Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Court Upholds OSHA’s Power to Protect Workers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 06:49 PM
Original message
Court Upholds OSHA’s Power to Protect Workers
Source: AFL-CIO News Blog

by James Parks,

In a major win for workers’ safety on the job, a federal appeals court upheld the power of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to determine how to craft and enforce workplace safety rules.

The saga began when Eric Ho, a contractor in Houston, hired 11 immigrant workers in 2003 to remove asbestos from a building but did not train them or provide them with respirators. After a city inspector issued a stop-work order because of asbestos violations, Ho directed employees to work at night behind locked gates.

OSHA cited Ho for 22 separate violations—11 for not training each worker and 11 for not providing a respirator for each worker. Amazingly, the Bush administration’s Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission overturned the majority of the citations, saying Ho could only be cited once for not training workers and once for not providing respirators. That meant Ho only had to pay two fines, not 22.

OSHA officials rewrote the rules to make it clear that each worker must be given protective equipment and training, and an employer can be cited for each worker not given this protection as a separate violation. But the National Association of Home Builders sued, claiming OSHA didn’t have the authority to say that employers could be cited for each worker left unprotected.

Read more: http://blog.aflcio.org/2010/04/19/court-upholds-oshas-power-to-protect-workers/



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Highly dislike these people who abuse workers like this
GOOD... now make this asshole pay all his fines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. and their cancer care too
They all need to get physicals at "Ho's" expense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Oh absolutely
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BunkerHill24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. great news.....I hope OSHA gets what it needs to enforce this mandate..n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. "Amazingly, the Bush administration ... overturned the majority of the citations"
Edited on Mon Apr-19-10 07:38 PM by PSPS
OSHA cited Ho for 22 separate violations—11 for not training each worker and 11 for not providing a respirator for each worker. Amazingly, the Bush administration’s Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission overturned the majority of the citations, saying Ho could only be cited once for not training workers and once for not providing respirators. That meant Ho only had to pay two fines, not 22.

Amazingly? A more accurate word would be "predictably." I'll bet Ho is big in the GOP bribing "campaign contribution" department too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. I imagine Fat Tony and Slappy and Alito and Roberts will have something to say about this. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mahatmakanejeeves Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-20-10 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
8. Chao v. Ho Ho Ho Express
Edited on Tue Apr-20-10 07:58 AM by mahatmakanejeeves
One of the greatest court case names of all time. I read about it last year. Here is a link.

Ho Ho Ho Express Briefon petition for review of an order of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission

The guy's conduct was totally egregious. See for yourselves.

Statement of Facts

Statement of facts

The hospital renovation and removal of asbestos fireproofing

Ho is a naturalized citizen who, at the time relevant here, resided in Houston, Texas. (R 8:49, p. 1). In December 1997, Ho used funds provided by Fruitland, a fruit and vegetable wholesale company he and his family owned, to buy the abandoned Alief General Hospital and Professional Building in Houston for investment purposes. (R-1; Tr. 40, 53). An Environmental Site Assessment prepared in 1994 by the prior owner indicated that the fireproofing covering structural beams and columns throughout the hospital contained 10% asbestos. (C-17; Tr. 34-36). The broker gave Ho a copy of the report and recommended a further assessment of the severity of the asbestos problem. (Tr. 37). Ho later signed a Commercial Property Condition Statement acknowledging that the buildings contained "asbestos components." (C-19; Tr. 42-43).

In mid-January 1998, apparently without performing any further assessment, Ho hired up to eleven undocumented Mexican nationals to remove asbestos- containing fireproofing and other materials from the buildings. (Tr. 167-170, 178, 259-263, 350-351). Although two supervisors were on site to direct the work, and Ho himself was present to inspect and monitor the progress of the job, no one warned the workers of the presence of asbestos, trained any of them on the hazards associated with asbestos, or provided any of them with appropriate safety equipment such as respirators and protective clothing. (Tr. 125-126, 131, 171-174, 176, 262-263, 274). Ho paid the workers with funds from Ho Express, a Ho family owned trucking company. The workers stood on ladders or on the floor, and used putty knives to scrape the fireproof coating off pipes, beams, columns and decking. (Tr. 58, 60, 73, 120-121,168-170, 197-200, 342-343; C- 28, pp. 4-10). The scraping process produced a dry, fluffy powder that fell onto the workers' heads and faces, and covered their clothes. (Tr. 60-61, 170, 174-175, 198-201). When the powder settled onto the floor, the men swept it into plastic trash bags. (Tr. 124).

The fireproofing powder caked on the men's faces, making it difficult for them to breathe, and turned the street clothing in which they worked white. (Tr. 174-175, 200, 284-285). Some of the workers tried using ordinary paper masks, suitable for nuisance dusts, to keep them from breathing the powder but discarded them as ineffective. (Tr. 60, 120, 174- 175; C-2). There was no running water or clean room available, so the men wore their contaminated clothing home at night. (Tr. 134, 177-178).

On February 2, city building inspector Tim Steward came to the site to investigate a complaint that work was being performed without a permit. (Tr. 56-57). Stewart saw ten workers scraping fireproofing from beams and columns. (Tr. 71, 73-74). He observed as the asbestos-laden powder fell onto the hair and shoulders of the workers and drifted throughout the open building. (Tr. 60, 74, 76-77). After ascertaining that the project lacked a permit, Stewart issued a stop-work order and placed a red tag on the hospital's main entrance. (Tr. 62-63, 267, C-22). The order stated that the work could not continue until the proper permits, plans and approvals were posted. (Ibid.)

In response to the stop-work order, Ho contacted Alamo Environmental, an asbestos abatement firm, for an estimate to remove the remaining fireproofing. After walking through the building with Ho, Alamo's manager Don Weist prepared an estimate of $159,876 for removal of asbestos-containing fireproofing "in strict accordance with EPA, OSHA guidelines." (C-23).

Ho did not accept the Alamo bid; instead he decided to defy the stop-work order and resume his illegal asbestos abatement activities at night. (Tr. 122-123, 268, 271-272). One week after the city inspection, the workers began working twelve-hour shifts beginning at 6 pm, seven days a week, scraping asbestos fireproofing from the hospital's beams and pipes in the same manner they had prior to the stop work order. (Tr. 123-129, 285-286). Ho regularly visited the site to check on the progress of the work and to ensure that the fireproofing was thoroughly scraped. (Tr. 125,-126, 173-174, 273-274).

Ho directed that the gate to the property be kept locked while the men were working at night; only Ho and two supervisors had keys. (Tr. 138, 285-286). There was nothing to drink unless the workers brought something with them, or gave money to a supervisor to buy water or soft drinks. (Tr. 183, 185, 192, 321). The one portable toilet at the site was never serviced and consequently became unusable. (Tr. 183, 299). The men relieved themselves on the property or used the bathroom of a filling station or restaurant some 300 feet away. (Tr. 183, 321-322, 331). Working in this manner, the men finished scraping the asbestos-containing fireproofing on March 10. (Tr. 293).

The natural gas explosion

On March 11, Ho decided to wash down the interior of the hospital building. (Tr. 293). Ho believed that the sprinkler system was still connected to a water source and could be used for washing. (Ibid.). Ho and Corston Tate, a Ho employee, walked around the building and found two pipes that they thought might be water lines. (Ibid.). Ho directed Tate to open one of the pipes to see if it contained water, and then left the site. (Tr. 294). When Tate tried to loosen some bolts on the pipe, it cracked open and pressurized natural gas began to escape. (Tr. 299). Tate and two other workers tried to plug the pipe, but Tate's van was in the way. (Tr. 295-296). When Tate attempted to start the van to move it, the gas exploded, severely injuring the three men and blowing a hole in the exterior wall of the hospital.


And then this idiot comes along:

Abolish EPA, OSHA and IRS, GOP US House District 5 candidate says
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC