|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Newsjock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 12:28 AM Original message |
Court Rebuffs Obama on Warrantless Cell-Site Tracking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hardrada (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 12:31 AM Response to Original message |
1. I feel now what I did when the courts would stop Nixon doing stuff. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
avaistheone1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 01:11 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. I have said before on many issues Obama is to the right of Nixon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 02:44 AM Response to Reply #4 |
10. Ah, but perhaps the Powers that Be required someone like Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katandmoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 12:35 AM Response to Original message |
2. Does anyone really think this ruling will stop them? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sherman A1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 06:30 AM Response to Reply #2 |
14. Not at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harun (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 08:37 AM Response to Reply #2 |
18. No way. They'll just cloak it behind National Security. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Downwinder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 12:41 AM Response to Original message |
3. Does this mean I need a Court Order to put a tracker on a Government vehicle? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
villager (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 02:17 AM Response to Original message |
5. once again, we have to root for the few remaining decent judges to rein in a President |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
villager (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 02:17 AM Response to Original message |
6. the software wishes to emphasize my point by repeating it twice! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Celtic Raven (415 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 10:42 AM Response to Reply #6 |
24. Bears repeating |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
obxhead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 02:38 AM Response to Original message |
7. A small victory against some of the nonsense of this admin. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saigon68 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 02:40 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Eric Holder house boy to the ruling class |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nyy1998 (984 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 09:17 AM Response to Reply #9 |
20. No, he has to defend every law, even the ones he may not like. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bragi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 09:45 AM Response to Reply #20 |
23. Can you explain that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
obxhead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 12:59 PM Response to Reply #20 |
25. No, Holder only has to keep the boss happy by doing the bosses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nyy1998 (984 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-17-10 12:34 PM Response to Reply #25 |
28. no, no it isn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 02:38 AM Response to Original message |
8. k/r |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 02:52 AM Response to Original message |
11. Fuck Bush! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Monk06 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 03:42 AM Response to Original message |
12. Barack Obama is not in charge of this administration. He's just as much a hand puppet as GWB. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truth2power (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 04:32 AM Response to Reply #12 |
13. That's letting him off the hook, don't you think? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sirthomas66 (336 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 09:06 AM Response to Reply #12 |
19. Yep. Has been true since the very beginning. And the strange |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
obxhead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 01:00 PM Response to Reply #12 |
26. So who controls the strings? Where should we shift our blame? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hubert Flottz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 07:08 AM Response to Original message |
15. Shit creek gets deeper every day. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zbdent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 08:02 AM Response to Original message |
16. courts remember they have "balls" when it's a Democrat in charge ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 08:31 AM Response to Original message |
17. I want to know who suggests, approves and initiates these activities. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NikRik (185 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 09:37 AM Response to Reply #17 |
21. As technology moves forward ..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CanonRay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 09:37 AM Response to Original message |
22. Courts? Courts? We don't need no stinking courts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hardrada (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 01:59 PM Response to Reply #22 |
27. Current rulers have a thing for military tribunals anyway. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 10:33 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC