Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Newsweek: Saddam's Links To 9/11? How the Pentagon Made Its Case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 02:55 PM
Original message
Newsweek: Saddam's Links To 9/11? How the Pentagon Made Its Case
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/4523156/

Where did Vice President Dick Cheney and other administration hard-liners get the information they used to make controversial comments linking Saddam Hussein to Al Qaeda and 9/11? One principal source was a slide show, classified "Top Secret/Codeword," prepared by an obscure Pentagon policy unit nicknamed "Team B." The office, originally composed of two analysts (one of whom, David Wurmser, now works as a Mideast adviser to Cheney), was assigned shortly after 9/11 to pore through raw intelligence reports looking for data CIA analysts might have missed, linking foreign governments to terrorist groups like Al Qaeda. After two months of research, Team B came up with an elaborate presentation, more than two hours long, suggesting that Hizbullah and Al Qaeda jointly sponsored the 9/11 attacks with likely support from several governments, including Iran, Iraq and Saudi Arabia (whose royal family was allegedly implicated).

<snip>

The slide show was presented to top Pentagon officials, including Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, in summer 2002. In August, Pentagon officials traveled to CIA headquarters to present the briefing to CIA Director George Tenet and aides; the slide that criticized CIA methods was omitted from this presentation. In September, a Pentagon briefer gave the presentation to White House national-security officials, including Condoleezza Rice's deputy, Steven Hadley. Cheney's chief of staff, Lewis (Scooter) Libby, sat in for part of the presentation. Officials close to the CIA now say the agency was "underwhelmed" by the presentation, many of whose key points—including the Atta meeting in Prague—have been widely discredited. Even some Pentagon officials acknowledge that the allegation about Saddam's training Arab terrorists is not supported by evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Could the 'B' in Team B stand for bullshit?
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. bogus?
Black propaganda?

below normal?

Blatant lies?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. ha
A spokesman for the National Security Council said that the slide show had "no effect on Mr. Hadley's thinking. He receives his intelligence information from the CIA."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fearnobush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. There all full of shit.
All of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. sounds like an episode of "Spy vs Spy" from MAD. The omission of
the criticism of the CIA in one presentation is interesting. I think Rummy fosters inter agency tensions to further his own interests....duh, what an understatement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrBB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. A nickname with a pedigree
Edited on Sun Mar-14-04 04:43 PM by DrBB
"Team B" was the nickname for the group--which included many of today's prominent neocons--that was formed during the Reagan years when reichwingers thought the CIA was soft-pedalling the threat from the USSR. Sound familiar? They came out with a much scarier analysis of the Soviets' economic and military strength than what the CIA was saying, projecting dire cataclysms if we didn't act to stop 'em!

And of course they were dead wrong--the Soviet Empire was rotting from the head down and the inside out, and fell apart of its own contradictions and inefficiencies around the time Team B (which included one Richard Perlle, among other familiar faces) had predicted they'd have the US surrounded and helpless. Never anybody as wrong--and as unable to recognize it--as these guys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC