Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Whitman accused of manipulating media with video feeds

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 07:26 PM
Original message
Whitman accused of manipulating media with video feeds
Source: Contra Costa Times

SACRAMENTO — Meg Whitman's campaign opponents are accusing her of trying to manipulate the media by providing selective footage of a campaign event to television stations around the state.

In what appears to be an unprecedented campaign tactic in California politics, Whitman has advised television stations in all markets that she'll be providing footage for events they are unable to attend for the rest of the campaign. The campaign sent its first footage Tuesday — eight minutes from a Riverside event in which she is shown talking to an audience.

Republican primary rival Steve Poizner's campaign called it another attempt by Whitman to buy the election, referring to the $49 million that she's spent so far on the campaign — largely on paid media advertising.

... Sterling Clifford, campaign spokesman for Democratic candidate Jerry Brown, called Whitman's move "campaign propaganda," while Sean Clegg, campaign manager for the Level the Playing Field 2010, said the move was straight out of Wall Street.

... Whitman's campaign did not know how many stations made use of the footage, but KPIX-TV Channel 5 was one station that refused to run it. Dan Rosenheim, vice president for news at the San Francisco station, said taking video feeds directly from campaigns raises ethical considerations.

Read more: http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-news/ci_14884042
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. I hope people understand why Brown isn't spending money now.
There's no need. He has no primary race. He needs those tens of millions for the general election. This Whitman character will get clobbered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomm2thumbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. hang onto your powder and keep it dry

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. "...said taking video feeds directly from campaigns raises ethical considerations."
Damn librul media. RatBastids.

Spend all your money Meg. Every penny, please. The only parasites more adept than you are the ones "advising" your ignorant ass - to give them more $$$.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chollybocker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. She's been doing this for a long time.
She's the diva in an opera of her own making. (A tragedy, I hope.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. Whitman is Ahnuld without the steroids. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoapBox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. I can't stand this woman...
I am SO sick of the NEGATIVE ads that she has been running.

Over and over and over, on almost all stations here in Los Angeles.

And what has she spent so far? Something like 50 million?

I would not trust her (or Poizner) to go to the corner market.

Speaking of Poizner, I hope that the Latino community jumps on
both of these creeps. He has nothing to say except RANTING about
the "illegals". Well, we know that's just code...

Jerry needs to save his money...he's gonna need it to fight back
against this vile woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Usrename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. wtf?
"Dan Rosenheim, vice president for news at the San Francisco station, said taking video feeds directly from campaigns raises ethical considerations."

That's all Bush did for his whole career. Doesn't anyone remember him being barracaded in his mansion in Texas with the media camped out across the street? And how his campaign would send out runners with pre-recorded videos that they presented to the media? And then how the media would play those tapes?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 05:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC