Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jindal vetoes bill to open oil spill records

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-10 09:25 PM
Original message
Jindal vetoes bill to open oil spill records
Source: AP

Jindal vetoes bill to open oil spill records
By MELINDA DESLATTE
Associated Press Writer


BATON ROUGE, La. -- Gov. Bobby Jindal rejected a bill Friday that would have required him to make public and to preserve all his office's documents involving the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.

In his veto letter, the governor said the legislation would have hurt the state's position in future litigation against BP PLC, the oil giant that leased the rig which exploded April 20 in the Gulf of Mexico, killing 11 workers and causing the disaster.

"This bill would allow BP and other parties with potential liability to the state to obtain information retained by any state agency responding to this tragic event," Jindal wrote, saying such access could jeopardize the state's position in seeking legal remedy for the spill's damage.

The Senate sponsor of the public records provision said Friday night that Jindal's veto was expected. He noted that the governor has repeatedly fought attempts to require preservation and open most of his office's records to public scrutiny.

-snip-

Read more: http://www.miamiherald.com/2010/06/25/1701472/jindal-vetoes-bill-to-open-oil.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-10 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. SOB.....I can hear the Shredders from MY HOUSE
Where is the Clarity, the Truth, the Honesty??

His excuses are LAME...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 06:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. He's a little fucking weasel
A BP house boy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Xactly...a weasel of the worst kind....
The Alfred Newman look alike is gonna be toast if he has Oval aspirations
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-10 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'd like to know what this is about. The records would be preserved.
Is he helping or hurting?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-10 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. He's afraid we'll see that he could have had the Guard there any time he
wanted, but he chose to complain that Obama wasn't providing them. Plus other things, I'm sure.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-10 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. Protect those oil companies--aren't they wonderful?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-10 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. Jindals rationale is rather Orwellian
To insure protection of the records would hinder the state's position in further litigation

That doesn't make a lick of sense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
metapunditedgy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-10 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Powerful people tend to confuse themselves with the thing they're responsible for.
Madoff thought he was managing his own money. Jindal thinks that his own interests are the state's interests. Etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. doublespeak - what a spin meister
Edited on Sat Jun-26-10 12:45 PM by eowyn_of_rohan
we have to burn the village to save it

Criminal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
O is 44 Donating Member (740 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-10 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'm sure Andy Cooper will get right on this story.....
yeah right, he's too busy propping up the good governor and the rest of the Louisiana politicians. They blanket his show every night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PJPhreak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-10 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. As I said in another thread...
Booby Jindal is a
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old Vet Donating Member (618 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-10 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Bullshit......................
On so many levels. Ive said it once and stand by my last position, Hes covered in oil and his intrests are exactly that. Even if there made public its asserted it could be at BPs advantage HUhhhhhhhhhh????? Maybe someone could explain that logic, I cant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
verdalaven Donating Member (495 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
12. A question to those who understand the law better than I do-
If LA filed a lawsuit, couldn't BP request/subpoena whatever records it wanted in defense of the lawsuit? And if they can, then what is the point to Jindal protecting those records? (Unless he is just preventing LA voters from knowing he is somehow complicit?)

I ask because I really don't understand how his actions protect LA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
13. typical...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
14. Bullpucky! BP or any other party would have had the info in discovery
on the bright side, maybe they can use all those shreddings to soak up some of the oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
15. That's a phony excuse by Jindal to stonewall disclosure of records
I am always suspicious of politicians when they fight to prevent the public from knowing something the public already has the right to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
17. What's he trying to hide? What communications did he have w/BP that he wants to
stay under wraps? I betcha....I just betcha......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC