Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FBI Broke Law for Years in Phone Record Searches

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 11:04 PM
Original message
FBI Broke Law for Years in Phone Record Searches
Edited on Mon Jan-18-10 11:07 PM by Hissyspit
Source: Washington Post

FBI broke law for years in phone record searches

By John Solomon and Carrie Johnson
Special to The Washington Post
Tuesday, January 19, 2010

The FBI illegally collected more than 2,000 U.S. telephone call records between 2002 and 2006 by invoking terrorism emergencies that did not exist or simply persuading phone companies to provide records, according to internal bureau memos and interviews. FBI officials issued approvals after the fact to justify their actions.

E-mails obtained by The Washington Post detail how counterterrorism officials inside FBI headquarters did not follow their own procedures that were put in place to protect civil liberties. The stream of urgent requests for phone records also overwhelmed the FBI communications analysis unit with work that ultimately was not connected to imminent threats.

A Justice Department inspector general's report due out this month is expected to conclude that the FBI frequently violated the law with its emergency requests, bureau officials confirmed.

The records seen by The Post do not reveal the identities of the people whose phone call records were gathered, but FBI officials said they thought that nearly all of the requests involved terrorism investigations.

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/18/AR2010011803982.html?hpid=topnews
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flying Dream Blues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hardly a surprise, but gee I'm sure it was worth it since
it kept us safe from terra.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 06:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
22. Man I need coffee
I first read that as 'it kept us safe from tuna' LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flying Dream Blues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #22
33. Well, I wouldn't want to make one mad, fer sure!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thing is, what are WE doing about story after story like this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnyxCollie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Don't worry.
Senator Obama voted to expand surveillance and give immunity to telecommunication companies. It's all good now.

With some adjustment to your principles, two plus two can equal three, four, five, or all of the above, depending on the situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 02:04 AM
Response to Reply #6
15. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheEuclideanOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 02:36 AM
Response to Reply #3
16. Is that crickets I hear?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
38. nothing. same thing we did the whole time
during the fascist takeover.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clear eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
40. There is something that can be done.
See my post #39 below.

BTW, to all the snarksters responding to this story, this sort of wholesale listening in particularly affects our ability to get news of gov't misdeeds by allowing monitoring of reporters' communications w/o any criminal wrongdoing on the part of the reporter or the source of a story disagreeable to the gov't. If we want to do more than complain about a neutered MSM, we have to protect them and their sources by supporting the proposed law. Link in post #39.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. no shit.


k&r :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. Hardly surprising...
As a target of CoIntelPro I can assure you that the FBI makes a living breaking the law...

As does the entire criminal-injustice system...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. News would be a year they didn't break the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoapBox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. Well, DUH!
...like this is a surprise?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Dawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. Kick for truth. Most were probably just people who publicly oppose the Iraq War.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. Recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. And Obama's "justice" department is still behind immunity for this criminal behavior.
Edited on Tue Jan-19-10 12:00 AM by PSPS
So don't expect them to do anything about this evidence of FBI (part of the "Justice Department") malfeasance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Irish_shark Donating Member (133 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
11. I am 100% confident that President Obama will prosecute the culprits n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheEuclideanOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 02:37 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. Can't do that... have to look forward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinrobot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
12. How many of these illegal searches were on journalists and Democrats?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clear eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #12
41. Exactly. Folks think that b/c they are law-abiding it doesn't affect them.
But neutering the press by getting the identity of sources for important stories embarrassing to the gov't affects us all. Wholesale wiretapping w/o cause allows the gov't to do that. If the gov't is going off-course, we need to know about it in time to exert pressure to correct it. It also allows officials to get leverage on individual reporters by overhearing evidence of, say, an illicit affair or habitual gambling. This is w/o doubt unreasonable search from which we are supposed to be protected by the Fourth Amendment and a violation of freedom of the press, a protection of the First Amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
14. FBI broke law for years in phone record searches
Source: The Washington Post

The FBI illegally collected more than 2,000 U.S. telephone call records between 2002 and 2006 by invoking terrorism emergencies that did not exist or simply persuading phone companies to provide records, according to internal bureau memos and interviews. FBI officials issued approvals after the fact to justify their actions.

E-mails obtained by The Washington Post detail how counterterrorism officials inside FBI headquarters did not follow their own procedures that were put in place to protect civil liberties. The stream of urgent requests for phone records also overwhelmed the FBI communications analysis unit with work that ultimately was not connected to imminent threats.

A Justice Department inspector general's report due out this month is expected to conclude that the FBI frequently violated the law with its emergency requests, bureau officials confirmed.

>snip

Caproni said FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III did not know about the problems until late 2006 or early 2007, after the inspector general's probe began.


Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/18/AR2010011803982.html?hpid%3Dtopnews&sub=AR



According to the article, which is long, there will be a decision made about whether any disciplinary measures are necessary.

People whose civil rights were violated probably don't have any recourse now because of the FISA BIll.

It looks like one more crime will go unpunished from the Bush era.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #14
24. Oooh! Disciplinary measures!
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 03:53 AM
Response to Original message
18. Shocked!
There is gambling going on in this establishment.................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DissedByBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 03:55 AM
Response to Original message
19. They need to notify the victims
So they can sue the bejeezus out of the FBI, and the agents personally, for civil rights violations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 05:35 AM
Response to Original message
20. K&R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 06:25 AM
Response to Original message
21. And we expected something else?
Given free rein under bush/cheney, many of the Rights and Privileges we took for granted...vanished.

The did it all through fear...naked unbridled fear. FWIW, that fear was based on essentially nothing other than what they could dream up to subjugate the citizens into a compliant mass that would look to two of this country's worst citizens to "lead" them.

There are times when I have to wonder about our collective sanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
23. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
25. Sounds tip-of-the-iceberg-ish. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mahatmakanejeeves Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
26. "By John Solomon and Carrie Johnson"
This must surely be the John Solomon who just got the axe at the Washington Times. You might recognize his name; it has appeared at DU before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
27. So what is their penalty?
Edited on Tue Jan-19-10 10:18 AM by The Backlash Cometh
Do these people they wronged get renumeration?

I hope so, because I figure I stand to make some money out of these intrustions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnyxCollie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. Good luck with that.
After the last FISA bill, any civil suit will likely be tossed.

If the President approves it, it's legal. If it's legal, no damages. No damages, no renumeration.

Thank Senator Jello Jay Rockefeller and all the others who received campaign contributions (as well as Obama) for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
29. So, nothing will become of this matter
SO what if this is revealed now.. If no one is held accountable then so what.. They could reveal every single illegal activity committed by the Bush administration and nothing would become of such activity. Its utterly disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
30. WOW! Nice of John SOLOMON To Finally Get Off His Ass and Report on Fed Misdeeds
Edited on Tue Jan-19-10 11:45 AM by NashVegas
Too freaking bad he had to wait until a Dem was in office, huh?

Or is it just that he couldn't find anything negative to write about Howard Dean anymore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
31. Nothing shocking here
Was there anyone that ever expected the FBI to follow the law in this regard?

Americans should simply understand that many parts of the Bill Of Roghts are now completely and forever null and void thanks to GW Bush and President Obama. Everyone should understand that Obama is a major player in the new reality of total surveillance. Because he did not address these issues after taking office, they have become precedent and will be used from here after by the executive branch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinniped Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
32. I think a very sternly worded letter or grilling is in order.
A threat of either one will be enough to make the guilty quiver.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
34. corruption is corruption
it is present in all facets of this government. I'm the least surprised to read about the FBI doing this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mulehead Donating Member (93 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
35. FBI 'fabricated terror emergencies to get phone records'
Source: Guardian UK

FBI 'fabricated terror emergencies to get phone records'
Chris McGreal in Washington
guardian.co.uk, Tuesday 19 January 2010 20.06 GMT

Justice department to accuse FBI of invoking crises to obtain details of more than 2,000 calls, Washington Post reports

The US justice department is preparing a report which concludes that the FBI repeatedly broke the law by invoking terrorism emergencies that did not exist to obtain more than 2,000 telephone call records over four years from 2002, including those of journalists on US newspapers, according to emails obtained by the Washington Post.

The bureau also issued authorisations for the seizure of records after the fact, in order to justify unwarranted seizures.

The Washington Post said the emails show how counter-terrorism ­officials inside FBI headquarters breached regulations designed to protect civil liberties.

The FBI's general counsel, Valerie Caproni, told the Washington Post that the agency violated privacy laws by inventing non-existent terrorist threats to justify collecting the phone records. "We should have stopped those requests from being made that way," she said.

Read more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/jan/19/fbi-terror-emergencies-phone-calls
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TroglodyteScholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Does this surprise anyone?
Recommended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
37. yes, but a nude model took teddy's seat today
so please don't talk about the fact that the fascists have already taken over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clear eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
39. The Nat'l Whistelblowers Ctr is asking us to support H.R. 1507 to protect the agent who broke this.
As things stand now, FBI director Mueller is permitted to fire the agent. Link to online letter in support of H.R. 1507 to increase protections for whistleblowers, which in turn increases our protection against gov't and contractor misdeeds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC