Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Airport body scanners, pat-downs to stay, Napolitano says

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 07:32 AM
Original message
Airport body scanners, pat-downs to stay, Napolitano says
Source: USA Today

The nation's controversial airport pat-downs and full-body scanners are here to stay, at least for now.

Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano defended the systems on CNN this morning, crediting them with preventing unknown numbers of potentially dangerous devices from making their way on to airplanes.

"The new technology, the pat-downs, is just objectively safer for our traveling public," Napolitano said. "We pick up contraband now, and we pick up more contraband with the new procedures and the new machinery. What we know is that you can't measure the devices that we are deterring from going on a plane."

Read more: http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2010/12/airport-body-scanners-pat-downs-working-napolitano-says/1



Ah, the smell of 'changiness' in the morning... smells like... same ol' BS. :argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. "contraband" = weed
these dinos are getting all sorts of busts i bet.. im working against them 2012
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
54. Bingo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
molly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
57. See any correlation in Raygun's firing air traffic controllers
Pilots on food stamps and now the TSA groping. Could someone not want US to travel? Destroy every business in the US?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #57
75. It really seems that way.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timtom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. Of course, Janet dear. We understand completely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
social_critic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. I need some technical advice
I want to have some slogans painted on my body next time I fly. These will have to be done using some sort of ink the bastards can see, but which won't be seen through my clothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downwinder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Lead based paint should do nicely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #5
25. The person will end up going to jail
That's bad enough. Getting lead poisoning as well? Not a great deal. Many people think the skin is a barrier but it's actually the body's biggest organ and as such, has a great deal of back and forth with the environment. Iodine is another thing that could be absorbed in quantities that would be bad for the thyroid.

I've thought of various protests but in the end, I've decided to protest with my wallet. I won't fly. I will ride the train and drive. There are many things I might have gone to do, conferences and the like, but now the distance precludes it. It's a sacrifice but necessary, not only for my health, but for my dignity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downwinder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. I thought the sarcasm would be obvious.
Better just body paint sans clothes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #27
69. Yeah, had we not just had another conversation about a similar topic,
I would have caught that. LOL. I had planned, well over a year ago, before these things proliferated like cancer, to have a protest at the airport, standing in the backscatter position, naked, with protest signs in each hand. I was told by my husband that he didn't care for the mother of his son going to jail. I relented. I wish I hadn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downwinder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #69
71. I have been considering a chain mail shirt if I should ever happen to fly again.
Should be proof against Tasers, microwave weapons and backscatter.

After 17 years as an air carrier pilot, back when they still served food, I doubt I will ever be a passenger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 04:41 AM
Response to Reply #71
79. I hope you don't mean that you know how dangerous it is to fly
just that it's too much of a pain in the ass if you don't even get to touch the controls. I've always been a white knuckle flier, so I'm kind of relieved to be offing that burden. I wish I had visited Hawaii first, but, oh, well, it isn't like I don't live in one of the most beautiful places in the US.

What in the world would your chain mail be made of to be Taser-proof? I'm thinking that would be electrocution central.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downwinder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 05:17 AM
Response to Reply #79
83. Rest assured, flying is with or without terrorists the safest way to travel.
I told somebody recently that given a choice between going to jail and flying commercially I would choose jail. The strip search in jail is less invasive, stress positions are outlawed (what is sitting in a center seat between two three hundred pounders?), you have a right to habeas corpus in jail (on an aircraft you can get stuck on the taxiway with no rights) and they have to feed you in jail. I use much the same argument about nursing homes.

Maybe they will start up the Matson Lines again, barring that you might take a freighter with accommodations to Hawaii.

Chain mail should be able to short out the two probes from a Taser. I haven't tried it out yet, but soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #25
35. Why would someone go to jail for writing a slogan on their own body?
Do we still have the freedom of speech?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #35
68. No
And especially not with Fatherland Security. Have you tried practicing your freedom of speech with those brownshirts? I wouldn't recommend it unless you have a lot of free time on your hands. And money, for bail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Iodine should work for the back-scatter X-Ray.
I don't know if that will show up on the millimeter-wave systems.
Metallic inks should work for both, but might not be good for you.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. Possibly zinc oxide like people use on their nose for sunblock....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
4. Random body cavity searches are next
they will make you safer

Submit, peon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. And Americans will complain, then submit.
Because we've forgotten what our rights used to be.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #7
18. Not forgotten
Americans are sheep now, and just like the German people prior to WWII, we are on a dangerous road.

So, tell me again why men and women are wearing the uniform of the U.S., because it sure isn't to protect our freedoms!

They dropped that ball when the Patriot Act was passed.

America will either end up like Soviet Russia or Nazi Germany, neither is a good thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sirthomas66 Donating Member (336 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 09:51 AM
Original message
Dupe
Edited on Mon Dec-27-10 09:51 AM by sirthomas66

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sirthomas66 Donating Member (336 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #18
34. Someone finally said it:
"So, tell me again why men and women are wearing the uniform of the U.S., because it sure isn't to protect our freedoms!"

The men and women are wearing the uniform because it is simply a job to make money, facilitated by Defense being the United States's only product. The next big assignment will be to defend the government from its own citizens. But unlike Russia when the troops refused to fire on its own people, the US troops, now hardened from slaying children and torturing old men at will, will cut us down like dogs in our own neighborhoods regardless of whether we call Bernie Sanders or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boudica the Lyoness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #34
43. I agree
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #18
41. This is Barney Fife Security Theatre
and they plan on expanding this shit to shopping malls, movie theatres and concert venues this year.

Soon, you will not be able to eat a Big Mac without some extra from "Deliverance" sticking his finger on your prostate/cervix.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
molly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #18
58. In the movie Capitalism a Love Story
Wal Mart called their employees peasants and took out life insurance policies on them . Wal Mart is the beneficiary. Bank of America does the same thing. Do not shop or bank at either one of them. One way to stop the insanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sirthomas66 Donating Member (336 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #7
33. And we are consummate wimps...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. Not sure on the "safer" part...
But I bet they pick up more "contraband" that way.

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Meeker Morgan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
8. I will say the war is over ...
... when I can just buy a ticket and get on an airplane again.

It's been a long long time. Since long before the 9-11 massacre.

Eternal warfare has the been bi-partisan official policy for most of my life and I'm not so young.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
11. Les cut this program to reduce the deficit. It don't work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pecwae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
12. SSDD
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
13. I did not vote for a police state in 2008. n/t
:mad:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Exactly. On the contrary, I voted to END the police state
stupid me to believe in that "change we can believe in" crap. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #15
36. Because Obama promised to end airport security checkpoints

Uh, not
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #36
38. He promised to restore the Rule of Law
which this clearly violates. Nice try, though. Have some more Kool-Aid®. Extra choco-rations for you, loyal citizen!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #38
45. I see...

And what law does it clearly violate?

In your answer, please start with U.S. vs Davis, 482 F.2d 893.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #13
20. Oh yes you did
Getting lied to sucks, don't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Tell me lies, tell me sweet little lies..
-Fleetwood Mac
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
molly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #13
59. I voted for Obama and not Hillary
But got another clinton administration which , to me, was very destructive to the US.TPTB want hillary. Only problem dems. and repubs. do not like her. So Obama's administration is packed with clinton retreads. Lanny Davis in Africa now propping up another dictator..just like Honduras.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timtom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #13
70. As it turns out, you did.
As did I and most others here at DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 04:56 AM
Response to Reply #70
80. +
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill O Rights Donating Member (23 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #13
84. Fantastically well put!
We voted AGAINST the party that lied us into war, the implemented torture, and inflicted the Patriot Act upon our nation. And now the guy that was supposed to end the wars, increased them, continued the torture, instituted assassination squads for American citizens and continued the Patriot Act is unleashing an army of power-mad neo-gestapos on us.

We can no longer trust ANYONE, and we must ALWAYS defend every aspect of the Bill of Rights.

Because if we let them get away this, and considering that they will keep the War On Terror going on for the next 50 years, where will Freedom be then? Nothing but a distant memory?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
14. Look into my brown eye Janet.........
I have something for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
16. What a crock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
one-eyed fat man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
17. Every indiginity inflicted
Makes me more and more grateful that I learned to fly back in 1965. It may not be as fast as a jetliner, but for trips of 600 miles or so my puddle jumper can beat most airline connections.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downwinder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. You mean there is no full body scan on the FBO side of the field?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
one-eyed fat man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #19
32. That's another benefit.
Most small FBO's know their customers by sight. They might not remember your name, but the line crew remembers your N-number. Real airplanes have round engines and tailwheels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
22. And, Ms. Napolitano, if your goal was to get me to stop using air travel
you have achieved your goal. Short of a death in my husband's family, I will not fly again.

You may not be able to measure the "devices that we are deterring from going on a plane.", but you can measure how many humans are being deterred. Ask us, we'll happily tell you. Oh, wait, you don't really want to know that, do you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
23. NO. HELL NO. FUCKING NO.
THIS IS NOT OVER YET.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bragi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
24. Yep, the "test" worked!
Turns out Americans are now so docile, they will accept any indignity while traveling, if you tell them with a straight face that it's for security.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #24
53. Americans could get TSA to back down simply by refusing to fly in
such great numbers that the airlines would have no choice but to take notice and start applying pressure on the government goons. I realize that some air travel is necessary - family emergency, company travel that the boss insists on, but Americans could bring the airlines, and in turn, TSA, to their knees if they gave up all discretionary flying. It's Americans willingness to submit to this crap that keeps it going.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #53
62. 4.3 million people were expected to fly over this holiday.
That number obviously did not include those of us who have refused to fly.
that number was a quote from the Airline Association in a comment about the recent snow storms effect on flights.
So we need to convince another 4 million, give or take, to quite being so docile.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #62
63. There are still a considerable number who actually don't mind
all the TSA shit - brainwashed into thinking it has something to do with security. I suspect as more and more people are subjected to the latest abuses, however, the numbers of people who decide it isn't worth the humiliation will grow and it will eventually start to affect the bottom line. One can hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
26. sure wish they would call them what they are Sexual Assualt and Molestation
calling torture enhanced interrogation makes it seem less criminal

How soon will those on the street who do sexual assault or molestation - call it 'just a pat down'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heywood J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
28. Unknown numbers = success?
How can unknown numbers possibly equal a success? This is also in the face of reports showing that 70% of test items get through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. Yeah, I noticed that, too. I guess that's an "unknown unknown," as it were...
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #28
73. Ask anyone from the * admin.
As you may recall, domestic wiretapping, etc. kept us safe by preventing an unknown number of terrorist attacks.

New boss, same as old boss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
29. With all that contraband where are the arrests?
Fuck. Al Qaeda says, "Boo!" and the US government shits it's pants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bongbong Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. No arrests
The "contraband" ends up in the pockets & homes of TSA employees. DUH!

("That's a nice pair of shoes in that luggage. Looks like my size, and they look new. SWWWEEETTTT")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
37. Napolitano sounds like a dictator, not a public servant
I really chafe when someone makes absolute comments like that. She's a damn coward, too afraid to have anything happen on her watch so she puts her career above everyone else's civil rights in case something happens and she gets questioned about it.

Does being treated in a fascist way by our government get called what it is yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #37
39. Too bad she isn't an elected official.
But then again, there are elected officials who should be thinking about what they are doing here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #39
40. She was appointed so she's still a public servant
But I guess since no one questions her then what she does is sanctioned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
42. And if we should ever meet, Ms. Napolitano, can I grope your breasts?
Just to be safe, of course...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sirthomas66 Donating Member (336 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #42
44. Disgusting thought....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #44
52. Of course, but it has to be done!
Our security is their priority! :crazy:

I suppose I wouldn't be so flippant if this story hadn't broke recently:

SFO pilot gives up gun after posting sensitive YouTube videos

or this one:

Man Accidentally Carries Loaded Gun Onto Plane; TSA Failure Rate May Approach 70%

Ms. Napolitano's comment that we should still be subjected to groping is disingenuous. It's all smoke-and-mirrors designed to make Michael "Shirtoff" and his investors at Rapiscan into multi-millionaires.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
somone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
46. Marijuana : Al Qaeda's weapon of choice
Idiotic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
47. How... "hopeful"
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
48. The TSA staff at the airports apparently sympathize more with the passengers than with Washington
I just got in to America last night, changing planes in Atlanta on the way to Charleston, SC.

At the transfer security check, there was a huge line, and the old-style metal detector alongside the new scanner.

The TSA sent EVERY passenger through the old-style metal detector, and not one person through the hated scanner.
And, although this may seem strange, not ONE evil incident occurred despite the scanner sitting there unused. I
get the impression that the TSA doesn't feel like singing the TSA Blues (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3LNxvG1qQM)
any more, either! (at least in Atlanta--either that or we got lucky)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
49. We'd be even safer if we did body cavity searches and then flew naked
Edited on Mon Dec-27-10 11:45 AM by high density
When can we look forward to that security theater, Janet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
50. Well, hell yes!
She doesn't have to be scanned or patted down. Why should she give a rat's ass wha happens to you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crikkett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
51. "wer pick up more contraband now" is exactly what this was all about
from the beginning. The change is that people are letting slip their real agendas. It's like they can't help it.

The underwear bomber was set up just like the other 'foiled' terror 'attacks' that the FBI set up all year long.

And OBTW the 'unmeasurable' amount of contraband is not unmeasurable. You can measure it by the freaking barrel.

But it simply won't be measured, because then someone would have to admit that the 'contraband' is bullshit - nailclippers, lighters, baby formula, hamburgers wrapped in foil.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #51
64. TSA found some baggies with pot.
Amazing success indeed.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
55. once they start these programs
they NEVER stop them. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
somone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
56. There are lucrative corporate board seats waiting for Napolitano
in recognition of services rendered
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
williesgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
60. This is BS and we're worried about the Repukes? No difference on this issue -
make money for corporations, the hell with our health and privacy. Fuck them all. I'll take the train next trip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harvey007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
61. Welcome to East Germany
This is where we are headed.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stasi
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoneOffShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #61
66. +1 - The Stasi are your friends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
65. the "successes" so far - they found POT - oooh ahhh...
They lost a lot of airline passengers. My brother now drives up to Va from Fla instead of flying. We take the train to see the inlaws in Seattle. We both used to LOVE flying, and took many short vacations (bro to Las Vegas, us to Maine and out west)
Now we don't fly unless a family emergency strikes. I know many others who say the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
67. Welcome to the Police State, folks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q3JR4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
72. Riiiiight.....
And what, pray tell, are we all going to do about it?

Oh, yeah. Same as we (Americans in general) always do.

Q3JR4.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
74. at least for now.....until the people get so freakin fed up
with this CRAP...ya just keep it up and show your Orwellian BS

because people know this is BS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
76. Jackboot TSA thugs will never catch a real terrorist
so they get their jollies by treating ordinary Americans like terrorists, and go home with a feeling that they 'did something'.

Napolitano is as bad as they are. The assclown needs to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
77. That's what you think.
They'll be sticking around about as long as you will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
78. Police state mentality
"What we know is that you can't measure the devices that we are deterring from going on a plane."

You can't measure the number of people who avoid airlines because they are sick and tired of being frisked and x-rayed, either.







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 04:56 AM
Response to Original message
81. She's the Decider. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 05:06 AM
Response to Original message
82. What do you want to bet
SHE doesn't have to go through this legalized groping?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC