Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rice Is Agreeable to Return for More of 9/11 Panel's Queries

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
hedgetrimmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 12:29 AM
Original message
Rice Is Agreeable to Return for More of 9/11 Panel's Queries
~SNIP~
By ADAM NAGOURNEY and RICHARD W. STEVENSON

Published: March 26, 2004


WASHINGTON, March 25 — Under mounting pressure from Democrats about its response to the investigation into the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, the White House offered Thursday to have Condoleezza Rice, the national security adviser, answer more questions from the Sept. 11 panel. At the same time, President Bush forcefully denied accusations that he had ignored the severity of the threat from Al Qaeda.

The White House announced late Thursday that Ms. Rice was willing to appear before the panel again, but only in private and not under oath. Some Republicans said that Mr. Bush was being undercut by the perception that a senior White House official would not cooperate, while his aides were out pummeling Richard A. Clarke, the former counterterrorism chief who has accused the Bush administration of not heeding warnings before Sept. 11.

The moves came as the White House also sought to deflect new criticism of Mr. Bush for his handling of counterterrorism issues in the months before the attacks and to contain the fallout of an investigation that Democrats and some Republicans said could cast a shadow over his re-election campaign.

The Senate Democratic leader, Tom Daschle, called on the White House to cease "character attacks" on Mr. Clarke.

... more ...

link: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/26/politics/26PANE.html?hp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grannylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. How much more freaking obvious could it be that she/they have something
to hide??
If there really were ANY 'honor and dignity' restored to the White House (well, in the first place, this den of thieves would not even be there, but anyhow...) they would be doing everything they could to honor the dead, the survivors, the families, and the American people to spill it all, or we really DO face an increased threat of something happening again...we cannot afford to have anything ever be such a clusterfuck as this whole thing ever again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Career Prole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. Under oath or not at all! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. well, if she returns once not under oath and they are still unsatisfied
as she continues to munch on her toes, they can subpoena her and put her under oath later... it's nice to see this as a series of increasingly painful meetings for condi. personally, i wouldn't mind if she had a breakdown of some kind over the pressure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Career Prole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Now there's a happy thought! :-)
Rice doing the Woody Woodpecker laugh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 02:44 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. They don't have subpoena power..................
do they? I thought that was one of the conditions set by the Bush administration to have the hearings at all. I may be wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SodoffBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. but not under oath.
So, what's the point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. "only in private and not under oath" - not good enough
If they have nothing to hide, they shouldn't mind being questioned publicly and under oath - this is what the right wing always says to everyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostInAnomie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
6. Wow what a brave soul
She must have some serious balls to be willing to meet behind closed doors where she wont be sworn in.

I salute you Condi... you are truly one cowardly piece of shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jo35042 Donating Member (139 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
8. How extremely arrogant
Edited on Fri Mar-26-04 12:43 AM by jo35042
and cowardly. A perfect example, if more were needed, of the mindset in our government. They seem to believe that they are so far above the rest of us that any behavior on their part is to be not only accepted, but admired. They are all psychopaths of one sort or another.:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgetrimmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Welcome jo35042 to the dance, expect a little hostility if you are a
anti-war lefty, a new kind of Democrat hitting voting booths this Nov.

What does jo35042 stand for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
11. Locking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 05:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC