Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Vetoes First Piece of Legislation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 12:28 AM
Original message
Obama Vetoes First Piece of Legislation
Source: Associated Press

President Barack Obama has rejected his first piece of legislation from Congress, a stopgap spending bill that never had to take effect.

The White House on Wednesday said Obama exercised his right to send back to the Capitol a temporary appropriations bill that lawmakers passed in case a winter storm about two weeks ago would have prevented them from approving a final measure to fund the Pentagon next year. The Dec. 19 blizzard didn't keep them away from the Capitol and they approved the $626 billion defense spending bill before the previous budget expired.

The White House described the move as a technicality that the president took out of an abundance of caution, and that it was his first veto.

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2009/12/31/us/AP-US-Obama-Veto.html?adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1262236860-vvvmeQ+Qos7tds5+GlOi0Q
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. Disgusting. That's not the hope and change I voted for.
Waaaaaaaaaaahhhh!!!!

Kucinich or Dean in '12!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thanks for the smile
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 03:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Kvelling over a technicality that probably was not necessary as "change?" LOL
Edited on Thu Dec-31-09 03:26 AM by No Elephants
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grytpype Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. +100000
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwheeler31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. Good that bill was so loaded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoeyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 02:13 AM
Response to Original message
4. It's almost sad.
They (Congress) can put forward a spending bill that'll take over in case they can't get there to vote for the real budget for the Pentagon, but every single social program has to fight tooth and nail for every penny.
Would this have even done anything since they passed the real budget?
Good on him for vetoing it anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
impik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 02:30 AM
Response to Original message
5. These people have no shame. Unbelievable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 03:30 AM
Response to Original message
7.  An unnecessary veto. Wow.
Everyone made a big deal over Bush's never having vetoed anything from 2000 to 2006. So, now we have a meaningless veto. And some are impressed. Good grief.

And we're supposed to be the smarter Party.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Sadly, We Are
W would have signed it anyway, and then where would we be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. With the other party becoming unbearable, it is sending some
of their rif-raf our way. Hopefully hanging out on DU long enough will smarten em up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
9. That's $2000 a head
What kind of protection racket is the Pentagon running, that it costs $2000 per person?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-01-10 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
12. Mr. President, out of an abundance of caution, please bail main street out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC