Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge slams WTC proposed settlement, orders new deal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 03:42 PM
Original message
Judge slams WTC proposed settlement, orders new deal
Edited on Fri Mar-19-10 04:28 PM by cal04
Source: Newsday

A settlement proposed last week for thousands of injured ground zero workers who sued New York City is insufficient, a Manhattan federal judge said Friday.

Ordering a renegotiation of the deal Friday, U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein said the proposal announced last week involving up to $657 million and endorsed by New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, "is not enough."

The city also should pay the plaintiffs' legal costs, Hellerstein said in a court hearing he scheduled to hear from victims and give his own views on the fairness of the plan.

(snip)
After hearing from several ground zero first responders and cleanup workers, Hellerstein blasted the agreement, which was the result of negotiations between attorneys for the plaintiffs, the city, about 140 contractors and the WTC Captive Insurance Company. It set up an administrative process to pay thousands or millions of dollars to police, firefighters and other workers depending on the severity of their injuries.

Read more: http://www.newsday.com/news/judge-slams-wtc-proposed-settlement-orders-new-deal-1.1820426



http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/2010/03/19/2010-03-19_judge_in_911_health_trial_orders_city_lawyers_to_renegotiate_settlement_for_grou.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Christine Todd Whitman said the air was safe to breathe...
It wasn't. And she knew it. And, if that administration could do that to first responders, HEROES!, then what else were they capable of doing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
young_at_heart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It's Bush's fault according to her
She said that she was addressing residents of Lower Manhattan — not workers at ground zero. This was in her testimony to Congress in 2007. In April 2008 the US Court of Appeals said that Whitman had based her information on contradictory information and statements from President Bush. The U.S. Department of Justice had argued that holding the agency liable would establish a risky legal precedent because future public officials would be afraid to make public statements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Let's not forget Rudy Guiliani, then Mayor of New York City. The first responders
worked for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zoeisright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Yep, another fuckiing lying repuke.
Well, that is all they do - lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bloomberg, another elitist that thinks it's okay to toss change at the great unwashed
Even when those unwashed spent days looking for survivors in the towers. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. BBC News link
Federal Judge Alvin Hellerstein said that he did not think the agreement represented a sufficient sum of money.
>
Mr Hellerstein said the injured workers should be able to know the approximate value of the cash award they might receive before deciding whether or not they should accept the settlement.
>
He added that he was concerned that too much of the final sum would be eaten up by legal fees.

Under the current deal, lawyers' fees may be drawn from a $1bn fund set aside by federal government to cover the claims.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/8577491.stm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Here's another BBC link:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC