Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Says Spill a Call to Action to Cut ‘Addiction’ to Oil

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 07:55 PM
Original message
Obama Says Spill a Call to Action to Cut ‘Addiction’ to Oil
Edited on Tue Jun-15-10 08:12 PM by Turborama
Source: Bloomberg

President Barack Obama said the unprecedented oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico should be an urgent call to action on legislation that will cut the nation’s dependence on fossil fuels.

“For decades, we have talked and talked about the need to end America’s century-long addiction to fossil fuels,” Obama said in the text of a speech tonight, his first national address delivered from the Oval Office. “And for decades, we have failed to act with the sense of urgency that this challenge requires.”

Obama also said he will tell BP Plc Chairman Carl-Henric Svanberg in a meeting tomorrow that the company must set aside “whatever resources are required to compensate the workers and business owners who have been harmed as a result of his company’s recklessness.”

The fund must be administered by an independent third party, he said.

Read more: http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-06-15/obama-says-spill-a-call-to-action-to-cut-addiction-to-oil.html



"One of the lessons we've learned from this spill is that we need better regulations better safety standards, and better enforcement when it comes to offshore drilling. But a larger lesson is that no matter how much we improve our regulation of the industry, drilling for oil these days entails greater risk. After all, oil is a finite resource. We consume more than 20% of the world's oil, but have less than 2% of the world's oil reserves. And that's part of the reason oil companies are drilling a mile beneath the surface of the ocean because we're running out of places to drill on land and in shallow water.

For decades, we have known the days of cheap and easily accessible oil were numbered. For decades, we have talked and talked about the need to end America's century-long addiction to fossil fuels. And for decades, we have failed to act with the sense of urgency that this challenge requires. Time and again, the path forward has been blocked not only by oil industry lobbyists, but also by a lack of political courage and candor.

The consequences of our inaction are now in plain sight. Countries like China are investing in clean energy jobs and industries that should be here in America. Each day, we send nearly $1 billion of our wealth to foreign countries for their oil. And today, as we look to the Gulf, we see an entire way of life being threatened by a menacing cloud of black crude.

We cannot consign our children to this future. The tragedy unfolding on our coast is the most painful and powerful reminder yet that the time to embrace a clean energy future is now. Now is the moment for this generation to embark on a national mission to unleash American innovation and seize control of our own destiny.

This is not some distant vision for America. The transition away from fossil fuels will take some time, but over the last year and a half, we have already taken unprecedented action to jumpstart the clean energy industry.
As we speak, old factories are reopening to produce wind turbines, people are going back to work installing energy-efficient windows, and small businesses are making solar panels. Consumers are buying more efficient cars and trucks, and families are making their homes more energy-efficient. Scientists and researchers are discovering clean energy technologies that will someday lead to entire new industries.

Each of us has a part to play in a new future that will benefit all of us. As we recover from this recession, the transition to clean energy has the potential to grow our economy and create millions of good, middle-class jobs but only if we accelerate that transition. Only if we seize the moment. And only if we rally together and act as one nation workers and entrepreneurs; scientists and citizens; the public and private sectors.

When I was a candidate for this office, I laid out a set of principles that would move our country towards energy independence. Last year, the House of Representatives acted on these principles by passing a strong and comprehensive energy and climate bill a bill that finally makes clean energy the profitable kind of energy for America's businesses.

Now, there are costs associated with this transition. And some believe we can't afford those costs right now. I say we can't afford not to change how we produce and use energy because the long-term costs to our economy, our national security, and our environment are far greater.

So I am happy to look at other ideas and approaches from either party as long they seriously tackle our addiction to fossil fuels. Some have suggested raising efficiency standards in our buildings like we did in our cars and trucks. Some believe we should set standards to ensure that more of our electricity comes from wind and solar power. Others wonder why the energy industry only spends a fraction of what the high-tech industry does on research and development and want to rapidly boost our investments in such research and development.

All of these approaches have merit, and deserve a fear hearing in the months ahead. But the one approach I will not accept is inaction. The one answer I will not settle for is the idea that this challenge is too big and too difficult to meet. You see, the same thing was said about our ability to produce enough planes and tanks in World War II. The same thing was said about our ability to harness the science and technology to land a man safely on the surface of the moon. And yet, time and again, we have refused to settle for the paltry limits of conventional wisdom. Instead, what has defined us as a nation since our founding is our capacity to shape our destiny our determination to fight for the America we want for our children. Even if we're unsure exactly what that looks like. Even if we don't yet know precisely how to get there. We know we'll get there.

It is a faith in the future that sustains us as a people. It is that same faith that sustains our neighbors in the Gulf right now."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. I sure hope so. But we'll have to fight the GOP that just love their oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well, if you read the "Official" speech thread, you'd never know
he said that. They didn't hear it. I guess they missed it while posting. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Really?
Which forum is that thread in, GD or GDP?

I've been watching the coverage on CNN and there's been no discussion there on that part of the speech, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Apparently Obama did nothing but say we have to pray, according to some folks.
I am seeing a lot of word-twisting, but what the hell, that's DU for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #14
22. I've seen a thread full of that nonsense just now
In fact GD is currently full of threads saying similar things.

There seems to be some more rational reactions to the speech in GDP so I'm hanging out there instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. I am old enough to remember the Arab Oil embargo (against the USA)
Edited on Tue Jun-15-10 08:13 PM by sharesunited
followed a few years later by what was supposed to be a seminal Jimmy Carter energy awareness speech.

That was over 30 years ago.

We have been making very slow progress since then.

A new energy policy is the silver lining on this miserable spill event.

Never again. The poisoning is just disgusting.

That sense of toxicity and pollution seems to recommend against nuclear too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bc3000 Donating Member (766 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. n/t
Edited on Tue Jun-15-10 08:24 PM by bc3000
replied to wrong post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 06:13 AM
Response to Reply #3
26. We've had Reagan or Reaganesque administrations since Carter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'd really like to hear the reason someone thought it necessary to unrec this news n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bc3000 Donating Member (766 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. not me, but maybe because it's a "nothing" story?

He didn't say anything that hasn't already been said a thousand times by other politicians.

Now that Jimmy Carter speech you mention, that's something else. I've gone back and read that several times and it's excellent. These throwaway words from Obama don't even deserve to be mentioned in the same thread as that speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I didn't mention a Carter speech
Edited on Tue Jun-15-10 08:53 PM by Turborama
This was a key issue on Obama's platform during the election and was the main reason I supported him. It remains to be seen whether they are actually "throwaway words", making a judgement like that immediately after he said them has no merit whatsoever.

How about refuting what he actually said instead of using that commonly used straw man opposition?

ETA It's actually really ironic that the comment you use to ridicule his speech is pretty much what he's referring to and denouncing:

For decades, we have talked and talked about the need to end America's century-long addiction to fossil fuels. And for decades, we have failed to act with the sense of urgency that this challenge requires.

"He didn't say anything that hasn't already been said a thousand times by other politicians."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bc3000 Donating Member (766 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. Remains to be seen? How long do we have to wait?
He said the obvious and offered no plan to change anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Longer than one hour after he finished the speech.
Edited on Tue Jun-15-10 10:23 PM by Turborama
"He said the obvious and offered no plan to change anything."

It might be obvious to you, me and most DUers, but not to the uninformed public this speech was aimed at. He had 18 minutes, enough time to introduce the direction he's going to those who might have missed that part of his election campaign but not enough time to go into greater detail, unfortunately.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihavenobias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. If only Carter had stayed instead of the 'Reagan Revolution'. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Carter and Gore
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Titanothere Donating Member (198 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
32. We'd still be standing in gas lines
Carter was thrown out on his butt for a reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
10. So Tax it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
12. BUT add this to the mix. We are cutting education funds and firing
teachers, how in the hell can we educate our children to try to find alternative forms of energy when they can't get a decent education. Instead of cutting education funds they should be increased. I know people won't like this, but I think one of the reasons kids don't learn in school is disruption. I think kids that don't want to learn upset the class and the teachers are too busy trying to control them and can't teach. I am not saying this is in all the classes but I bet a damn dollar it is in a lot of them. why don't they send those kids out of class and let them all be in a class by themselves. Kids that want to learn can then learn.I know this for a fact in some schools. Some places where you think kids are from so called good homes. But they are just as bad as what you would think the inner city gangs would do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DissedByBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
13. I knew this would happen as soon as I heard of the spill
I had no doubt Obama was going to use it as a centerpiece to push his energy plan.

"For decades, we have known the days of cheap and easily accessible oil were numbered."

Define "easily accessible." Do you mean physically easily accessible, or easily accessible without the legal blockade against exploring and extracting?

"Now, there are costs associated with this transition. And some believe we can't afford those costs right now."

I know I can't afford them. But I have the feeling I'm going to be paying up soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frisbee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
15. Actually...
it's about the 50th "call to action" to cut our addiction to oil, and I suspect it will be about as successful as the previous 49. Once this disaster is no longer the lead story we'll quickly go right back to where we were before it happened. And republicans will be back shilling for big oil. This is only a blip on the radar, in the longer term, little will change any time soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bc3000 Donating Member (766 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Exactly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yeahyeah Donating Member (741 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
16. Did he say anything about maybe we should plug the leak?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
av8rdave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. Perhaps he didn't feel the need to waste time stating the obvious?
He also didn't say anything about not murdering your neighbor or farting in church.

As far as I know, so far only Rush Limbaugh has said anything against stopping the leak (oil being as natural as the seawater or something to that effect).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #16
28. He said something about that "being beyond the capacity of human technology"
Edited on Wed Jun-16-10 03:47 PM by eowyn_of_rohan
It was the kiss your butt goodbye speech
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yeahyeah Donating Member (741 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #28
31.  "beyond the capacity of human technology"?!
I would say "uh-oh" but that might be slightly understated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. I looked it up - These were his actual words:
"Because there has never been a leak this size at this depth, stopping it has tested the limits of human technology"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yeahyeah Donating Member (741 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. That's better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-10 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
19. our "addiction to oil" could be cut DRAMATICALLY
if the f'ing occupations were ended. I don't have the figures, but the MIC is the biggest user by far as I recall.....

Added benefit: we could throw TRILLIONS of dollar towards this disaster with the money we save from "wars".

Can't we declare our Gulf, our water, our air: TOO BIG TO FAIL????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. Great point! We should.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Child_Of_Isis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #19
29. That is such a good point.
But to hear the rhetoric, you would think that the average human being does nothing but drive around in their suv's all day. My god, we drive to work & pick up food for the children on our way home from work just to save a buck or two on gas.

Okay, we do have the soccer moms out there....I guess they are the culprits that are causing the oil execs to make really shitty decisions that wipe out entire coastlines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam kane Donating Member (326 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #19
34. Addiction to *lobbyists*
Diesel cars were made to run on vegetable oil, solar electric technology has been around forever, but they have been literally buried because politicians have been willing to take big oil's money, including Obama.

Tired of these deeply ironic lectures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhiannon12866 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 02:47 AM
Response to Original message
24. K&R. Good speech...
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 05:35 AM
Response to Original message
25. Addicted to oil. Where have I heard that before?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Child_Of_Isis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
27. Nothing about corporations addiction to profit ...
Corporations think they are above the law. They have no regard for human life, or the environment. I don't see how the peons getting off oil is going to solve this problem at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Titanothere Donating Member (198 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
30. Didn't this argument use to be "Addiction to Foreign Oil"?
When did that change?

Has anyone here actually cured their "addiction"? And if so, have you actually done it economically, without the government paying you to do so with subsidies? I'm all for effeciencies, I just got a $1500 tax rebate on my new AC so that's great, but this idea that oil is inherently evil is bogus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC