Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama EPA releases Bush-era global warming finding

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 09:10 PM
Original message
Obama EPA releases Bush-era global warming finding
Source: Associated Press

A controversial e-mail message buried by the Bush administration because of its conclusions on global warming surfaced Tuesday, nearly two years after it was first sent to the White House and never opened.

The e-mail and the 28-page document attached to it, released Tuesday by the Environmental Protection Agency, show that back in December of 2007 the agency concluded that six gases linked to global warming pose dangers to public welfare, and wanted to take steps to regulate their release from automobiles and the burning of gasoline.

The document specifically cites global warming's effects on air quality, agriculture, forestry, water resources and coastal areas as endangering public welfare.

That finding was rejected by the Bush White House, which strongly opposed using the Clean Air Act to address climate change and stalled on producing a so-called "endangerment finding" that had been ordered by the Supreme Court in 2007.

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091014/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/us_bush_global_warming_3



Bush-era EPA document on climate change released
The 2007 draft suppressed until now calls for regulation of greenhouse gases, citing global warming as a serious risk to the U.S. A finding by the Obama administration is nearly identical
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-epa-climate14-2009oct14,0,4010488.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. No surprises here. The big question is will our President continue looking for bi-partisan
support for Climate Change Legislation?

The clock is ticking.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ineeda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 05:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
19. Agree, no surprise.
But the URGENT pile keeps growing in our President's IN box.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
30. If Republicans weren't even willing to open the e-mail...
...I see no point in seeking their votes.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
55. The real news here is that this White House recognizes
Global Climate Change and will do something about it..your snark post aside.


http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/Streaming-Now-Climate-Change-Impacts-Across-America-Renewed-Focus-for-Decisions/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grassy Knoll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Please, somebody tell me why saving our world from pollution is to be hidden?
Do they hate Gore , or what ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. No, well probably, but it's not the reason.
The reason is that they're in it for themselves. Screw everyone else, so long as "I" am rich and powerful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grassy Knoll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. So Im guessing they will die with their riches.......
before everybody else is left with a non breathable world, WOW, just WOW .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Hey I don't justify their actions... just name them...
They don't give a shit about us. They don't care about anything but padding their bottom line. So long as they're doing fine, they couldn't care if we exist or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grassy Knoll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Thanks, Fearless, I guess I don't dig that deep, or didn't want to believe . n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tclambert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 06:04 AM
Response to Reply #9
21. Here's my attempt at 'splanation, Grassy Knoll:
Basic principles of Bush Republicans:

1) Greed is good. The profit motive always leads to what is best.
2) Selfishness is good. Ayn Rand said so.
3) Government can't do anything right. (At least, not if a Republican is President.)

The conclusion they reach from these principles is that government should never interfere with business. Government can co-operate with business, like, say, when business wants to raid the Treasury. Government shouldn't "burden" businesses with regulations, though, such as "Don't poison the air we all breathe."

So, if they admit greenhouse gases released by people could have (are having) a detrimental effect on the whole wide world, they would have to admit that business activities do pollute the air, and that the government ought to do something about it. Since such admissions would violate some of their core beliefs, they choose to ignore the facts and deny reality. Then they call this "standing up for their principles."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #21
29. also, the average super-suburban RW family living in a McMansion
with an SUV an a big-assed AMG Mercedes dropping off kids at school ten miles away and commuting to work 35 miles one-way still wants to hear NOTHING about potential lifestyle changes...this mindset of course makes up the bulk of Bush's base...I used to post on a lot of car boards, and you should have seen how widespread the "Gore/Kerrey is gonna take your SUV or musclecar and make everyone ride a Segway!" -mindset was...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #4
49. Nothing new here. RWers have been this greedy and self-centered
at least since Saint Ronnie was in office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blackbart99 Donating Member (421 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
56. Fearless is DEAD ON!!!!!
"The I got mine and I'll keep it if I have to kill the rest of you" is the core philosophy of these
domestic terrorist. Even if the Dem's aren't all we hoped, they are still a better alternative to
these guys(REPUGS). We have to keep them out of office at all costs. We are in it for the PLANET
and SPECIES people....do not forget!!!!!!!:hippie: :dem: :patriot: :bluebox:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bjobotts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. Somebody tell me why we are even listening to the same repubs who would destroy the US by their gree
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathappened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
26. gore is made to look like a joke
i belong to a couple of cycle boards , and there are always cracks being made agaist gore and gobal warming , i think they just watch to much fox news , and don't even have a brain of there own anymore ,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #26
46. It is a classic logical fallacy
The fallacy of Ad Hominem:

Person A makes claim X
Person B attacks person A
Therefore X is false

It is an argument that links the validity of a premise to a characteristic or belief of a person advocating the premise.

The GOP uses it heavily
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
33. It's all about them and their profits. It would cost them oil revenue to institute change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
40. there's not as much money in it for them as there is in an oily economy.
and by the time the shit hits the fan, environmentally speaking- they'll be dead and gone anyway- so why should they worry about it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
53. because too many threw in with the big polluters
and because of that, these greedy bastards would rather maintain their gloutony rather than give a damn about the very planet they live on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Golden Raisin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
57. Good ol' boy buddies
in the Oil/Gas businesses, etc. Saving our world from pollution cuts into their profits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grassy Knoll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #57
66. Wow, I would like to thank All at DU for your responses,
I Know where to go for an answer in the future, Thanks again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
era veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
61. Pollution
There is no pollution in Boca Raton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. How many know that the maps of "growing zones" have had to be changed??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Altoid_Cyclist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 06:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
24. There is a positive side to climate change.
Edited on Wed Oct-14-09 07:30 AM by Altoid_Cyclist
:sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm:

The way that things are going, it won't be too many more years before we can grow palm trees here in central PA. Of course most of the native species of plants and the animals that depend on them will have died off.

We better just hope that somebody knows where they keep the spare Earth just in case we kill this one.

This reminds me of the song: Into the Void by Black Sabbath


This will blow out the morning cobwebs if you don't drink coffee!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WFOcsPNQBdw

Rocket engines burning fuel so fast
Up into the night sky they blast
Through the universe the engines whine
Could it be the end of man and time
Back on earth the flame of life burns low
Everywhere is misery and woe
Pollution kills the air, the land and sea
Man prepares to meet his destiny
Rocket engines burning fuel so fast
Up into the night sky so vast
Burning metal through the atmosphere
Earth remains in worry, hate and fear
With the hateful battles raging on
Rockets flying to the glowing sun
Through the empires of eternal void
Freedom from the final suicide

Freedom fighters sent out to the sun
Escape from brainwashed minds and pollution.
Leave the earth to all its sin and hate
Find another world where freedom waits.
Past the stars in fields of ancient void
Through the shields of darkness where they find
Love upon a land a world unknown
Where the sons of freedom make their home

Leave the earth to satan and his slaves
Leave them to their future in the grave
Make a home where love is there to stay



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #24
42. Flashback!!!
Yeah, great song and right on point!

:donut:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Altoid_Cyclist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #42
50. I'm showing my age, but I actually still have the album (vinyl).
I always said that they were 20 or 30 years ahead of their time.
Mankind is showing just how prescient they were.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soylent Brice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 07:35 AM
Response to Reply #5
27. that was cool. thanks for posting the link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northernlights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #5
31. yup. farmers, gardeners and aggie types have seen the effects for some time
growing zones were changed commercially (on seed packets) more than a decade ago. The USDA was slow to catch up, but finally did, using a change in its website systems as cover for the underlying change to the zones.

It also affects the bugs we deal with, and their timing. Here where I live in Maine, it seems as though the dreaded May flies are on the decline. But in July, we had an influx of midges/noseeums. I've only lived up here 6 years, but I hadn't seen (really, felt) them since I moved here. My horse is allergic -- for 6 years he had peace and then this summer was the worst problems he'd ever had.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmike27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
45. Being on the cusp of a zone
I've noticed this phenominon in the weather, which is directly related.

Most weather prediction modelers are based on where the front is, how fast it is moving, then it is compared to similar fronts in the past. What I've noticed is, going into Winter, they predict lower temperatures. Then, invariably they adjust them, upward, never down. What this shows is that in most modeling, they've not taken into account the changes of recent years.

I like the cold weather, and here in Mobile Alabma, it's hot like six-seven months of the year. So I see the prediction, it's going into the fifties, say "Yea, ahhhhhh," then the next day I look, and it's disappeared. "Damn" I say, then I wait for the next one. It's as if they are taunting us. I think this one is going to make it, though I've not checked today, usually if it cools us down for several days, then it's a serious arctic clipper.

I just wonder when the programmers of these weather predictive modeling programs are going to more heavily weight the information of recent years, to correct out this predictive problem. Seriously, the low was 77 a few nights ago, and it's fucking October!! I should move, as I'm miserable for most of the year anyway.(and it sucks to be in a state that is one of the poorest states, but votes for Bush to the tune of 65 percent) I always correlate that with the fact that we're near the bottom in education!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
60. Indeed. I'm growing a peach tree in Minnesota right now
And I only decided to plant one after I found out a neighbor had a 5-yr old peach tree loaded with peaches in 2007! Before that I would have laughed if someone would have told me it was possible.

You still have to choose the most cold-hardy variety (I'm growing Reliance, though I've heard Contender is also good down to -25F), but it is still amazing to think about. We've gone from a borderline zone 3/zone 4 to a borderline zone 4/zone 5 in less than 20 years.

Next spring, I'll be adding pears, northern kiwi vines, and apricots to the orchard in the backyard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. GOP M.O. - Deny, Cover up, Spin lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zambero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
58. The GOP needs a new mascot
Republicans give elephants a bad name. Given their propensity to bury their heads in the sand and ignore reality, the ostrich would be a much better choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Altoid_Cyclist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #58
62. A dung beetle seems like a good fit.
The GOP loves to push mounds of &%#@ around. If this doesn't look like a repuke, then nothing does.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dung_beetle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #62
63. At least a dung beetle serves a purpose, though. Need something extinct...Dodo Bird?
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Altoid_Cyclist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #63
64. Thank you for the addendum. I'm glad that you caught that.
I thought about saying that at least they serve a purpose but as soon as I heard my wife say that supper was ready my mind went blank.

I apologize to all of the hard working dung beetles out there doing their jobs.

I loved the part in the link about them having a shovel like head!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. Another item to add to Bush's legacy.
He was the perfect tool of the mega rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
10. Sounds a bit dictatorial, in snubbing the Supreme Court order
    That finding was rejected by the Bush White House, which strongly opposed using the Clean Air Act to address climate change and stalled on producing a so-called "endangerment finding" that had been ordered by the Supreme Court in 2007.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bjobotts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. They laughed all the way to the bank. These are not sane people
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 05:19 AM
Response to Reply #10
20. I'm sure somebody wrote a strongly worded letter to them about it, too
and said that if they didn't comply with the SCotUS, they would stamp their feet and have a temper tantrum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #20
52. Praise the Lord, for Accountability! n/t
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
13. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
14. I think it's these two
These two pdf's are on the EPA Frequently-Requested Records page:

# Endangerment Comments
(Comments on Draft Technical Support Document for Endangerment Analysis for Greenhouse Gas Emissions
under the Clean Air Acts)

# 2007 Draft Proposed Endangerment Finding

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 04:02 AM
Response to Original message
15. Somehow this is Al Gore's fault nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 05:08 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. ZYCLON-B(ush)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NecklyTyler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 04:19 AM
Response to Original message
16. Just more evidence that the Bush Administration was a tool for big business
Bush and Cheney worked to advance the interests of big oil, defense contractors, and Wall Street financiers. If Eric Holder would would take a little initiative, the whole Bush crew would be behind bars
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NecklyTyler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 04:19 AM
Response to Original message
17. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 06:32 AM
Response to Original message
22. Never opened? That's typical. Not unlike the warning about bin Laden.
Mad Eye Moody would be disappointed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenfrequed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #22
35. Well...
If you don't open it you can pretend that you were uninformed and might not be required to take action. It's a facile rationalization, but there you have it. Doesn't anyone wonder why the report wasn't committed to something paper?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #35
37. It doesn't have to be on paper to exist.
The unopened file is good enough.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenfrequed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #37
44. I am thinking in terms of legality
An unopened file can be argued to have been lost. In fact having it sent as a file and leaving it unopened could be a way that it could be argued that they never read the material or believe they never saw the document.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
la_chupa Donating Member (357 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
23. we may never know what all they were up to
scary thought really
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
25. Endangering the Public's General Welfare
Edited on Wed Oct-14-09 07:12 AM by fasttense
The bushes and Cheney deliberately endangered the Public's General Welfare. A direct violation of the US Constitution and the oath they took to uphold the document. They are traitors. They are worse than traitors. They couldn't even get through the fist paragraph (the Preamble) of the US Constitution without violating it.

"We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soylent Brice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
28. a thought:
this is just one of many things to be discovered or revealed that was previously hidden by jr's admin.

we're only 9 months into another presidency.

9 months.

i mean, wow. how much more shit like this are we going to find, in just the next year or two, even? this shit is unreal. not that i'm surprised, but just wow.

K&R

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
32. Shouldn't their inaction be seen as criminal? Harmful to mankind?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #32
34. But you see, it doesn't matter!
This is America, and if you can accumulate enough money, you'll never die!!!!!

The problem is, though, that people keep dying, but for a very simple reason - no single individual has yet accumulated enough - and that's why we have to keep trying to make that possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Torn_Scorned_Ignored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
36. What 's This?!
I thought Obama was only looking forward..

When are these Fuc_s going to Prison?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr. Sparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
38. Pardon my French, but the fuckers should be jailed for derelict of duty. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #38
48. Yep, them and every goatfucker that facilitated their coup. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BREMPRO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
39. An Inconvenient Truth. bury it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
41. kick
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThisThreadIsSatire Donating Member (697 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
43. Dick Cheney is a perfect example of
.. of what can happen to humans too, if they breathe too much of that shit...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
47. How could the document's "finding be rejected" if the document was "never opened"? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #47
65. Rejected=Flat Earth Administration. Never Opened=Head in the Sand Administration.
Both? Head in the Flat Earth Administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
51. And this shows where the biggest problem is -
all the apologists who say "there is no evidence" are relying on people HIDING the evidence.

This is NOT an isolated incident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
54. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
59. Kicked and recommended for the truth coming out.
Thanks for the thread, cal04.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 05:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC