Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pentagon Slams WikiLeaks' Plan to Post More War Logs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
steve2470 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-10 08:56 AM
Original message
Pentagon Slams WikiLeaks' Plan to Post More War Logs
Source: Wall Street Journal

U.S. defense officials on Thursday responded angrily to WikiLeaks' plan to post additional Afghan war logs, with Defense Secretary Robert Gates suggesting that the move could further endanger the lives of Afghans who helped the U.S. war effort.

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, speaking to a group in London by video link on Thursday, said his group had gone through 7,000 of the 15,000 documents the group has so far withheld from publishing. WikiLeaks had said it was withholding posting those documents until it had time to review them to block out the names of sources contained in the documents.

"Absolutely," he replied when asked whether he still plans to publish the remaining documents.

The organization has already released some 76,000 classified documents covering the war in Afghanistan from 2004 to 2010, leaked by a source the website has refused to identify.

Read more: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704407804575425900461793766.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
burnsei sensei Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-10 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Fungi and rot don't survive the light of day.
If Pentagon policies showed any wisdom at all, Pentagon "officials" would not even tremble at Wikileaks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greiner3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-10 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. "Fungi and rot don't survive the light of day. .."
Neither do vampires. Down with Twilight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burnsei sensei Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-10 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Forever Knight was the best vampire show.
Much better than Twilight from what I've heard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-10 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. I have a sneaking suspicion ...
... that "the Pentagon" is secretly quite happy about Wikileaks' actions.

Team Obama, too.

It gets them off a large, sharp, and otherwise unavoidable hook.

--d!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-10 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Clarify?
thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-10 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. I think they want a reason to wrap it up -- soon
There is likely to be a hot potato or two in the batch that will allow "us" to leave in disgust -- and avoid the Republicans hammering us for being weak or some such nonsense.

TPTB probably know the contents of what Wikileaks has, and are putting on a show, particularly since Wikileaks is careful to scrub the documents of non-essential, sensitive, and potentially life-threatening information.

In other words, I think Wikileaks may be functioning as a high-profile back channel in this case.

--d!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-10 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. the Republican in charge of the military hates it when the US people know what's going on nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-10 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
5. Impotent rage. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downwinder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-10 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. or posturing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-10 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Well, it is important for the Pentagon not to look impotent, so yeah. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimnasium Donating Member (202 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-10 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
7. Well, as long as they release docs from *'s years...
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-10 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
9. What was it President Bush said?
Something like "People who haven't done anything wrong have nothing to hide," or "People who are hiding something have usually done something wrong"? I think that having paid the bill for these two invasions and occupations, I'm kind of entitled to see what my money bought for me: Does it enhance my country's global standing, or am I more at risk from retribution because of crimes against humanity committed in my name with my money?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-10 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
10. Guess we should just pull them out
Consider it a "force protection" action. With all these leaks, we'll just have to bring 'em home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-10 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
11. Squirm you fucking cock roaches! WTF are you worried about?
Edited on Fri Aug-13-10 11:57 AM by L0oniX
It's only the underlings that get prosecuted for war crimes. Everyone else gets away with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-10 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
14. withholding posting those documents until it had time to review them
"withholding posting those documents until it had time to review them to block out the names of sources contained in the documents"


Why didn't they use the same due diligence with the 1st batch?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-10 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
15. Go Wikileaks..take the rotten war criminals down! The defense dept should worry ..
Edited on Fri Aug-13-10 05:18 PM by flyarm
after all parents, and wives and children of our soldiers have had years of worry! And many have had to suffer the funerals of their fallen in this illegal war of Fucking lies!

The people of the countries we invaded for the greed of few, have had years of worry and loss of loved ones and living in uninhabitable lands because of our defense dept and our pentagon and the criminals in the highest offices of this land of ours..squirm you MTF'ers! Squirm!

may you bastards live with nightmares of being picked up in the middle of the night and worry about getting the Gitmo treatment!
Or the torture you ordered!

Squirm you rotten pricks!

The Pentagon papers were held for 4 years before being published, had they been published sooner..that black wall would have been much smaller! And less of my peers names would be on it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC