Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bank bill in peril, WH urges part be dropped

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
The Northerner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 06:51 PM
Original message
Bank bill in peril, WH urges part be dropped
Source: Associated Press

WASHINGTON — In the face of stiff GOP opposition, Obama administration officials want Senate Democrats to purge a $50 billion fund for dismantling "too big to fail" banks from legislation that aims to protect against a new financial crisis. Republicans contend the provision would simply continue government bailouts of Wall Street.

The sweeping bill aims to prevent a recurrence of the crisis that nearly caused a Wall Street meltdown in 2008. Beside creating a mechanism for liquidating large firms, House and Senate bills would govern previously unregulated derivatives, create a council to detect systemwide financial threats and establish a consumer protection agency to police lending, credit cards and other bank-customer transactions.

President Barack Obama declared on Friday that he would veto the bill if it doesn't regulate the freewheeling derivatives market. "We can't afford another AIG," the president said, referring to the giant insurance conglomerate that relied heavily on the complex, sometimes exotic investment instruments.

Separately on Friday, the government accused Goldman Sachs & Co., Wall Street's most powerful firm, of defrauding investors by failing to disclose conflicts of interest in mortgage investments it sold as the housing market was collapsing two years ago.

One senior Treasury official said on Friday that the fund for dismantling giant failing banks, which would be financed by large financial institutions themselves, is unnecessary. He said the costs of dismantling the firms could be recouped from the industry after a liquidation.

If the chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., complies, that would remove one component of the bill that Republicans have persistently used to rally opposition. But it was unclear whether that step alone would yield any Republican votes.

Read more: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5i4uCqEf5jQUUFh6gvxGr2V4dEAlgD9F4ETRG2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Simply a talking point.
Edited on Fri Apr-16-10 06:58 PM by Tandalayo_Scheisskop
It is well-known that before he got all rabid on this bill, Mitch McConnell was meeting with Wall Street not-so-worthies, en masse, and presumably blowing them until they bled.

The fund opposition is a ruse. Wall Street wants no new regulations, or any regulations, on hedge funds. It is where they make their best mischief. "$50 Billion" is simply a point trumpeted so the opposition to the bill resonates with the cognitively depraved amongst us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. The Liquidation Fund Is A BS Excuse By The Republicans, Take It Off The Table To Expose Them...
What the Republicans really want to do is keep derivatives unregulated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BulletproofLandshark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. Don't take out a goddamned thing!
The health care process should have made it clear that there's no point in trying to compromise with these jackals. They'll never vote for bank reform, no matter how watered down it becomes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. "It was unclear whether that step alone would yield any Republican votes"
Umm we just went through this on healthcare. No matter what the Democrats do, it will never be watered down enough for a single GOP vote. Force them to do a real filibuster and then when they give up, pass the freaking thing and get on to the next topic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamthebandfanman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-17-10 05:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. yep
Edited on Sat Apr-17-10 05:16 AM by iamthebandfanman
and noones noticing that the administration is trying to be bi-partison.... trust me..

people in the middle(or not fond of politics) who it mite sway arent really paying much attention to things right now if you ask me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. "costs of dismantling the firms could be recouped from the industry after a liquidation."
Edited on Fri Apr-16-10 10:35 PM by depakid
Except that the administration is on record opposing measures such as a financial transactions and a Tobin tax that are designed to do just that....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-17-10 05:31 AM
Response to Original message
7. Why stop there?
Just give them a key and an I.D. card to Fort Knox along with a fleet of dump trucks to haul the money away with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-17-10 05:49 AM
Response to Original message
8. That's ridiculous. If there isn't a program funded by the banksters
in case of their own demise, we'll be on the hook again. The Republicans are going to accomplish exactly what they claim to be fighting. Someone explain the FDIC to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-18-10 03:20 AM
Response to Original message
9. Glad lobbyists and Rahm had nothing to do with this, only Republicans.
Edited on Sun Apr-18-10 03:22 AM by No Elephants


Anyone see the show about so-called "health care reform" on PBS? If not, check the listings for "Obama's Deal."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC