Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Goldman’s Leaked Memo to Rich Investors Exposes Facebook’s Actual Earnings

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 04:31 PM
Original message
Goldman’s Leaked Memo to Rich Investors Exposes Facebook’s Actual Earnings
Source: New York Magazine

Well, now we know why Goldman Sachs was so reluctant to give its millionaire clients any concrete details about the Facebook deal (save that vague appetite-whetting pitch letter that could easily have been mistaken for an entreaty from a Nigerian prince). Leaked copies of a 101-page private placement memo Goldman hand delivered to hand-picked potential investors a little after lunchtime yesterday — probably as they were leaving the Grill Room — reveal closely guarded details about Facebook's actual earnings, its plans for an IPO, and the SEC's investigation of Goldman's attempt to value Facebook at $50 billion. According to the document, Facebook earned $355 million in net income in the first nine months of 2010. Net earnings were a crucial detail left out of another leak, now confirmed by the document, that Facebook earned $1.2 billion in revenue during that same time period. In case you're keeping track, that means that $50 billion valuation is roughly 142 times what they earned (during those nine months). But after looking at the memo, Ryan Jacob of the Jacob Internet Fund told Reuters, "It just shows you that these business can generate 30 percent to 40 percent, potentially, operating margins."

However, the six-page financial statement included in the memo is unaudited, and sources say it doesn't address how Facebook earns its revenue. From acai berry weight loss ads and blackmailing you for that private Four Loko + Me = <3 <3 <3 <3 album, obvs! The document also says Facebook plans to increase its number of shareholders above 500 this year, a threshold that would require it to start disclosing (audited) reams of financial data on executive compensation and profit and losses and its competition in advance of going public by April 2012.

According to the Journal, it wasn't just Goldman and its Russian buddy at Digital Sky Technologies that were interested in getting that $50 billion valuation. "People familiar with the matter have said Facebook sought a benchmark valuation from a leading investment bank in preparation for a potential initial public offering next year and was keen on a 'round-number' valuation of $50 billion." Yeah, the roundness was what they were worried about, not the teeteringly high sum.

Goldman's memo to investors also confirms speculation that the SEC is looking into the deal. Sources tell DealBook that they're investigating several issues, "including the structure of the deal and media reports about the offering, which was supposed to remain private." That's ridiculous. How could Goldman create a giant bubble out of Facebook frenzy if they kept the deal private?

Read more: http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2011/01/goldmans_leaked_details_on_fac.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. May the Leaking continue! Nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oceansaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. That is one of the things the market is supposed to do.
Price discovery. That of course depends on being honest. It seems that when you have a business where all the assets walk out the door and go home at the end of the day, you would try and be a bit honest. After all, you can keep your reputation even when the assets have gone home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. I love that a "hand-picked potential investor" leaked this. Will Holder go after him/her? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. For what? My question: Will Holder go after Goldman?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. It was a reference to him going after Assange. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. Hear's to leakiness!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smashcut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
6. B U B B L E
How is it legal for Goldman just to INVENT a number like $50 BILLION for valuation of a company that they KNOW earns not even 1/100th of that in a year?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Ebay had a P/E of over 10,000 back in the dot-com heyday.
GS apparently wants a new, very specific bubble.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. It's like inventing that 700 billion number in 2009. nt
Edited on Fri Jan-07-11 05:24 PM by valerief
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky Luciano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. It is based on buying 1% of the shares for $500MM.
Could still be cooked, but it is how the number gets invented. Facebook has been having increments based on various private transactions though that include DST, MSFT, and others. Based on all those private transactions is where the "valuation" comes from. It is probably a valuation inline with any ultra-fad stock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. Same way they invented the value of all their derivative trades for insurance purposes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. Did Goldman have anything to do with picking Time Man of the Year 2010?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidwparker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. It makes you wonder, huh?
Good point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
9. K&R
Everyone associated with this criminal enterprise should be in prison.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
12. This is proof that it is a Ponzi scheme designed to enrich...
Goldman Sachs and that jerk who created Facebook.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. Can a person get rid of their Facebook info?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. No.
Never post anything to the internet that you do not want recorded *forever*.

You can "request" removal, you can set data to "private", but once it's out there, you lose all control.

So, to repeat:
Never post anything to the internet that you do not want recorded *forever*.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Oh no! That picture of me at the Animal Lovers convention is still there?
She was a hot looking ewe, however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. I have 12 year old emails still floating about.
No hot animal pron, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrdmk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
16. What is that smell? It smells like bunch of electronics in the trash!
a.k.a. Dot Com bubble...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
22. Who can forget MySpace?
Facebook is another internet fad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC