Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House forecast: no roaring economic recovery in 2010

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
The Northerner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-11-10 12:56 PM
Original message
White House forecast: no roaring economic recovery in 2010
Source: Christian Science Monitor

The White House predicted modest growth in its annual economic forecast, warning that a revival of job growth may not bring a big decline in unemployment.

Christina Romer, President Obama's chief economist, forecast average job growth of 95,000 jobs per month. That target is in line with many private forecasts, though the government's monthly job tally has yet to shift from negative to positive.

The report follows a year when Ms. Romer and the Council of Economic Advisers, which she heads, had proved too rosy in their forecasting. Unemployment shot up to 10 percent in 2009, well above White House predictions.

The current Economic Report of the President may err on the side of caution. Often after a deep recession the economy is able to generate a stronger rebound than the 3 percent growth rate the report calls for in 2010. Last month, the unemployment rate dipped to 9.7 percent, from 10 percent. And some private forecasters believe that job growth could soon begin, reaching a pace of 200,000 to 300,000 jobs per month.

Romer and her team acknowledge the uncertainty surrounding any forecast, noting that the recovery could also prove more disappointing than they predict.

Read more: http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2010/0211/White-House-forecast-no-roaring-economic-recovery-in-2010
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-11-10 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's a "no shit" headline. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-11-10 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. or 11 or 12 or
For Main Street.

But they'll keep funneling money to Wall Street hoping it eventually trickles down.

Thats a nice change from the past, isnt it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-11-10 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. So, that calls for a much bigger jobs bill
Even though Baucus is seemingly trying to kill whatever is out there now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue neen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-11-10 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. Thank you for your daily positive posts.
Edited on Thu Feb-11-10 01:39 PM by blue neen
What would we do without them?

edited for typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-11-10 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. Oh, I geddit. "Modest growth" = "total disasterous failure".
Sheesh.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-12-10 03:06 AM
Response to Original message
6. White House report forecasts tepid job growth this year
Source: Washington Post

The president's advisers say they were intentionally conservative in developing the forecast, and think the situation could be improved through legislation being considered in Congress aimed at generating jobs.

"There is a lot of uncertainty," said Christina Romer, chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, in an interview. "As we still don't know what form any further targeted initiatives on jobs might take. I think something along the lines of a new jobs tax credit could have tremendous upside potential and really ignite private sector hiring."

The document frames the nation's great economic challenge over the coming years as one of rebalancing -- a notion many economists across the ideological spectrum tend to agree with -- so that the economy is driven more by exports and business investment, and less so by housing, consumer spending and financial engineering.

It also contains a bit of chest-thumping about the role of the Obama administration's policies in helping get an economic recovery going. "Even as we worked to address the crises in our banking sector, in our housing market, and in our auto industry, we also began attacking our economic crisis on a broader front," President Obama wrote in a letter presenting the report to Congress, referring to the $787 billion stimulus bill enacted a year ago. "Because of these and other steps, we can safely say that we've avoided the depression many feared."

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/11/AR2010021104655.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-12-10 03:07 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. And once again the Democratic party rolls over
and exposes their soft underbelly to a GOP that feels no restraint in tearing them apart to win an election this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-12-10 03:07 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. white house report forecasts HUGH republican gains in midterm selections.
is what it might as well say.

obama has been an even bigger disappointment than clinton ever was.

what a useless turd of a potus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC