Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. rules out military action against Venezuela

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 11:48 AM
Original message
U.S. rules out military action against Venezuela
Source: AFP

http://www.alternet.org/rss/breaking_news/244019/us_rules_out_military__action_against_venezuela/

The United States on Monday ruled out military action against Venezuela after Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez threatened to cut off oil supplies to the US if it backed a Colombian attack.

"As we have stated in the past, the United States has no intention of engaging in military action against Venezuela," Virginia Staab, a State Department spokeswoman, told AFP.

"The United States has long enjoyed a mutually beneficial energy relationship with Venezuela, and we wish to see that relationship continue," she said.

Importing 1.4 million barrels of oil a day, the United States is the main oil consumer of Venezuela, a member of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and South America's largest oil producer and exporter.

(...)



Read more: http://www.alternet.org/rss/breaking_news/244019/us_rules_out_military__action_against_venezuela/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sad news for the the Anti-Chavez faction
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. ditto
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. lol
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
34. sounds like it's bad news for the Church of St. Hugo on here
they can't blame the US anymore

guess all they're left with is Colombia and maybe Costa Rica

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
naaman fletcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. Chavez made us back down.
We were going to attack, but Chavez outsmarted us and learned of our plans so now we have to back down. He sure is one smart fellow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. I hope that you're being sarcastic.
I think you are, but it's so fucking hard to tell on DU these days...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
naaman fletcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. LOL. yeah I was. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #22
32. Ah, this is good. I am reassured. :) nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. Vive Chavez!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T Wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. The fact that the US felt it necessary to publically state that it would not militarily attack
another nation that has done nothing to warrant an attack is scary.

And also an indication of how sick this country is in its policies.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Pleasant departure from the usual official ambiguity policies, though. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. It was a definite "slip" of the truth
now rendering reasons for such policies BS and indefensable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
31. Someone had to calm Chavez's hysterics. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ross K Donating Member (288 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
49. Naw!
Chavez is no threat to Israel! That option was never even in the room, let alone on the table!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. Well, there's the Official Denial, anyway. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rabs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. But the "denial" neglects to deny



Whether the United States would back up Colombia in the event uribito launches an attack (which Chavez implied).

Btw, speaking of uribito, be on the lookout this Wednesday for when alvarito's chief of staff (Moreno) is scheduled to testify before the Supreme Court on DASgate. It could be very BAD news for Mr. 82.

:hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Oh, I agree, rabs. We didn't invade Honduras, either.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
naaman fletcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #12
23. Colombia attacking Venezuela?
In case you haven't noticed, Chavez moved his troops to the border. Colombia has refused to do the same. Chavez is talking war. Colombia is talking peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
9. The little dictator got an official in government to say the word 'Venezuela!'
Good for the little dictator.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. Does that mean "official military action" -- or does it include coups and assassinations?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rabs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. you are right on



Last week, Chavez said the U.S. military would not dare to enter Caracas, but that would not prevent snipers from trying to take him out when he goes on his trips outside the capital.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. Maybe they are afraid of another revolution
against another US backed coup, as in "The Revolution Will Not be Televised"...a kind of "bin there done that" and it didn't work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
14. Why am I reminded of -
"There are no plans on my desk for an attack on Iraq."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
COLGATE4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
17. At the risk of being flailed by the Fearless Leader fan club
isn't it just possible that Washington was merely responding to Chavez's unprovoked statement about 'not supplying oil to US in case Colombia invades'? Although I understand that paranoids have enemies sometimes too, as Sigmund Freud once observed "sometimes a cigar is only a cigar".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. That's the ticket. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creon Donating Member (723 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
18. good news.
There is no reason for the USA to take military action.
The USA has a good business relationship with Venezuela. Venezuela sells oil and the USA buys the oil. Chavez is very well aware of that.
The bad relations between Venezuela and Columbia is the business of those two countries. The USA need not have an opinion regarding that matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. The bad relations between Colombia and Venezuela revolve around
Edited on Mon Jul-26-10 02:56 PM by EFerrari
US funding the Colombian military in order to mess with Venezuela (and Ecuador and others). It's a triangle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
COLGATE4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. That's awfully simplistic,
While relations between Colombia and Venezuela arguably have been damaged by US funding to Colombia, you are dealing with cultural differences which date back to the days of Bolivar. There has always been a love-hate relation particularly between Colombia and Venezuela and, to a lesser extent between Ecuador and Colombia due to a whole series of historical reasons and considerations. To ascribe this just to US actions with Colombia is oversimplfying the issue to the point of absurdity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Yes, it is simplistic and to the point of the US involvement at the moment.
If I feel the need to write a dissertation, I'll be sure to let you know. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
COLGATE4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. As I said before, simplistic. "My mind's made up- don't
confuse me with any facts".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #28
46. Yes, that's what you said. But I wasn't addressing you. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bacchus39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
26. Colombians Denounce Armed Raid by Venezuelan Police
yes, that is Venezuela doing the raiding not Colombia. it is Venezuela that is militarizing the border, not Colombia.



http://www.laht.com/article.asp?ArticleId=360878&CategoryId=12393

BOGOTA – Small farmers in a rural area of the northeastern Colombian province of Norte de Santander denounced a raid by armed police from neighboring Venezuela, saying the officers fired several shots in the air.

“They entered firing shots into the air, passing alongside some houses and a small school with children,” Jose Jesus Rendon, a peasant leader in San Faustino, a hamlet some 600 meters (2,000 feet) from the border with Venezuela, told Caracol Radio on Wednesday.

Tuesday’s incident sparked panic among local inhabitants, Rendon said, adding that the Venezuelans returned to their side of the border after a discussion with police in San Faustino.

Several violent incidents have occurred along the border since Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez froze relations with Colombia almost one year ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
COLGATE4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. Now - wait for the responses, which won't be long in coming .

Pick your choice:

"No, it never happened"
"No, the nasty evil Colombians wandered over the border and enticed the heroic Venezuelan police into chasing them back into Colombia"
"No, you can't believe it because XXX is the source"
"No, because Alvaro Uribe is satan's spawn and besides that it was all a CIA plot anyway"
"No, fire bad, Colombia bad"
"No, (fill in the blank with your conspiracy theory of the day)________________________________
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imajika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #30
42. You forgot...
..."No, it's a mistranslation".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
27. Flash ...they never even considered it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Than why have we surrounded Venezuela with bases?
And why are we building new ones as if there is a fire sale?

I'd hold off on the "flash" until you can verify. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
COLGATE4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. One ;possibility -
if Hugo gets desperate enough and actually starts a war with Colombia, the US intends to help it defend itself. After all, you don't think he wants to let that $5 billion in Russian armement go to waste.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #33
40. LOL. That's funny. And, btw, Venezuela doesn't even lead the region
in arms buys. But, nice try.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
COLGATE4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #40
50. That's true - Brazil does
but for a population the size of Venezuela, $5 billion in armaments is a very telling acquisition. Chavez very well knows that he (like most Venezuelan leaders) holds office only at the sufferance of the Venezuelan Armed Forces. If he doesn't keep them happy he's toast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #29
35. maybe it's a place where people like you can be shipped
:shrug:

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #35
41. People like me who watch our tax $$$ be splashed around Latin America
to defend us from ? Hugo Chavez has a big mouth but I don't think he can bite us from there. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. but you have a big mouth as well
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. Is that a distress call?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #45
51. what?
you don't have a big mouth?

or maybe it's big fingers since you post so much of your drivel on here

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raggz Donating Member (172 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
36. Washington rules out military action against Venezuela
Source: El Universal

Washington rules out military action against Venezuela

Western Hemisphere The United States rules out any military action against Venezuela, said Virginia Staab, a US State Department spokeswoman, after Venezuela's President Hugo Chávez threatened to cut oil supplies to the US if Washington supports an attack against the South American country.


Read more: http://english.eluniversal.com/2010/07/26/en_pol_esp_washington-rules-out_26A4249211.shtml



The US News is not picking this up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virgogal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SkyDaddy7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. HUH? x2!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. Dupe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
44. I should hope so! //nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
47. U.S. gov't flaks like "Virginia Staab, a State Department spokeswoman" often LIE
about what the U.S. is up to, because that's what they're told to do. They are not privy to the Pentagon's and associated war profiteers' plans, or even to the State Dept's real intentions and plans--let alone the plans of the CIA and other secret agencies. They say WHAT THEY ARE TOLD TO SAY.

So this denial is absolutely meaningless. And flak-catcher gov't spokespeople aren't the only ones who don't have a clue what might be "on the table." We, the people, are also kept clueness until the war plans, that we are paying for, are unfolded with an orchestration of lies and propaganda, which we also pay for.

One of my greatest concerns about the Pentagon's sneaky military buildup around Venezuela is that there is a plan to trigger this war that will box Obama in and give him no options. The Pentagon has a couple of thousand U.S. soldiers and military 'contractors' in Colombia, with total diplomatic immunity for all of them, no matter what they do in Colombia, and also recently got signed (by Uribe) use of at least SEVEN military bases in Colombia and use of all civilian infrastructure. Think this through. If warmongers in the Pentagon want to start a war, what they may do is embed some of these U.S. troops and/or 'contractors' with the Colombian military in creation of an incident on the Colombian/Venezuela border in which U.S. soldiers or 'contractors' get shot or killed (or a manufactured incident, like the "Gulf of Tonkin"--an invented attack). Would Obama stem the tide of rightwing cries for retaliation? Could he, if he wanted to?

This bullshit Colombia is slinging about FARC guerillas in Venezuela is just such a trigger mechanism. And I imagine that that is why Chavez has reacted the way he has. He's a former military man, and surely recognizes a "Gulf of Tonkin" in the making when he sees one.

Another concern is the 'TRADE SECRET' voting machines all over the U.S., with the code owned and nearly totally controlled (80%) by one, far rightwing corporation, ES&S (which just bought out Diebold), with virtually no audit/recount controls. The war profiteers have the capability--the EASY capability--of yanking Obama and installing a warmonger president, if Obama presents an obstacle to their plans. (Chavez called Obama "the prisoner of the Pentagon"--a charitable statement, if Obama is actually on board for Oil War II, and our tragedy if he is not.)

It appears to me that China and Russia are protecting Iran. They are why the U.S. has not attacked Iran. Who is protecting Venezuela, which controls the biggest oil reserves on earth (twice Saudi Arabia's)? Venezuela's oil must look like easy pickins to our thirsty war machine. The psyops against Chavez have been growing in intensity--worse now than ever--and they look like pre-war psyops to me. Why is our war machine funneling $7 BILLION of our tax dollars into a country with the second worst human rights record on earth, where thousands of union leaders, human rights workers, teachers, community activists, peasant farmers and others have been murdered by the Colombian military and its death squads, and some 5 MILLION poor Colombian farmers have been displaced? Why? For Hillary's "free trade for the rich"? Is that what all these billions in military aid, and widespread carnage, and U.S. military occupation of Colombia, are FOR? Or is the plan to use the extremely corrupt Colombia government and military as a front--as the U.S. did with the South Vietnamese government and military--going forward?

I don't know, but I am very, VERY concerned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BreweryYardRat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #47
55. I don't much like Chavez, but your concerns have a point.
Just because I don't like some of his policies/behavior, it doesn't mean I want to see traitorous war profiteers force the US into war with him when he's done nothing to us. We can't afford it.

I also don't much like supporting Colombia, for the reasons you mention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhiannon12866 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
48. K&R. Who would we have left to send, anyway?
The Salvation Army? :shrug: :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
COLGATE4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #48
52. Don't you know that we have unlimited military resources
and that our need to topple Fearless leader far surpasses any strategic considerations we might have, say in Afghanistian, Iraq, the Middle East and Korea, to name a few. Our secret weapon is Chuck Norris - he and a few well-trained militiamen are ready to go in and take Chavez out and a nod from Colombia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhiannon12866 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. I saw that movie...
It was called "Delta Force..." ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
53. I don't recall a call for military action against Saudi Arabia after it cut off oil imports in 1973

Graph of oil prices from 1861–2007, showing a sharp increase in 1973, and again during the 1979 energy crisis. The orange line is adjusted for inflation.

...but then, the Sauds are friends and business partners of the Bush Family. I guess it pays to know low friends in high places...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC