Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Russia: U.S. Aiding Afghan Drug Trade

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
cory777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 12:09 AM
Original message
Russia: U.S. Aiding Afghan Drug Trade
Edited on Mon Mar-29-10 02:43 PM by proud patriot
Source: Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty

(edited for copyright purposes-proud patriot moderator Democratic Underground)

March 28, 2010
Russia has accused the United States of "conniving" with Afghan drug producers by not destroying opium crops as U.S. troops advance in Helmand Province, one of the major opium growing regions.



Read more: http://www.rferl.org/content/Russia_Says_US_Colluding_With_Afghan_Drug_Trade/1995972.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. We need moral admonitions from Russia
like we need another butthole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. yeah, and we really need their advice on how to suceed in Afghanistan
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flaxbee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. actually, we should have paid very close attention to the
Soviet experience in Afghanistan. And asked them for advice - the only people who knew Afghanistan better than the Afghanis was the Russians.

If the Russians couldn't do it, we can't do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I din't know about advice, but we should have learned from their mistakes.
I agree with your conclusion though.

Let's see, isn't that where we armed and trained Bin Laden and his buddies? Why, yes...it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 03:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. They led the way on how to succeed
They pulled out and kept all of the geological surveys for future use when the USA has the sense to pull out too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jakeXT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #11
23. Obama says US won't quit war in Afghanistan
'The United States of America does not quit once we start on something,' Obama told the US soldiers in his speech, which was aired on Afghan TV.

http://www.monstersandcritics.com/news/southasia/news/article_1544345.php/Obama-says-US-won-t-quit-war-in-Afghanistan-3rd-Roundup


good luck with that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #23
27. Yup - they pretended to pull out of Beirut in 1984
as a follow up to the 1983 barracks bombing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
32. Exactly
.
.
.

Get the fuck out!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 06:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
14. What's relevant is whether they are lying or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cirque du So-What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. CIA's black ops ain't gonna finance themselves, yunno!
During the early stages of the invasion of Afghanistan, I recall reading that the Taliban had nearly eradicated opium crop in that country, as they believed its production ran counter to the proper practice of Islam. After the US invasion, however, the northern alliance of tribes (under the aegis of coalition forces) encouraged the replanting of opium poppies in earnest, and it's been that way ever since - even in lands that the Taliban has regained.

My memory could be faulty, however, so please correct me if I'm wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proletariatprincess Donating Member (527 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Thats my recollection too.
War on drugs...war on terror...they are convenient and interchangeable now that the Cold War is over and their aren't any Commies under our beds. It is all pretext for criminal foreign policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 06:59 AM
Response to Reply #4
15. Just think how many jobs have been created by those 2 fake wars, though.
Edited on Mon Mar-29-10 07:01 AM by No Elephants
It's like FDR's New Deal, only pure evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. That's what I heard or read, too, but for all I know, that could have been
BushCo airbrushing the Taliban while it looked like they would negotiate the pipeline deal.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 04:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. Your memory is correct
The first war after 911 was for heroin, the second for oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rapier09 Donating Member (209 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 01:45 AM
Response to Original message
5. Yeah but then we'd be achieving something
We don't want to do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 02:11 AM
Response to Original message
9. cory777
Please be aware that DU copyright rules require that excerpts of copyrighted material be limited; and in this case to only a brief excerpt., It must also include a link to the original source.

Thank you.
DU Moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 02:14 AM
Response to Original message
10. And Russia is right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
13. bbc newsbeat...may 1 2008
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
16. Why don't we just buy the poppy crops, or pay them to grow something else?
Edited on Mon Mar-29-10 07:10 AM by No Elephants
And do the same elsewhere in the world.

Too sane?

It would be much cheaper than the war on drugs, not to mention preventing so much damage to our kids, adults, property, etc. And prison costs.

But, it wouldn't serve the purposes stated in Reply #4.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melm00se Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. I remember
a novel with that as the central premise. The end result was that rather than having the drugs destroyed they were smuggled into the US and resold with the profits lining the pockets of an evil cabal of rogue intelligence agents.

I could see that happening in this real world case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pjt7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 07:43 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Forget thet Russis is pointing this out
it's true.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
think Donating Member (316 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #16
24. No need for morphine in the medical world?
Edited on Mon Mar-29-10 08:43 AM by think
I realize it's a can of worms and a very simplistic idea but paying for the poppy crop and making medical morphine for third world hospitals would seem like a great humanitarian compromise.

This is from Wikipedia:


Access to morphine in poor countries

Although morphine is cheap, people in poorer countries often do not have access to it. According to a 2005 estimate by the International Narcotics Control Board, six countries (Australia, Britain, Canada, France, Germany, and the United States) consume 79 percent of the world’s morphine. The less affluent countries, accounting for 80 percent of the world's population, consumed only about 6 percent of the global morphine supply. Some countries import virtually no morphine, and in others the drug is rarely available even for relieving severe pain while dying.

Experts in pain management attribute the under-distribution of morphine to an unwarranted fear of the drug's potential for addiction and abuse. While morphine is clearly addictive, Western doctors believe it is worthwhile to use the drug and then wean the patient off when the treatment is over.<53>


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morphine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #24
29. I can just see the posts on DU if we went this route.
"The CIA is getting women and children in developing nations hooked on morphine, under the guise of medical treatment!!11!" :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #16
31. Because the logic of prohibition doesn't work that way.
If the government will pay you X for your Opium (or for the privilege of you not growing opium, for that matter,) then the opium is worth X + Y on the open market. If the government doubles what it will pay to 2X, then the opium is worth 2X + Y. In both cases, Y = the premium that purchasers are willing to pay for the stuff on account of its illegality.

Long story short, being a heroin addict is already illegal in virtually every country on earth. And yet there are heroin addicts (and the people who supply them) among us still. There is no evidence whatever that yet another round of prohibitionist fervor will do the trick. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
19. Russia burned crops, we're trying a different approach.
...Now all of a sudden we're meant to follow Russia's advice on Afghanistan?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newfie11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
20. This wouldn't surprise me at all n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
21. And we should believe the idiots in the Kremlin WHY?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. It's 100% true that we're not burning the crops any more.
Edited on Mon Mar-29-10 08:26 AM by Robb
...The only question is how it benefits Russia to point it out. I'm not sure.

Edited to add: good discussion of the issue toward the end of this article: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/21/world/asia/21marja.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flaneur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. Russia is suffering rising heroin addiction rates.
And 30,000 dead junkies a year, if I recall correctly.

Iran is having the same sorts of problems with Afghan heroin. And so is Pakistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlphaCentauri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #21
28. Becouse we have the experience, Oliver North
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #28
33. Britain's government ran the opium trade in the 19th century--remember the Opium War?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
26. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
30. Let Russia fight it's own War on Drugs; we've already lost ours. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
34. some background on the drug trade, governments, & Wall Street
A former British ambassador to Uzbekistan, which borders Afghanistan described the open production of opium, open manufacture into heroin, and open export from the country.

That is about the only good thing you can say about the Taliban; there are plenty of very bad things to say about them. But their suppression of the opium trade and the drug barons is undeniable fact.

Now we are occupying the country, that has changed. According to the United Nations, 2006 was the biggest opium harvest in history, smashing the previous record by 60 per cent. This year will be even bigger.

Our economic achievement in Afghanistan goes well beyond the simple production of raw opium. In fact Afghanistan no longer exports much raw opium at all. It has succeeded in what our international aid efforts urge every developing country to do. Afghanistan has gone into manufacturing and 'value-added' operations.

It now exports not opium, but heroin. Opium is converted into heroin on an industrial scale, not in kitchens but in factories. Millions of gallons of the chemicals needed for this process are shipped into Afghanistan by tanker. The tankers and bulk opium lorries on the way to the factories share the roads, improved by American aid, with Nato troops.


Murray doesn't go into detail about which US and UK officials and ultimately banks that launder the drug money might be benefiting from the drug trade, but he does give a helpful analogy of what happened to a Russian whistleblower on their part of the drug trade:

http://professorsmartass.blogspot.com/2010/03/who-profits-from-afghanistans-opium.html">The rest of the story...

http://professorsmartass.blogspot.com/2009/02/were-fighting-to-hold-afghanistan.html">More on our pipeline & poppies war
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC