|
Edited on Thu Feb-25-10 05:37 PM by happyslug
In fact the German Offensive doctrine emphasized Infantry and armor movement, as opposed to the Western Allies that emphasized Artillery and Air Support. The net difference is less Civilian causalities under the German Doctrine. This doctrine also meant the Western Allies preferred big planes that carried a lot of bombs (and when dropped one of the bombs would hit the target while most would miss and hit civilians) as opposed to Dive Bombers where the pilots made sure their one bomb hit the target.
As to being Anti-Semitic, that was know to all, but that had been a characteristic of Europe since at least the time of Martin Luther and had NEVER before ended up in mass murder (Massive discrimination prior to WWII but no mass murder). Furthermore you had the residue of the WWI English propaganda reports of "Bayoneting Belgium Babies" i.e. that the Germans were using babies in Belgium for Bayonet training. No truth to these reports, but extensive during WWI determined by Congressional hearings in the early 1930s to be completely false. Given that background most people dismissed the reports of the Death Camps as propaganda till the Russian freed one in 1944 AND even that was dismissed as Soviet Propaganda till Dachau in Germany was liberated by US Troops in 1945 (Dachau was the only Death Camp in Germany only, the rest were in Poland, Please note Dachau had been a concentration camp since the mid 1930s, its Death Camp part was quite small, unlike the true death camps that were just large killing factories). Thus not only the full extent of the Holocaust was unknown till 1945, but the idea of such mass murder had also been dismissed before 1945.
My point to assume a young 20 something soldier starving, ill-clothed and ill-sheltered in a POW camp would know the extent of the Mass Murder is a huge step. Most Americans of the time period (We are talking pre-1945) did not know of it for reports of the mass murder had been routinely dismissed as just anti-German propaganda. Now some of the people in the higher echelon of the US Government had hints of the extent, but even they were shocked when the true extent came out. As to a private in a POW camp, he prob ally never even heard of it.
By all accounts, Demenjuk took up an offer given to Soviet Soldiers held in POW Camps run by the Germans, to join the SS as a axillary Guard. No one claims Demenjuk KNEW what he was agreeing to do when he volunteered AND both sides admit that once he was at the camp he could NOT quit. The Defense says that is enough to show any lack of intention on the part of Demenjuk to participate is such crimes. You have to show Demenjuk did something more then show up and did what he was told to do by others, when those others had the power of life and death over him.
The Prosecution, on the other hand, has adopted a broader definition of War Criminal, basically he was at the camp and that all that is needed to be proved. In this view Demenjuk could have been a prisoner forced to be at the camp and that still makes him a war criminal. Your view that by 1942 people knew what the Nazis were is unsupported in the historical record. No findings of war crimes would found till AFTER the Russian Offensive that pushed back the Germans from the suburbs of Moscow in December 1941 (and even these reports were dismissed as propaganda or just the acts of a few bad people). In fact the German troops that invaded France in 1940 acted much better then their fathers had done in 1914 (Poland was a different story). In fact when the Germans invaded Yugoslavia in the Spring of 1941, the Germans released almost all of the Yugoslavia Soldiers they took as POWs in that campaign (Yes, just released them, more to free German Troops for the upcoming invasion of Russia in June 1941 then any other reason, but the POWs had been treated fairly unlike the situation in the POW camps for captured Soviet Soldiers from June 1941-December 1941).
Yes, it is common knowledge today of the extent of the Nazi Crimes, but those were NOT known during the war itself. The worse people thought was an occasional murder of a Jew and massive discrimination but nothing that would not see 99% of the Jews surviving the war. That had been the norm for almost 1000 years throughout Europe when it came to ant-Semitic movements. No one thought anyone would set up a program for mass extermination (and in the worse case in pre-Hitler 20the Century Europe, the Turks when it came to the Armenians just used rifle fire and other direct actions, which the SS found in 1941 to be a less effective way to kill Jews, rather then set up something like the Death Camps (In fact when it came to direct operations Demenjuk would have been in a better position to help the victims simply by NOT shooting them, an option the SS Deliberately denied to the Guards in how the camps were set up).
Back to my point, to assume a young 20 something man in a German POW Camp knew anything of the Death Camps is beyond reason. Demenjuk agreed to be a guard at some sort of camp to hold people, but what the camp did with those people was NOT told to him or any of the other Guards. None of the Guards were in a position to stop the operation of the Death Camps nor where any of them essential to its operation (Except as guards to keep the victims in the camp). To punish someone like Demenjuk is like burning down one of the Buildings of the Death Camp, if the burning is intended to "Punished" that building for being part of the Camp. Such an act would be stupid for the Building did NO positive act to keep the camp running, but it was an essential part of the camp, to store the food, the loot, to house the guards and the victims spared immediate death and we may even include the building where the actual deaths occurred. These were all essential for operation of the Death Camp, but none of them had anything to do with setting up the death camp, getting the victims to the camps, or even killing the victims. The same with the Ukrainian guards, they were part of the camp, but had nothing to do with setting up the death camp, getting the victims to the camps, or even killing the victims. To go after someone like Demenjuk is like going after one of the building of the Death Camps, symbolic more then any real justice for real justice meant going after the people who plan, set the victims to, and operated the Camps (and most of those people died of natural causes in their own bed years ago).
|