Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

From the Pentagon to the private sector (Exposes 'Militarization of US Economy")

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-10 12:04 PM
Original message
From the Pentagon to the private sector (Exposes 'Militarization of US Economy")
Source: Boston Globe

From the Pentagon to the private sector
In large numbers, and with few rules, retiring generals are taking lucrative defense-firm jobs

Published on Sunday, December 26, 2010 by The Boston Globe

by Bryan Bender
............................

Among the Globe findings:

■ Dozens of retired generals employed by defense firms maintain Pentagon advisory roles, giving them unparalleled levels of influence and access to inside information on Department of Defense procurement plans.

■ The generals are, in many cases, recruited for private sector roles well before they retire, raising questions about their independence and judgment while still in uniform. The Pentagon is aware and even supports this practice.

■ The feeder system from some commands to certain defense firms is so powerful that successive generations of commanders have been hired by the same firms or into the same field. For example, the last seven generals and admirals who worked as Department of Defense gatekeepers for international arms sales are now helping military contractors sell weapons and defense technology overseas.

■ When a general-turned-businessman arrives at the Pentagon, he is often treated with extraordinary deference - as if still in uniform - which can greatly increase his effectiveness as a rainmaker for industry. The military even has name for it - the "bobblehead effect.''

.....................

“It is the militarization of the economy,’’ Clark said in a recent interview.

Read more: http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2010/12/26/defense_firms_lure_retired_generals/?page=full



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-10 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. How's that "support the troops" thing working out?
Yea I know ...if there wasn't a volunteer military then they would draft us ...but then there would be rebellion. They can't continue with their wars and dirty war profits without troops. Over a trillion $ this year spent on the pentagon ...Russia spent 50 billion. When is this insanity going to be stopped?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soryang Donating Member (642 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-10 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. The notion of "chinese walls" and "personal integrity"
Edited on Sun Dec-26-10 01:12 PM by soryang
...are absurd when it comes to ethical regulations. As soon as these lame expressions are used to defend access to inside information when a private agency relationship exists with a contractor, you know you are dealing with a corrupt relationship.

The waiting period should be five years to at least create the appearance of an arms length relationship. In the alternative, Flag officers who wish to follow the one year and two year limits should be forced to forfeit their commisions and retirements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-10 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. More evidence that war profiteering should be the focus of the "deficit" commission.
Not ripping up the safety nets we desperately need after the economic crash of Supply Side Economics.

The deficit commission could be entirely focused on undoing war profiteering-- figuring out how to cut military spending by 50% is a tough job. How to divide the sacrifice among the many states in which weapons production is located and turn those industries toward production of life sustaining technologies like more efficient mass transit and green engineering.

How to deprivatize military services. When the military did the cooking, plumbing and electrical jobs in house, we got double duty for our tax dollars. Those assignments served as job training too-- giving our soldiers broadly marketable skills for when they left the service. When we privatized them we got moldy food, soldiers electrocuted in their showers and extra torture by private contractors absolved from prosecution.

Furthermore, the billions expended in Afghanistan, long after the Bush administration allowed Bin Laden to escape to Pakistan, could have been so much more effective at quelling opposition if they were used on civilian projects like building schools, infrastructure and hospitals. Seduction by upgrading infrastructure to support small local businesses is a lot more effective than murdering civilians. But we haven't really tried it because we have invested decades in building up the military industrial complex and privatizing military expenditures under the direction of Dick Cheney since he was Secretary of Defense, then CEO of private contractor Halliburton, then back to government as VP to reap more rewards in the pre-planned war on Iraq.

I had great hopes for at least a Truth & Reconciliation Commission because taking a clearer look at the brutal crimes committed in our name would have prepared our population for a much deeper review of our military operations and policies than we have ever had. In spite of our billions of spending, as much as all other nations combined, our Bush military thought we still needed to commit war crimes like torture to achieve our objectives. Does that sound like our expenditures were effective at all? We really needed to examine that in all its horror-- seeing that billions spent on decades of brutal warfare and hundreds of "national security" and intelligence agencies couldn't stop the country that prosecuted torturers after WWII from committing torture itself-- that could have put us on a new footing.

It is so depressing that our military industrial complex has gotten too strong to choose peaceful seduction over mass murder, even as we need massive international cooperation in greening what we can to stabilize our warming planet.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-10 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. You are right, Overseas
If you want something done right, do it yourself.

We actually won wars back before we privatized our military.

Why in the world would we want competing contractors providing services to our troops. We need a military that is supported by a cohesive services function. The system we have now is not working.

In the military, the enlisted cook who steals from the kitchen or fails to provide the best quality food possible under the circumstances has to answer to his or her commanding officer. The contractors do not. In fact, it is easier to replace members of the military than to replace a contractor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-10 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. and War is a racket......
retired officers & Generals have always been a boon to the cooperate world to sit on boards, etc...they used to run for President now they don't have to to be the King.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-10 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrdmk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-10 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. K& R a must read...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-10 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. Just like going from Congress to lobbyist. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-10 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. So, this is what "civilian control of the military" really means.
When will Americans get angry enough to do something besides post?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lanlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-10 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
9. and all on the US taxpayer dime
These high-ranking officers benefit from an extremely generous and downright socialistic system of perks--their housing, education, travel, their family's health care FOR LIFE, their guaranteed pensions, right down to their final resting place--everything is paid for by the US taxpayer. And most of these guys, mind you, haven't seen combat in 20 years, since we keep the Brass at a good distance from hot combat zones. Then, upon retirement still in the prime of life (early-mid 50s), they turn and around and shake down that taxpayer money tree for profits for whatever defense contractor they sign up with.

And adding insult to injury--they typically vote Republican, because, you know, socialism is evil.

:mad::mad::mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-10 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
11. War is our biggest export.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC