Closing Guantánamo Fades as a Priority

Source: NY Times

WASHINGTON — Stymied by political opposition and focused on competing priorities, the Obama administration has sidelined efforts to close the Guantánamo prison, making it unlikely that President Obama will fulfill his promise to close it before his term ends in 2013.

When the White House acknowledged last year that it would miss Mr. Obama’s initial January 2010 deadline for shutting the prison, it also declared that the detainees would eventually be moved to one in Illinois. But impediments to that plan have mounted in Congress, and the administration is doing little to overcome them.

“There is a lot of inertia” against closing the prison, “and the administration is not putting a lot of energy behind their position that I can see,” said Senator Carl Levin, the Michigan Democrat who is chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee and supports the Illinois plan. He added that “the odds are that it will still be open” by the next presidential inauguration.

And Senator Lindsey Graham, a South Carolina Republican who also supports shutting it, said the effort is “on life support and it’s unlikely to close any time soon.” He attributed the collapse to some fellow Republicans’ “demagoguery” and the administration’s poor planning and decision-making “paralysis.”

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/26/us/politics/26gitmo.html?hp

All those people would still be prisoners.....someplace.

:-(

some folks thought the terrorists were going to invade us here in northwest Illinois...but the federal government bought it anyway.

I learned that right here on DU :sarcasm:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x8131601

Oil reaches Cuba they will have to close it down.

"from 'he'll show you all!' to 'never mind'"

Thread here:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=433x356129

Back on topic though to this thread, I am sure if Obama could have done it he would have but considering everything on his plate from the mess left by the Bush administration he probably just didnt have the political clout at this time.
That aside it does suck.

It is easy to promise a closure when you are not in charge.

It is quite different to actually do it, and perhaps face the consequences at the polls if a few of the former inmates turn up in the Taliban ranks or worse in a terrorist strike elsewhere. I can quite understand why Obama is less than eager to step on this particular mine, particularly as international complaints about Gitmo have declined since the Bush era.