Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rangel, ethics committee in last-minute bargaining

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 01:29 PM
Original message
Rangel, ethics committee in last-minute bargaining
Source: AP

WASHINGTON – The Associated Press has learned that New York Democrat Charles Rangel is making a last-minute effort to settle his ethics case. A settlement would mean that Rangel must agree that he committed some ethical misconduct.

The talks were confirmed by people familiar with the situation, but who were not authorized to be quoted by name.

Rangel stepped down earlier this year as chairman of the tax-writing Ways and Means Committee because of an earlier ethics charge. A settlement would spare him an embarrassing ethics trial. It also would be a relief for other Democrats, who fear that an dragged-out ethics proceeding during the fall election campaign would hurt their ability to maintain their House majority.

The ethics committee's trial phase has been scheduled to commence Thursday afternoon.




Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100727/ap_on_go_co/us_rangel_ethics_6
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. The ethics commitee cuts deals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I know, right?
:rofl::wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. If there is a settlement, it should include his resignation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. exactly
he needs to go
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Not much incentive for him if that's the case.
Settlements almost always involve something less than the worst-case punishment for the offender... and I don't see this resulting in jail time... so why settle?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Any evidence, particularly his own testimony, may be used against him...
in a criminal trial.

If I were him, I would resign and hope that a prosecutor would think that was enough of a punishment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. He needs to take his unfortunate hair and go.
Seriously....someone smarter than me should do a retrospective of Congressional ethics violators and their hairstyles....it would prove telling, I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selena Harris Donating Member (273 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. Is this a vendetta?
Rangel has been talking for some time now about the reistatement of the draft.In fact, he has a bill in the works that is supposed to go to committee shortly, if I am not mistaken.

If a draft were reinstituted, war would not be as profitable for the MIC,as public protests would make Congress think twice about more wars and war funding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plucketeer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Nah,
We'd rather cut our noses off to spite our faces. After all - everyone else is perfect. Why shouldn't we hold our reps to that same standard???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-10 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. Yes
The New York Times has a vendetta against Rangel.
It's not "ethics", it's local politics.

What a delight to see Rangel stay in the House.
And a pleasure to see the Times lose!


http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2008/12/04/charlie-rangel-v-the-new-york-times/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeBlueInRhody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-10 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Yeah, what a pleasure to have another strike against us come November
Now Rethugs can have their own '06 election victory dance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
9. "bargaining"?
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
russspeakeasy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
10. "Charlie the Thief"
should have been in prison 20 years ago. Orange jumpsuits are the only thing that get any attention.

I hope, hope, hope, your cell is crowded...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
classysassy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-10 02:30 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Charlie
will never be convicted,he know where the bodies are buried.The other crooks in the house will protect him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC