Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jindal, Mary Landrieu want official who wouldn't marry interracial couple ousted

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
funkybutt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 12:42 PM
Original message
Jindal, Mary Landrieu want official who wouldn't marry interracial couple ousted
Source: Times Picayune, New Orleans

Louisiana's governor and a U.S. senator joined Friday in calling for the ouster of a local official who refused to marry an interracial couple, saying his actions clearly broke the law.

Keith Bardwell, a white justice of the peace in Tangipahoa Parish in the southeastern part of the state, refused to issue a marriage license earlier this month to Beth Humphrey, who is white, and Terence McKay, who is black. His refusal has prompted calls for an investigation or resignation from civil and constitutional rights groups and the state's Legislative Black Caucus.

-snip-

"Disciplinary action should be taken immediately -- including the revoking of his license," Jindal said.

Read more: http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2009/10/jindal_mary_landrieu_want_offi.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Did anyone in a position of authority know this guy was doing this crap?
This wasn't the first time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Seems like everything has been handled appropriately
excepting of course the initial crime obviously.

No complaints here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mackerel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. The argument was that he referred them to other JOP's
so the couples were at least able to marry if they wanted to but let's face it the JOP was specifically talking about blacks marrying other races. The JOP would have been o.k. with say Vietnamese and whites or Pakistani and whites.

Good to see Jindal take a decent stand on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dballance Donating Member (460 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. NO Credit for Jindal or Landrieu
Don't even take a minute to credit Jindal or Landrieu. They are not providing leadership on this issue. They're trying to make some political capital on it. That's all. It's easy to find out the masses are outraged at the actions of a single idiot and then pile on by making "me too" remarks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. They did the right thing in this case
no complaints from me.

I mean if you're going to start complaining about politicians acting well politically then you won't have much free time to do anything (like sleep, eat or breathe).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. Good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. Landrieu's actually on the right side of an issue?
Will miracles never cease?

(And Jindal too, for that matter.... )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-18-09 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #5
25. I guess there is no corporate funding involved in this issue. //nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. Sooooooooo.....WTF..... did it take so long to get this asshole's number?
This cannot have been the first time he did this kind of bullshit, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
groundloop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Maybe the first time since electing a President
who is of mixed race decent, and bigots are beginning to stand out like a sore thumb.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Good point! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. I read a quote where he said he's done it before

He's been flying under the radar for some time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dballance Donating Member (460 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. Opportunistic Assholes Both of Them
Don't even take a minute to credit Jindal or Landrieu. They are not providing leadership on this issue. They're trying to make some political capital on it. That's all. It's easy to find out the masses are outraged at the actions of a single idiot and then pile on by making "me too" remarks.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. What would you consider "leadership on this issue"?

They don't have the power to remove a judge.

All they can do is speak out against the judge (although Jindal took his sweet time about it). Landrieu showed leadership by speaking out almost immediately when it was made public.

Judiciary Commission
On recommendation of the judiciary commission, the Supreme Court may discipline or remove judges from office.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-18-09 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #14
23. Do I hear a squeaky voice from the vicinity of dballance, murmuring "Pass"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-18-09 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. I get the feeling

That dballance thought one of them could wave a magic wand and the judge would be removed from office.


The first thing I did, which should have been the first thing dballance did, was to check Louisiana laws on removing judges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-19-09 01:36 AM
Response to Reply #24
27. Please see Reply #26.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-19-09 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #14
26. He is not a judge. He is a Justice of the Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
10. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
winyanstaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
12. Dang right he should be out of office...and never allowed in public office again.
Edited on Sat Oct-17-09 02:57 PM by winyanstaz
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
13. Kicked and recommended.
Thanks for the thread, funkybutt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
16. Good,
bipartisan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
17. Here's your chance to show you're down with the bruthas, Jindy!

rocktivity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radhika Donating Member (563 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
18. Would Jindal count as white?
Just wondering....I am under the impression some state's anti-miscegenation laws could have prohibited Asians marrying whites. Technically all such laws have been illegal since 1968, but obviously this JoP lives in another era.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azureblue Donating Member (412 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Just as I thought
Just like people categorize Obama as black, even though he is half white, the groom is not pure "black" and is more Creole, than anything else. I finally got to see a pic of Mr. McKay, and he looks like the average Louisiana creole (a once highly respected group in La., before the feds dropped in, and decided to call them "black").

So what does this have to do with the price of tomatoes? This: America STILL categorizes a person as black, if they have any Negro blood in them. Now why is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocowriter Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-19-09 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #19
32. Reply to Just as I Thought/azureblue
Yes, what is your point. Where are you going with this. You are going off on a whole other topic that is not the issue here. The bottom line McKay must have identified (and the key word is identify), and there fore that idiot jop based his judgment. And Creoles are still Creole and identify as such but some Creoles identify as black also. People can idenitfy as they want.

Anyhoo, all this hoopla about this racist only confirms what I have been saying about the South, no matter how progressive the South is, it is still the South with all their racists and KKK hiding behind sheets and JD degrees. Do not think for one minute, this was the first time this man pulled this stunt; it is only now that someone stepped up and and went to the media about it. Good for them. The Southern way for both black and whites and other is to not rock the boat and in doing so, they are all complicit in perpetrating 50s and 60s mentality on racial issues. I was in the South this summer. I called my family out who live in rural areas like this place in Louisiana on letting racist incidents go on, letting racists say and do anything with impunity. All I hear is "You don't live here"; "That's the way it is", We have to live here." BS. And then they complain among themselves. The biggest mistake is to keep doing the same thing and expecting a different result. Call out the racist behavior that has been allowed. It's almost 2010 people!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-19-09 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #18
28. Laws restricting marriage on the basis of race were always "illegal." The SCOTUS
Edited on Mon Oct-19-09 01:59 AM by No Elephants
just did not get an opportunity to rule on mixed marriages, one way or another, until 1967 (not 1968). That does not mean, though, that the laws were constitutional before that. The Fourteenth Amendment was always the same. The laws always violated it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
21. What I wonder is whether a judge can even get away with
breaking the law.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-19-09 01:39 AM
Response to Reply #21
29. Please see Reply # 26.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-18-09 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
22. Why is it not a routine response? Should it really need high-ranking politicians
to urge it - as if the decision to oust dismiss the individual from his post in some way be problematic? He, above all kites and crows, would understand that somethings are not negotiable. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-19-09 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
30. Ran for 30 years unopposed. As a Republican. Thought so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-19-09 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. You haven't researched this one very thoroughly or read carefully
Edited on Mon Oct-19-09 10:37 AM by slackmaster
The article cited in the OP does not say that he ran as a Republican for 30 years, only that he is a Republican now, which is true.

Here is evidence that he did not always run as a Republican, courtesy of the Louisiana Secretary of State:

http://www400.sos.louisiana.gov/cgibin?rqstyp=comh1&rqsdta=26510100

It looks like our party nominating a mixed-race candidate for President pushed him over the edge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brendan120678 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-19-09 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. He was probably a holdover from the Dixiecrat era who...
never got around to changing his affiliation to Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-19-09 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. That makes sense. I remember the Dixiecrats during the 1968 Presidential election.
I lived in Alamogordo, NM at the time. There were Wallace bumper stickers EVERYWHERE.

Things are different in the Deep South. I don't pretend to understand the politics there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DatManFromNawlins Donating Member (640 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-19-09 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. Obama had nothing to do with it
That guy has always referred mixed-race couples to another Justice of the Peace to get married.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC