Extremist Islamic group defends UK parade

Source: BBC

The leader of an Islamic group, said to have extremist links, has written to families of fallen soldiers about its plans to march through Wootton Bassett.

Islam4UK wants to walk through the Wiltshire town, which has become famous for paying tribute to soldiers killed in Afghanistan, carrying empty coffins.

Anjem Choudary, of Islam4UK, admitted the town had been chosen because it would attract the most media attention. But former mayor Chris Wannell asked the group to reconsider its choice.

Islam4UK is said to call itself a "platform" for the extremist movement al-Muhajiroun.


Read more: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/wiltshire/8438915.stm

...if they go around acting like Fred Phelps.

"He said the event, if permitted by police, would involve peaceful "symbolic coffins" being carried to honour Muslim victims of the conflict in Afghanistan.

He said the event, if permitted by police, would involve peaceful "symbolic coffins" being carried to honour Muslim victims of the conflict in Afghanistan.

Mr Choudary said: "The procession is not actually about the people of Wootton Bassett and it never was about them.

"We are having a procession, it's in Wootton Bassett but it's not about the people there and it's not against them personally - rather it's to highlight the real cost of war in Afghanistan."


"The sad reality of the situation is that if I were to hold it somewhere else it would not have the media attention that it has now.

"If I am to balance between the sensitivity of having it in Wootton Bassett and the possibility of continuing the quagmire and cycle of death in Afghanistan, then quite honestly I'm going to balance in favour of the latter.

"In the next couple of weeks, I'm going to be engaging with the local community and the public at large by way of press releases and letters to explain why we're having this march."

It's the mainly the locals there who turn out to show respect for those who have died in action and I'm guessing they'll just stay at home out of distaste.

...of idiots such as the English Defence League turning up for a "counter-demontration".

He wants publicity for himself (sad to see the BBC giving the wanker publicity by interviewing him); and the 'defence league' and similar groups want publicity and trouble.

I hadn't accounted for them.

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

its looking more and more like this group wants a confrontation and i would bet that they will get it, you might not see the difference between the squaddies and the muslims but you can bet the people who welcome the squaddies home will.

The fact that some other group might try to silence them was reason for additional police protection. It is not reason to silence anyone who is marching without violence.

If members of either side misbehave, arrest them. Otherwise, it's very important speech and should not be silenced.

A group using Muslim deaths (that they don't seem to have a huge problem with when they are suicide bombers) for political means is not really remembering them for respect's sake though.

These are the people who were not too happy about freedom of speech when some people dared to print newspapers depicting Mohammed in a certain way. Now they think its time for freedom of speech to be important again ?

Nah.

You know, the ones who use dead soldiers as a means to stifle criticism of any policy they support? "Support the troops"? These are the same people who get upset at atheist billboards or - heaven forbid - a sci-fi movie about giant blue people trying to deal with interstellar imperialism?

We still let them suck their teabags, we let them hold office, and they're all over the news programs.

But I guess that since they're not Muslim, that's all cool. But the minute someone syas "Allah" hoo boy! :eyes:

After all, when it comes right down to it, Islam4UK is an extremist group that seeks to destroy Britain's institutions and replace them with Islamic ones. The Tea Party folks might have a different interpretation of the Constitution, but they're still relying on it as the basis for their beliefs. That's a pretty striking difference, IMO.

And even if you want to pretend that the Teabaggers are swell guys who are a little misguided... well, we let the Aryan nations hold rallies too.

As much as I dislike Islam4UK there's no doubt that they have the right to hold their march.

They can march if they want. I find their views to be counter to any kind of liberal ideal, but they must be allowed to express them.

However they cannot turn that place into a political battleground. It is different to any other place in the country.

Hell, you live in a country where you cannot even jog through Arlington Cemetery and you think it is OK for a group of political and religiouss extremeists to turn something that is fast assuming even greater importance to this country into some zoo suitable for pulling some cheap stunt ?

Nah.

This a piece written about Wootton Bassett last year

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/personal-view/5771032/Wootton-Bassett-A-very-British-way-of-mourning.html

When Fred Phelps is allowed to protest at Arlington you can lecture us about "freedom of speech" until then, don't expect us to listen.

"When Fred Phelps is allowed to protest at Arlington you can lecture us about "freedom of speech" until then, don't expect us to listen."

I guess that the people defending Islam4UK/Al-Muhajiroun have never even heard of Wooton Bassett before today.

After all, more Muslim blood is being spilled by insurgents in Iraq than by coalition forces, same in Pakistan.

Even talking about doing it would probably be grounds for arrest. Actually doing it--who knows?

How dare those vile evil Muslims suppress freedom of speech, right?

Thankfully Great Britain's got higher democratic standards than Saudi Arabia. Though I'm perplexed as to why even so many on DU think we should make exceptions for one particular religion.

When you see folks hiding behind the law to spread a message that, if carried out, would deny you your rights, it tends to make people a little squeemish.

This issue has been heating up for some time now. In example, when a homecoming parade was held in Luton in March, Islamic radicals held a counter-rally at the event, carrying signs that read "Anglian soldiers go to hell", shouting "rapists" and "baby killers", etc.

Do they have the right to do these things? Sure.

Is it distasteful and a slap in the face of the country that allowed (yes, allowed) many of them and their families to immigrate there? Absolutely.

The Luton demonstrators are currently on trial:



Choudary is similary likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress, and it will be his main (perhaps only) reason for the march.

Unless they're white or christian, when you'll let them say whatever the fuck they want.

Yeah. The "Why" is pretty self-explanatory alright.

As far as I'm concerned, they have the right to march. I think it's distasteful, I think it's a slap in Britain's face, and I think it will further hurt the public standing of Muslims in Britain, but it is also within this group's rights.

Also, hey, love it or hate it, there is a certain logic to peoples' desire to see this march banned. There's an old punk rock song that states this reasoning pretty clearly: "don't give them their freedom because they're not going to give you yours". The song is about beating down fascism wherever it sprouts up, but you get the idea. Again, not my personal belief, but I do see how people can arrive at that conclusion.

"Some people are saying!" "It's a joke!" "I'm just saying what I've heard" Blah blah blah.

Hmmf.

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

on their parade

It will be videotaped to show how bad the UK treats them.

Psy-ops.

It seems they're assuming this can play out one of two ways: either they're denied the right to march or they're allowed to march and the public's reaction is violent. Either way, they will turn around and portray themselves as some poor, oppressed minority, thus gaining sympathizers.

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

Then, publish the march, if even doing that, in the "want ads" section.

"Anjem Choudary, of Islam4UK, admitted the town had been chosen because it would attract the most media attention."

Don't give him the attention (think Fred Phelps) or do so in such a way that is embarrassing, other than their bigotry.

when people demand rights that they themselves would never grant to opposing view holders if the situation were reversed.

Julie

when people who claim to respect 'freedom of speech', advocate denying it to others.

My position allows me to condemn religious extremism and support a right to speak freely, without appearing hypocritical.

After all, I'm in agreement with your position, but still see the irony in Islam4UK exercising its rights under the very system it seeks to destroy and replace.

I'm sorry, but there is no way on this earth that an Al-Muhajiroun front group can ever be described as anything other then extremist.

Show me it's own spokespersons calling it "extremist" or admit that it is possible for someone to not call it that. I'm sure they think their views are not only correct but what everyone ought to think.

The debate here about him and his group is basically on whether they should be banned, or just ignored and denied the oxygen of publicity. Not about whether he's extremist. E.g. he wants Sharia law adopted in Britain for everyone (not just Muslims); called the 9-11 perpetrators 'magnificent martyrs'; and refused to condemn the London bombers in July 2005.

The Muslim Council of Britain and affiliated groups have condemned Choudary and his group (though opposing an outright ban), and do describe them and their activities as 'extremist'.

http://www.mcb.org.uk/media/presstext.php?ann_id=382

www.theasiantoday.com/article.aspx?articleId=1624

http://cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx?q=british+council+of+muslims+and+islam4uk&d=5042824238924826&mkt=en-GB&setlang=en-GB&w=6d7791c0,5f9c1148


On his part, he has accused the Muslim Council of Britain of 'selling their souls to the devil' for their condemnations of terrorist attacks.


Salma Yaqoob is a British Muslim, an anti-war activist, and a leader of Respect (the party founded by Galloway). She describes Choudary as a 'bigot whose goal in life is to create divisions':


http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/jan/05/wootton-bassett-salma-yaqoob


Come to think of it, I think he would have a certain amount in common with a bloke by the name of Pat Robertson!

Read this transcript and see if you think Choudary is an extremist or not: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0707/01/siu.02.html

Sample: " Whoever insults Islam or insults the Prophet Mohammad deserves capital punishment!"

That would be my opinion if I held it, but I do not, so clearly not everyone has to think that.

Maybe that's a British-only usage (though I didn't think it was), but it means less than 'absolutely everyone'. I'd say you're very rare if you don't think someone who supports bin Laden and the London Underground bombings is an extremist.

Thank f**k for that!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8451014.stm

A radical Islamic group has cancelled plans to hold an anti-war march through a town famous for honouring the UK's servicemen and women killed abroad.

Members of Islam4UK had planned to march through Wootton Bassett, Wiltshire, to honour Muslims killed in the Afghanistan conflict.

The group denied members had planned to carry 500 empty coffins through the town. Islam4UK had previously said it had chosen Wootton Bassett to create maximum publicity.

The News of the World reported on Sunday that Home Secretary Alan Johnson would outlaw the group on Monday.