Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BP exec denies oil plumes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 11:02 AM
Original message
BP exec denies oil plumes
Source: macleans ca

Claim contradicts U.S. government information

Doug Shuttles, British Petroleum’s chief operating officer, went on the Today show Wednesday to deny government claims that massive oil plumes were polluting the ocean a thousand meters below the surface dozens of kilometers around the Gulf spill. But his argument may be mostly semantic—he also said the concentrations of oil were “very low” and that in the end the situation “may be down to how you define what a plume is.” The statement comes one day after the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration announced that University of South Florida researchers had conducted tests proving that the oil, an estimated 12,000 to 25,000 barrels a day of which is spewing into the Gulf, is polluting far more then the surface of the ocean.

Read more: http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/06/09/bp-exec-denies-oil-plumes/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
1.  ROV's


Was reading a report that a researcher was bemoaning the fact that all available ROVs are being used by the industry and he can't get even one to research where the oil is going.

Imagine what fun it would be if an ROV was used solely to track the oily plumes?

I know the Navy, or so I have been told, can't do underwater like BP can, but wouldn't it be fun if Obama were to kindly beg the Navy subs to do some recon and let us know what's what with the plumes?

Or maybe he did, and the Navy does, but they don't want us to know? No?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happygoluckytoyou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. feather: a feather, especially a large or ornamental one..... i gotta agree with the BP guy....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. Ironic that the CEO could possibly be fired by the Board of Directors if he told the truth.
Conflict of interest, y'know????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. Marlboro exec denies cigarettes cause cancer. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasquuatch55 Donating Member (701 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Thought they could hide it With all those dispersant's, which only adds to the disaster!
MOTHERFUCKERS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daggahead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. Toxic Sludge is Good For You! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
5. Subpoena him and force him to testify under oath:
then his lies will be actionable offenses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
7. Of course the executive does. That executive is being paid well to lie.
Edited on Wed Jun-09-10 11:25 AM by w4rma
And that is really the entirety of that executive's job, most likely. Money will buy liars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4lbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
8. And people wonder why Obama hasn't talked directly to CEO Hayward. The COO is already doing his
own impression of Baghdad Bob. Imagine what Hayward would say.

"Who you gonna believe? Me, or those scientists, engineers, and those underwater ROV cameras?"

"There are no additional oil plumes here."

"In fact, there never was an oil spill. It's all an optical illusion caused by the refraction of Gulf water."

"I blame Mexico's illegal immigrants."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Got it wrong
The real answer at the bottom is

"I blame the Liberal environmentalist" - just ask Sarah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
9. He now says they're not "plumes," they're "clouds."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. "Lovely Blossoms"
of oil... :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
10. it depends on "how you define what a plume is.” Bring him up to Congress to explain his definition
and let's compare it to NOAA's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
12. BP is pathetic, just like many other huge corporations. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daggahead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. They're not pathetic, they're sociopathic.
Edited on Fri Jun-11-10 08:23 AM by daggahead
sociopath ( soh -see-uh-path, soh -shee-uh-path)

Someone whose social behavior is extremely abnormal. Sociopaths are interested only in their personal needs and desires, without concern for the effects of their behavior on others.

Or perhaps they are psychopathic:

psychopath (sī'kə-pāth')
n.
A person with an antisocial personality disorder, especially one manifested in perverted, criminal, or amoral behavior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Militant_Populist Donating Member (33 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
13. Guess they'll deny gravity next. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 06:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC