Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Republican Senators Call for Special Prosecutor in Sestak Case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 10:51 AM
Original message
Republican Senators Call for Special Prosecutor in Sestak Case
Source: The AtlanticWire

Wednesday, all seven Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee called for a special prosecutor to be appointed to investigate an alleged White House attempt to influence a Senate Democratic primary race. Representative Joe Sestak, who won the primary, has claimed that the White House offered him a job in exchange for dropping out of the race, in which he was competing with Arlen Specter. The Republican senators, as well as others who have been gunning for a prosecution, say that, if true, the administration may have broken the law.

Read more: http://www.theatlanticwire.com/opinions/view/opinion/Republican-Senators-Call-for-Special-Prosecutor-in-Sestak-Case-3771
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm sure this will come up at the press conference. Where were these assholes while Bush was truly
destroying the constitution and breaking the law?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. There is on record that the Bush administration
had five instances where they asked people not to run for a specific office so someone else could have it. I think that someone should print out all those instances involving the Bush administration and rove the turd blossom and email or send them to this republican. Ask him should they start with Bush and Rove and then work down to Sestak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. And when Bush broke the law over and over and over and over again, BOTH parties sat there
for the most part. Oh, there were some theatrics and "hearings," but nothing of consequence.

I am curious to see if their actually able to push through this garbage. It's the same kind of trumped up BS they used to drag Clinton through the mud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. Offering a job to someone in exchange for dropping out of a electoral race could NEVER be illegal
Edited on Thu May-27-10 03:23 PM by rocktivity
because there's no way to know or guarantee what the outcome of the race will be. In other words, the senatorial seat was neither Obama's, Spector's or Sestak's to sell, so no deal was struck.

:headbang:
rocktivity

P.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. I'm not really questioning whether it's legal or not, although I agree with you.
And if it is illegal, then every pol in the Beltway is guilty.

In any case, it's another stupid witch hunt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharp_stick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. Damn wasn't it just about two years ago
that Republicans thought that Special Prosecutors should never be used?

Fuck em' laugh at the impotent rage and play all the tapes of them claiming that torture memos don't warrant a special prosecutor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. "They" are making this stuff up in order to hurt Obama re Sestak Bribe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harkadog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. Who is the "they" Sestak?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
5. Sestak could have answered this right up front, what's going on?....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I agree.
This kerfuffle is thanks to Sestak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
7. LOL, good luck assholes, and the Dems would be smart to remind these creeps
the ammunition that can be used on their corrupt legacy too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. That is the problem: The GOP knows there will be no payback
because the Dems will be "keeping their powder dry."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Oh I don't think so, they may never go after Bush/Cheney for war crimes
but, I don't think they'll be so foolish as to do nothing.

The Republican legacy is ripe with corruption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denverbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
8. OK, as long as they investigate all of Bush's appointments and firings too. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonathan_seer Donating Member (80 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
10. Such an offer IS NOT against the law or improper - it's politics 101 - Patronage
The Republithug goal is to say that it might be enough times in order to sow enough doubt in Penn. voters to promote the notion that Pres. did act. illegally.

The whole thing is absurd. A president offers a member of his party a "political/administrative" job to get him out of a race with an incumbent he supports???

Patronage is as old as democracy itself, and has always been a favorite tool of all politicians in power to get other politicians to cooperate with their overall plan/agenda.

That is politics 101. It's very normal. It's classic political haggling.

Even if pressure is involved it's still VERY normal.

Of course the Repulithugs and their TeaTard supporters want to make it seem like it was some sort of physical threat which would might make it so, but only Joe would be able to say yes or no, and he's said no.

Every politician whose ever supported anyone and sat or sits in a position of authority has done this sort of bargaining.

The White House needs to step out in front and say unequivocally that this sort of "political bargaining" is the NORM, and is part of the political process.

People who think otherwise are naive, and need to get a basic education on the political process and civics.

There is no wrong elements about a president doing this.

It's the stuff of every political discussions everywhere by each party as leaders try to shape the best overall team to gain or keep the majority in an upcoming election.

The Republicans do something similar when each time they try to talk a TeaTard candidate out of running - in return for dropping out some sort of politically related quid pro quo is offered as an incitement.

The fact that the president's team participates does NOT make it suddenly illegal or improper.

As leader of his party the President is going to be the #1 go to guy to get recalcitrant party members to bend to the will of the national party, succeed or fail.Bush/Cheney certainly had no qualms about doing the same thing, and it wasn't illegal then and it is not now.

The attempt to get someone to do something has to go pretty far into physical coercion or blackmail before the legality becomes questionable.

Their attempts to make it a sort of an "attempted bribery" are idiotic and meaningless.

First off bribery is most often used to circumvent a law, or do something inherently illegal.

Neither of these are applicable here.

If they were then the whole political process involving bargaining at its most basic would become illegal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr. Sparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
11. They haven't changed one bit since the clinton days.
The Democrats should get a head start on them and start investigationg everything the repugs did since the year 2000 as come November, there are going to be a lot of this worth less investigations about the Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
12. Lying the world into a war,that's all right.
Offering a job,this is an outrage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SILVER__FOX52 Donating Member (460 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
15. In my opinion,
the Republicans are mental.  Look at the state of our Country.
 Multiple problems cause by them and their corruption and this
is their rally point.  The disconnect is STUNNING !!!  If it
were criminal to be an imbecile, most of the Republicans would
be in prison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pundaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
17. See, when you trivialize the crimes of your predecessors, and join in, it just makes one
happy family. Our guy is incompetent in this environment. He gets rolled from all sides, and the People he conned continue to get no service, but lip.

This is what happens when everything is refined into politics, after public service, patriotism, and statesmanship have been factored away. Everything is historic an nothing gets done, while those that know what they want, legal or not, get to take it from a confused and inept government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proudohioan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
18. It's my understanding that it was just a job offer,
and one that Sestak seems to be fully qualified for.

I hadn't heard that Sestak actually stated that it was in return for dropping out of the race. He simply stated that he was offered a job. What the hell is the big deal? And since he didn't drop out of the race, isn't this a moot point? Isn't this a little far-reaching?

Come on now, it wasn't like Sestak has been a busboy his entire life, then offered some high ranking position that he was nowhere near qualified for.

This is simply a ridiculous non-issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
19. They can go fuck themselves
and I hope someone in the administration says it just like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
21. Great! Let's have that prosecutor and waste all this time and money -
- to prove that nothing was improper. Egg on their faces - not ours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC