Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pakistan army begins ground assault on Taliban in South Waziristan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 02:29 AM
Original message
Pakistan army begins ground assault on Taliban in South Waziristan
Source: Telegraph & BBC

Pakistan's army has begun a ground operation against Taliban militants in the South Waziristan region on the Afghan border after weeks of air and artillery strikes.

Published: 7:59AM BST 17 Oct 2009

A senior government official said that the government and party leaders gave the military full backing on Friday, vowing to weed out militants and restore the writ of the state.

"The ground operation has begun," said Tariq Hayat Khan, the secretary of Pakistan's ethnic Pashtun tribal regions.

The army has said about 28,000 soldiers are in place to take on an estimated 10,000 hard-core Taliban. About 500 commandos arrived in the region on Friday, security officials said.

The army has stepped up its air and artillery attacks in recent days to soften up the militants' defences while civilians have been fleeing.

The militants have launched a series of brazen attacks in the past 12 days, striking at the United Nations, the army headquarters, police and the general public, killing more than 150 people and apparently trying to stave off the army assault.

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2009/10/17/world/international-uk-pakistan-violence-operation.html?_r=1



Pakistan forces move on Taliban

Source: BBC

The Pakistan army has started moving troops and artillery towards the Taliban militants' stronghold in South Waziristan, local officials say.

They told the BBC that 30,000 troops backed by tanks were moving in on the stronghold of Hakimullah Mehsud, the new head of the Pakistan Taliban.

They are moving from the north, the east, and the west.

A curfew was imposed in the region before the offensive began, after several Taliban attacks in recent days.

A lot more details here: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/8311927.stm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
proteus_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 02:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good!
I wish them success.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 02:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
proteus_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 03:50 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Have I offended your delicate sensibilities in some way?
Yeah, I'm happy that Pakistan is starting to get up off its ass and doing something about the Taliban.

When did I say anything about a bloodbath? I'd be happy if the Taliban forces surrendered without a shot being fired.

Are you still offended? Would you like to retire to the fainting couch in the parlor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bigmack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 02:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'm not an expert, but it seems to me...
that 3-to-1 odds in favor of the Pakistanis isn't enough in country owned by the Taliban. Especially if the Pakistani troops are "backed by tanks".

If I recall correctly, modern armies have a real problem in that area.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-18-09 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. 3:1 was the "rule of thumb" for attacking prepared positions through most of modern history
The terrain's to the defenders' advantage there, but on the other hand the Pakistanis would have vastly more experience with that neck of the woods than the coalition forces in Afghanistan. (Also, infantry backed by tanks would be a much different thing than tanks backed by infantry - the latter would definitely be madness in that terrain.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YouTakeTheSkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-18-09 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. True, but
with the United States providing the air support, they stand a much better chance of winning this thing than they ever did before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
era veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 03:38 AM
Response to Original message
4. Our ally is only 8 years late
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rapier09 Donating Member (209 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 03:58 AM
Response to Original message
6. Allah help them
Because this is going to be a either over shortly or it is going to be take them a long long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. They're saying 6 to 8 weeks
ISLAMABAD: Director General (DG) Inter Services Public Relations (ISPR), Maj Gen Athar Abbas has said security forces have launched operation "Rah-e-Nijat" against the militants in South Waziristan adding this operation can take 6 to 8 weeks towards its completion.

DG ISPR said this during his press briefing here Saturday in connection with operation in South Waziristan.

More: http://www.onlinenews.com.pk/details.php?id=153855

I heard a reporter saying on Al jazeera English earlier that they only have a window of a couple of months before the harsh winter that area experiences sets in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YouTakeTheSkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-18-09 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. It's Really Doesn't Seem Like Much Time
but I guess we'll have to wait and see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 04:36 AM
Response to Original message
7. Glad I live in Whogivesashitistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
8. "South Waziristan is a major worry for the U.S."
South Waziristan is a major worry for the U.S. not only because of concerns for the faltering American war effort in Afghanistan but also because it is considered a base from which to launch attacks across the world.

"This region is at the heart of the struggle against al-Qaida, the Taliban, and other global jihadi movements. It is a lawless sanctuary for extremists and would-be militants of every shape, size, and color," said Evan Kohlmann, whose U.S.-based NEFA Foundation follows terrorist groups.

=snip=

The plan is to capture and hold the area where Abbas estimates 10,000 insurgents are headquartered and reinforced with about 1,500 foreign fighters, most of them of Central Asian origin. "There are Arabs, but the Arabs are basically in the leadership, providing resources and expertise and in the role of trainers," he said.

=snip=

Despite sometimes rocky relations with the Pakistani military, the U.S. is trying to rush in equipment that would help with mobility, night fighting and precision bombing, a U.S. Embassy official told The Associated Press in a recent interview. "If we could deliver things tomorrow, it would be here," said the official, speaking on condition of anonymity because the issue is politically sensitive. In addition to night vision devices, the Pakistan military has said it is seeking additional Cobra helicopter gunships, heliborne lift capability, laser-guided munitions and intelligence equipment to monitor cell and satellite telephones.

Full article: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hkiMxbHNH0BqgpWA2ZG6VD6wVTmAD9BCMKK81

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
10. Better late than never
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnfranklin Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. agreed, but what are the costs?
it looks like this offensive in pakistan doesn't necessarily help the U.S. troops in the area (as mentioned in this video: http://bit.ly/2uCWDj) i think taliban fighters will simply cross the border and make trouble in afghanistan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YouTakeTheSkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I find it unlikely that we'll pass up the opportunity to hit them from both sides
Even simply forcing the Taliban and al-Qaeda to move opens them up to attack from special forces and drones, so even assuming the worst (that we don't hit them from both sides with large numbers of ground forces) this is still a positive development.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC