Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GOP to unveil new ‘Contract with America’ Thursday

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 03:30 PM
Original message
GOP to unveil new ‘Contract with America’ Thursday
Source: RawStory.com / AP

House Republicans are planning to unveil a roughly 20-point election-year policy agenda Thursday at a hardware store in suburban Virginia.

GOP officials said party leaders will go public with a plan focused on jobs, spending, health care, national security and reforming Congress. They'll brief lawmakers on it late Wednesday.

The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the plan. It comes six weeks before midterm congressional elections in which Democrats are bracing for major losses, possibly big enough to cost them control of the House.

Republicans unveiled their "Contract with America" on Sept. 20, 1994, some six weeks before gaining 54 seats and seizing control of the House for the first time in 40 years.

Read more: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/09/gop-unveil-contract-americastyle-plan-thursday/



20 points! I guess that makes it twice as good as the original Contract On With America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Your record speaks louder than your words. #1 on your contract expand the tax cuts for the rich
permanently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wonder if they'll include term limits in this one
They sort of ignored it after they put it in the 1994 version.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
38. The Extreme Court ruled them unconstitutional
:shrug: I still don't understand why term limits are legal for elected President and vice Presidents but not Congress critters...:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-10 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #38
41. The 22nd Amendment is the difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. I said a while back Democrats needed to do something like this.
Yeah it's a gimmick but people eat this shit up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. They should have one and announce it at the EXACT same time as the GOP.
Edited on Mon Sep-20-10 03:50 PM by onehandle
I wonder which event Fox News would cover live?

A split screen would be 'fair and balanced.'

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. I would do a 2 part thing. 1. What we accomplished (I know, I know)
2. What we plan to accomplish. I think the House has been pretty decent but the Senate sucks ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #9
37. September 23 is when some healthcare provisions go into affect
Obama should preempt their dog and pony show. They could complain, but that date was scheduled 6 months ago - it was in the legislation - as 6 months from the day enacted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. not only that, but voters don't seem to care
what does or doesn't get accomplished after you've swept into office, like the last contract...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. New Contract ON America --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laylah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
22. Exactly +1 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #4
29. indeed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hestia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #4
34. That was my first thought too, D&D - live through the last "contract"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. Those planks will look real good under Obama's veto pen
The rest will die in Senate filibusters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
auburngrad82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. They never honored one aspect of their previous Contract On America
Google it. They did nothing other than make promises.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. They were very clever in only promising a floor vote on the various planks
and only in the House. No promise was made that anything would be enacted into law.

I like the congressional term limits plank, for example. A vote was held as promised on the House floor, it failed, and that was that. Not a word about term limits for the next 15 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. they obviously didn't try very hard on term limits and some of the others
once they actually got INTO office as a majority...

funny, because the two hardest things they ran on were a balanced budget and term limits...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 03:50 AM
Response to Reply #6
30. They honored exactly one aspect of it
They got the line-item veto through. Unfortunately, a Democratic president used it on a Republican bill and it was declared unconstitutional--because it IS.

But of the things the Constitution allows them to do, they batted .000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
32. They started back-pedaling big-time on the term limits thing before
the ink was even dry on their precious contract!! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Francesca9 Donating Member (379 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-10 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #6
42. but they took control of Congress for 14 years this way
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. I can tell you a couple of things
1 - Cut taxes
2 - Cut taxes
3 - Enrich the rich
4 - Pass only laws to benefit corporations
5 - Let the poor and middle class defend for themselves
6 - Cut taxes

Does that cover it.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. You forgot one.
7. Cut taxes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plucketeer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. and #8 is
cut taxes on the wealthy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
COLGATE4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #7
31. Don't forget: No Gay marriage, no abortion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. Oh, they've got a plan for America, alright.
Edited on Mon Sep-20-10 04:15 PM by tanyev
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savalez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
11. This bullshit again? effen eh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
12. Twenty points, eh?
Edited on Mon Sep-20-10 04:00 PM by madmax
WTF did they do in 8 years of dim son? :beer:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sadbear Donating Member (799 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
15. All Democrats have to do is point out what the last contract brought us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
18. Isn't it kinda Satanic to schedule this for a Full Moon?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #18
35. What do DUers know about satanism? Have you asked O'Donnell?
Edited on Tue Sep-21-10 09:59 AM by No Elephants
If she doesn't know, she'll at least make up something, like a midnight picnic on a bloody altar for her first date.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Safetykitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
20. When the party of the first part decides in it's batshittiness...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberswede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
21. At a hardware store - where better to unveil their plan to hammer the middle class? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jimbo S Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. These guys are nuts.
We're the ones about to get screwed.

OK, I know, enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
classysassy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
23. Will the American buy into the republicans
latest scam?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KatyaR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
24. So that'll be one more document for Rachel to nail to her "door."
She's gonna run out of room soon....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
25. Veto! Veto! Veto!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteveG Donating Member (833 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
26. Don't they mean Contract On America? n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
28. Trying to rekindle the "good old days", I see
This... will not end well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rocknrule Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
33. Let me guess
The first point is cutting taxes for billionaires. The other 19 points are different countries to invade and/or minority groups to persecute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
36. Note they selected the day that many health care provisions go into place
I hope that President Obama uses that day to trumpet the new improvements in place. It will affect any family with a kid under 26, but over the current cutoff for employee insurance in a very positive way.

He needs to show the families and individuals helped.

This will help people who need it the most - those with a pre-existing condition or people with insurance who, in the past, lost it just because they used it.

There are probably as common, but less drastic gains. For example, I have three girls, 20, 22, and 25. This will give the 25 year old grad student and the 22 year old Americorps volunteer, when she starts graduate school, insurance - and will insure the youngest insurance if there is a gap between graduating college and getting an elementary school job. There are likely twenty somethings here, under 26, who will now be able to get insurance from their parents' plans. You do not need to be living or financially dependent on that parent. (You can even be married!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
39. Haven't We Suffered Enough?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
40. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, won't get fooled again
:rofl:

Not another Contract on America. Don't think we'll buy that shit twice. How many republicans will be a part of something that back in 1994 they vowed term limits.

Think about it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC