually republicans and or neocons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-18-09 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. If you wish to go to such a website, perhaps DU is not the right place for you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-18-09 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. No, I like it here and actually contribute dollars for the privilege
of posting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-18-09 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. And yet you are always compalining
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-18-09 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Total bs as usual, I never complain about DU
I do complain about neocons who come here tho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-18-09 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. If you know of any conservative disruptors, I suggest you alert the moderators
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-16-09 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
10. Too bad it fails the POS test.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-16-09 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
11. Unfortunately, it fails the smell test.
So...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bkkyosemite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-16-09 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
12. We will be taxed before we even pay for a premium. It will cost a whole lot ...of course that was
not what they were looking at.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-16-09 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
13. It covers 94% of legal residents and reduces the deficit.
Edited on Wed Sep-16-09 08:12 PM by JDPriestly
That means that it will impoverish American families but not the government. That's not a solution. That's just complicating the problem. Baucus is an insurance company tool. I will be opposing Baucus' bill if it allows insurance companies to charge what they want and requires people to pay the bill. No. This bill will be hated by the American people. The CBO will be the only entity in America that likes it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
humbled_opinion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-16-09 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
14. Obama would never sign it.
Anything that raises taxes on those of us that don't make tons of money is his number 1 line in the sand.... Try again Baucus >O< .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. He did sign a tax increase on cigarettes, which hits the poor the hardest
Edited on Thu Sep-17-09 07:55 AM by Freddie Stubbs
But I suppose that is a good thing, since poor people aren't smart enough to make the right choices regarding cigarettes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
humbled_opinion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. ?
I think they are smart enough they are just sucked into the nicotine addicition for various reasons... I really don't understand your remark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. I'm not sure I'd agree with you on that. good buddy. Increase in gasoline tax hurting poor most?
Yes, and in crease in gasoline taxes would hurt the poor the most.

But an increase in ciggie taxes? I'm not sure about that. If someone is addicted to ciggies (I used to be, so I know how that is...at one point, I would've cont'd to smoke even if I'd gotten lung cancer. But I digress.) If someone is addicted to ciggies, and the cigs get too costly, there ARE other avenues of getting nicotine. There's chewing tobacco (don't laugh....my grandma switched from cigs to chewing tobacco, and she stayed on that until she died at the ripe age of 88), and there's Nicorette (you can buy generic in that).

There are also generic cigs, now, too.

So....it's not the same thing as a gasoline tax or something that's absolutely necessary for millions of people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. When he does, and gives a pretty speech justifying it, will you still cheerlead and say it's good?
Edited on Thu Sep-17-09 08:25 PM by TheWatcher
Or will we finally have the moment of clarity we so desperately need right now that NEITHER Side is on OUR Side.

I dearly hope I am wrong about this, but I have a very dark feeling that a rude awakening is upon us.

The Bill Of Goods we were Sold is about to show it's Cost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telalim Donating Member (28 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
19. Passes test because WE pay for it
Of course it passes a test because he's making us pay for insurance from insurance companies that care only about profit. I can't believe all this hard work to have a bill written by the insurance industry become the focus of so much attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
20. Well, of COURSE it won't cost cost the government more
The bill is too busy costing the TAXPAYERS more!

:headbang:
rocktivity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIdaho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
21. A bill that solves no problems but doesn't raise taxes - hardly a ringing endorsement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
24. There's one big fat thing about the Baucus bill that doesn't make economic sense
He expects to get $500 billion from Medicare. Now, how does he expect that to happen?

The only way I can see is to pay doctors and hospitals less for Medicare patients, which means they raise the prices on those of us who are not on Medicare. Or, they go out of business.

Maybe I'm missing something that someone can enlighten me on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rayofreason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
25. Harry Reid is against it...
...as you can see from this statement to his hometown newspaper

http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2009/sep/16/harry-reid-health-care-bill-wont-work-nevada/

But wait - He is really for it!

http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/09/reid_thanks_baucus_recognizes_bill_will_change.php

So which is it?

Remember what Bismark said about politics and sausage...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-18-09 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. It will probably depend on what the bill looks after Senators have a chance to offer amendments
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-18-09 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
30. Yes, it covers people, but it makes them pay much more than the
other plans out there...in the long term with people having to pay too much for their own insurance, will it really cover them if opting out is cheaper?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 02:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC