Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hearings: BP did not suspend drilling operations after report of leaking blowout preventer

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 11:09 AM
Original message
Hearings: BP did not suspend drilling operations after report of leaking blowout preventer
Source: The Times-Picayune

The Deepwater Horizon's blowout preventer -- the key device for shutting off a wild oil well -- had a leak in the days before it failed to operate and BP did not comply with a federal regulation requiring the rig to suspend operations, a BP company man testified Tuesday.

Well site leader Ronald Sepulvado told a Marine Board investigative panel in Kenner that before he wrapped up his stint as BP's top man on the rig four days before the April 20 accident, he reported that one of the control pods on the blowout preventer, or BOP, had a leak.

He said he told his supervisor in Houston, BP team leader John Guide, and assumed that Guide would notify federal regulators at the Minerals Management Service. According to investigators, that never happened.

Federal Regulation 250.451(d) states that if someone drilling in federal waters encounters "a BOP control station or pod that does not function properly" the rig must "suspend further drilling operations until that station or pod is operable."

Read more: http://www.nola.com/news/gulf-oil-spill/index.ssf/2010/07/hearings_bp_did_not_suspend_dr.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. As more of the truth unfolds --
it will become even more clear that they should be held criminally responsible for the deaths of those 11 workers. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merwin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. And more and more clear that they never will be...
Unfortunately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. Kicked and recommended.
Thanks for the thread, Lone_Star_Dem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. probably wrapped some duct tape around it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. And the hits just keep on coming....but, something tells me the current Administration
will just... you know, "look forward". :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cstanleytech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Well they cant exactly travel back in time
and make it so it never happened and we dont have a suped up DeLorean with an optional Flux Capacitor installed.
All that can be done really is to try to prevent another spill like this one from happening in the end, that and coming down on BP like a ton of bricks and holding their feet to the fire to force them to pay for the entire cleanup as well as a heavy enough fine for the damages that they will never, ever think it worth trying to save a bit of money by not obeying the regulations again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celebration Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. a few people going to jail would also help n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cstanleytech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Aye, as well as
seizing most of the assets from them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panzerfaust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-10 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #8
20. Real soon that will be happening...
Can we please now hear (again) from all the BP "oil exploration is a complex operation, and things will rarely happen that the most safety conscious company cannot prevent" apologists?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. While I've no fucking clue where the Doc Brown bullshit comes in...
:eyes:
I'm thinking a little more along the lines of prosecuting the murderous, polluting bastards. Won't happen, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cstanleytech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 06:03 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. It was in reference to
your whole look forward comment.
My point is we cant change the past and there is little point in always wanting to chew over things like stale vomit, all we or anyone else can do is look to the future and work hard to try and not repeat past mistakes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. " Look forward ", of course, is in reference to the Obama Administration's policy toward MANY
crimes committed in the recent past that they have failed to prosecute; hard to believe any DU'er wouldn't know that. That anyone could infer that I'd made a plea for time-travel in my post is just fucking bizarre, to say the least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cstanleytech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I am well aware of it as I am that many try to turn it into a slur. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Policy critique as "slur" ? Fascinating. Seems more like cover for a failed attempt at snark ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cstanleytech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Lets review shall we.
You posted

" And the hits just keep on coming....but, something tells me the current Administration will just... you know, "look forward". :puke: "


In that context the "look forward". :puke:" does not imo read as a critique but rather to me reads as a slur.
Before ya fly off the handle though keep in mind I am not saying dont critique him (I will probably even agree with you on some things to because he has made some decisions I am not happy with as well) but not in the method you used here if you can please.
After all even a tiny bit of such usage can have long term consequences on a politicians as we saw when such tactics were wielded by the republicans so well against many democrats these past few years ("Dean scream" for example when used by fox news) so lets not shoot ourselves in the foot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-10 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. You have your methods of critique, and I have mine. Again, if you are going to
attempt an unnecessarily snarky post, you might want to make sure your pop-culture references are applicable and relevant. You probably wouldn't have to tap-dance so much to cover them. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cstanleytech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-10 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. If I had been attempting to be snarky your reply would actually be
relevant but since I did not set out with that in mind I shall just ignore it :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oceansaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dtexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. Of course not: they needed that well to dispose of toxic waste.
That bunch of criminals need to be prosecuted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-10 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #7
22. Certainly looks that way, doesn't it?
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
10. Special Prosecutor needed---this is huge.
K and R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-10 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
19. That is criminal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC