Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Justices Uphold Sarbanes-Oxley Act

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 02:45 PM
Original message
Justices Uphold Sarbanes-Oxley Act
Source: New York Times

The Supreme Court on Monday unanimously rejected a challenge to the constitutionality of the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley law, which sought to reform corporate America following the Enron and WorldCom accounting scandals.

The court turned aside a broad challenge to one part of the law, which established the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board to regulate the accounting industry. Some commentators had forecast that the court might throw out the entire law because of problems with the way the accounting board is appointed, but the justices refused to do so.

Instead, in a 5-to-4 split, the court found that the way members of the oversight board could be removed was unconstitutional.

As a result of that decision, the Securities and Exchange Commission, which appoints the five members of the board, will now be able to remove members at will, rather than only if there is good cause.

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/29/business/29accounting.html?src=mv
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SemperEadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. good
The law also granted corporate whistle-blowers far-reaching protections and was intended to protect investors by introducing the possibility of long prison terms to anyone found guilty of fraud by “scheme or artifice.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. Another good reason to keep a Dem in the White House.
I know that I've been hard on Obama, but I'm glad he's the one who appointing SEC commissioners now, not McCain. God forbid that Palin even comes within 10,000 miles of appointing an SEC member.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Time to clean out the Bush-Bots.
Remove them at will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. It passed 9-0
I agree with AJ Breyer and the other four justices who dissented on how members could be removed from their position.

Breyer (from the article)
supervision of the accounting board “violates no separation-of-powers principle.” But it does, he said, call into question the constitutional status of many government officials.

“Reading the criteria as stringently as possible,” he wrote, “I still see no way to avoid sweeping hundreds, perhaps thousands of high level government officials within the scope of the court’s holding, putting their job security and their administrative actions and decisions constitutionally at risk.”

At least potentially among them, he said, were the leadership of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the Social Security Administration, administrative law judges and military officers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 06:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC