Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Annan: Nations Want U.N. Umbrella in Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-03 08:52 PM
Original message
Annan: Nations Want U.N. Umbrella in Iraq
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/un_iraq&cid=519&ncid=1480

UNITED NATIONS - Many nations want a U.N. umbrella on the U.S.-led operation in Iraq (news - web sites) before they commit troops, and Secretary-General Kofi Annan (news - web sites) said Wednesday that he would support a new U.N. resolution to help pull the necessary nations together.

Four months after the bitterly divided U.N. Security Council refused to back the war in Iraq, the U.S.-led occupation is facing guerrilla-style opposition and continuing problems in restoring security and basic services. Increasingly, the United States is looking to the United Nations (news - web sites), a body some U.S. officials had dismissed as irrelevant.

Annan told a news conference that the message coming from U.N. member states is that "the imprimatur of the United Nations — the legitimacy the United Nations offers — is important."

The new focus on the United Nations appears to have started earlier this month after France, Germany and India refused a U.S. request to provide troops for the U.S.-led force in Iraq unless there is a U.N. mandate.

more

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mechatanketra Donating Member (903 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-03 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh, right, this is logical.
A child asks Mom for a candy bar. Mom says "No", so the child steals it, and gets caught by the shopkeeper. Should Mom pay the shopkeeper for the candy bar? If she does, rest assured, there will be more attempted thefts in the future.

Fact is, the UN is irrelevant. Faced with the baldest threat possible to their stated purpose of "ending the scourge of war" -- a powerful nation bent on starting a war of conquest regardless of international opinion, the same situation that initially created the UN -- they fell into a state of paralysis. The fact that they didn't participate in the invasion doesn't clear them of moral culpability -- their purpose was to get involved, on the other side. Anything else is simply Kitty Genovese on an international scale.

If America didn't deserve the UN's "legitimacy" before invading, they sure the hell don't deserve it now. By the standards of the UN charter, the question facing the UN should be not how to deal with the threat posed by Iraq, but by America.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 06:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC