Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ahmed Ghailani, the first Guantanamo detainee tried in civilian court, found not guilty on all but

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 06:23 PM
Original message
Ahmed Ghailani, the first Guantanamo detainee tried in civilian court, found not guilty on all but
Edited on Wed Nov-17-10 06:35 PM by dipsydoodle
Source: Sky News

The first suspect transferred from the Guantanamo military prison to face a US civilian court is found not guilty of terrorism charges.

Will need amending and updating.

Read more: http://news.sky.com/skynews/



refers to :

Ahmed Khalfan Ghailani, 36, a Tanzanian from Zanzibar, is accused of conspiring in the 1998 al Qaeda car bomb attacks on U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania that killed 224 people.

Not guilty on all counts other than a single charge of destroying public property.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is why there's been such opposition to civilian trials
Everyone will find out about the complete lack of justice from our government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doremus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
25. What are you talking about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. The right has been mightily opposed to non-military trials for Gitmo detainees
I think it's because the outcome is too hard to rig ... or to cover up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. All news agencies still showing twitter links only
Edited on Wed Nov-17-10 06:34 PM by dipsydoodle
on their blogs e.g. http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2010/11/17/verdict-ahmed-ghailani/

Ahmed Ghailani, the first Guantanamo detainee tried in civilian court, was found not guilty on all counts except one in connection with the 1998 bombing of U.S. Embassies in Africa.

Ghailani was convicted of conspiracy to destroy public property. He was charged with conspiracy and murder in the 1998 attacks on embassies in Nairobi, Kenya, and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. BBC and Reuters links now up
Edited on Wed Nov-17-10 06:41 PM by dipsydoodle
Former Guantanamo Bay detainee Ahmed Ghailani has been convicted of just one count of terrorism conspiracy over the 1998 bombings of US embassies in Africa.

In the first civilian trial of a former Guantanamo inmate, the Tanzanian was found guilty of conspiracy to damage or destroy US property with explosives.

But he was cleared of many other counts including murder and murder conspiracy.

The verdict comes as the US considers holding other civilian terror trials.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-11782346

Reuters) - The first suspect transferred from the Guantanamo military prison to face a U.S. civilian court was found not guilty of terrorism charges on Wednesday by a federal jury in New York.

Ahmed Khalfan Ghailani, 36, a Tanzanian from Zanzibar, had been accused of conspiring in the 1998 al Qaeda car bomb attacks on U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania that killed 224 people. The jury found him guilty of one relatively minor charge of conspiracy to damage or destroy U.S. property by means of an explosive device.

Ghailani was cleared of 276 murder and attempted murder counts, along with five other conspiracy charges.

http://in.reuters.com/article/idINIndia-52987420101117
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. Fox is going after this like mad dogs. "Failure" Blow to ADM.
Blow to Eric Holder. Gr-----grhhhhhhhhhhhh, as they
chew the "bone". They are saying this is proof Courts
cannot be used. Go back to Miliary Tribunals. grh------
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
appleannie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Guess it never occurred to them you need proof.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nuclear Unicorn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. The president and AG seemed pretty sure they had proof
Say good-bye to civilian trials because I doubt the president wants to risk political suicide.

I'm not saying that's the right thing, it isn't, but if Ghailiani had been found not guilty on all counts Obama would either detain him without charges or watch him walk away.

If the former he would destroy any all credibility he once held because even his lame-brained predecessor would have at least given a nod to facades of justice via military tribunals. If the latter the MSM would reinforce the narrative that Obama allowed a killer to walk free because he was a weak-kneed liberal.

Either way it would be the end of his presidency for all intents and purposes.

So it's back to dispensing justice at sunny Gitmo unless he's willing to see the rest of his term crippled.

They called it a test case and they barely survived.

This is a bad day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 06:11 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Some evidence was deemed inadmissable
due the fact it was obtained under duress. That evidence was obtained when Obama was not your President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nuclear Unicorn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. Yes, but that tells me Obama and Holder still intended to use that evidence
And considered it valid.

They presented it in court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. Fair comment.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #8
18. Really? A bad day for what exactly
There's a reason Lady Justice is blindfolded. If a jury of Americans found Ghailiani not guilty then maybe there was simply not any evidence to convict. That's what our justice system is based on. Does it make life a little harder for Obama because FOX decided our justice system is not good? Yes. But since when is FOX running this country? Because if what FOX says is what has to be done, then this country is already screwn!!11!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nuclear Unicorn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. A bad day for the political straits the president finds himself in
While your observation is fair beyond argument there will be a political price to pay so either Obama becomes what he campaigned against or the electorate will replace him for someone who has no compunctions about waterboarding and military tribunals.

Not an approval, just an observation.

*sighs*

At least we can hold each other while we cry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Only because Obama missed his chance in the beginning
He could have said "Let's review the evidence against these people and see if the Bush Admin were holding them with cause."

Had he done that, he could have let all of Gitmo go with an apology(Which wouldn't stain him since he can blame it on past Admin), and this whole mess would have been over.

Instead, he embraced the tar baby.

I have no sympathy, btw. You keep it going, you own it too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nuclear Unicorn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. That's a tremendous charge of incompetence
I'm sure the DoJ knew exactly what their case was based upon. After all, they presented it. They called it a test case.

Of course that moves us from "incompetent" to "heinous".

Not that that makes us feel any better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NRaleighLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. CBS news was gleefully trumpeting the "utter disaster for the administration"
:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Disaster for the Administration That Put This Guy in Gitmo, More Like
He should never have been in Gitmo in the first place.
It wasn't the OBAMA administration that put him there!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 06:25 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. The MSM has received their talking points
and as usual they're giving opinions not facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. Sooo, what if he was actually innocent? There seems to be an assumption that because he was in Gitm
and was held by the CIA at a secret overseas camp for 2 years he must be guilty. What if, as the jury seems to think, he wasn't guilty and there had been a military tribunal instead?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveLiberal Donating Member (99 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
10. Why is Gitmo still open ?
Because I vaguely recall a promise to shut it down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cstanleytech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Why? Politics.
Not saying I approve of it though because I dont, just that I understand is all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
13. Interesting the way in which headlines change
BBC's headline now says "Ghailani guilty over 1998 embassy bombings"

but then continues to clarify by saying :

The first Guantanamo detainee tried in a US civilian court has been found guilty on just one out of 285 terror charges over the 1998 bombings of US embassies in Africa.

Tanzanian Ahmed Ghailani, 36, was found guilty of conspiracy to damage or destroy US property with explosives.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-11782346

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 06:26 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. AP this morning
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 06:55 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. The day before the verdict
White House Drops Plans to Close Gitmo :

THE Washington Post is reporting the Obama administration has effectively abandoned plans to close the Guantánamo Bay prison. Administration officials said they do not expect to secure congressional funding to close the prison and transfer remaining prisoners to the United States. One official said, "Gitmo is going to remain open for the foreseeable future." The White House also says it expects Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the self-proclaimed mastermind of the 9/11 attacks, to remain jailed without trial indefinitely. (Democracy Now)

http://www.granma.cu/ingles/international-i/16-noviembre-white.html

In passing - the town of Guantanamo is regarded as being one of the most beautiful on the whole island - even more so than Trinidad. Its been removed from normal tours of the island but where travallers make their own arrangements with Cuban guides they invariably go there as a must see. There was a lookout post some distance from the camp for tourists with binoculars but that been taken off limits now. The area between the camp and the town has also allegedly now been mined but I'm not sure by whom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sally cat Donating Member (544 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
21. Didn't he confess to killing over two hundred people? Maybe not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
24601 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
24. If the Nazi leadership had been tried in a US District Court instead
of the Nuremberg Tribunal, Hermann Goering would have been convicted only of misdemeanor disorderly conduct and sentenced to time served. Charges against Hess would have been dismissed before trial since the British treated him badly by initially isolating him in the Tower of London and for eavesdropping on him in Mytchett Place without a warrant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC