Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Supreme Court Rejects Appeal by D.C. Marriage Equality Opponents

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 11:20 AM
Original message
Supreme Court Rejects Appeal by D.C. Marriage Equality Opponents
Source: Associated Press

Court rejects appeal over DC gay marriage law
(AP) – 1 hour ago

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court has rejected an appeal from opponents of same-sex marriage who want to overturn the District of Columbia's gay marriage law.

The court did not comment Tuesday in turning away a challenge from a Maryland pastor and others who are trying to get a measure on the ballot to allow Washingtonians to vote on a measure that defines marriage as between a man and a woman.

Bishop Harry Jackson led a lawsuit against the district's Board of Elections and Ethics after it refused to put that initiative on the ballot. The board ruled that the ballot question would in effect authorize discrimination.

Last year, Washington began issuing marriage licenses for same-sex couples and in 2009, it began recognizing gay marriages performed elsewhere.



Read more: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jVR6R4bAUGJabv66JKnT3eA5dyXg?docId=2df0ca4b9d22475c8ce576298255200d
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. k/r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. Okay, here's the next strategy,
We declare that all corporate personhoods are bisexually oriented. Oh, if we could make that stick, we would really confuse them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. Woot! Maryland next!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Hope you're right. I'm thrilled that Governor O'Malley was reelected, but he has to tread lightly.
I like him a lot. He's not a liberal, but he's been a fairly good governor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mahatmakanejeeves Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. Supreme Court refuses to revive effort to put DC same-sex marriage law to vote
Source: Washington Post

By Robert Barnes
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, January 18, 2011; 11:53 AM

The Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to revive a lawsuit intending to allow a voter referendum on the District's same-sex marriage law.

Local courts have said the District's Board of Elections and Ethics was justified in denying attempts by opponents of same-sex marriage to put the issue to a vote. Without comment, the justices said they would not review the latest decision upholding the board's decision by the D.C. Court of Appeals.

The board has contended that such a ballot initiative would, if approved, violate the city's Human Rights Act, which bans discrimination based on sexual orientation. A judge agreed, and the appeals court by a 5 to 4 vote upheld the ruling.

The challenge was led by Bishop Harry Jackson, a D.C. resident who is pastor of Hope Christian Church in Beltsville. He and other opponents, represented by a conservative legal group, said it should not be up to officials to decide when public initiatives are allowed.

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/18/AR2011011802214.html?hpid=topnews



Thanks to DCist for the tip.

Jackson's Gay Marriage Challenge Rejected By Supreme Court
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. wonder which of the righty justices refused to support it and why
Edited on Tue Jan-18-11 01:12 PM by rurallib
probably never hear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Wow. Those who live in DC are getting screwed every way they can get screwed.
Edited on Tue Jan-18-11 01:14 PM by BrklynLiberal
and not even getting dinner first...

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/18/opinion/18tue3.html?_r=1&ref=todayspaper

Taxation Without Representation, Indeed
Published: January 17, 2011

The long suffering, and underrepresented, taxpayers of the District of Columbia are properly worried about their shrinking role in the new Republican-controlled House. Tucked into the changes enacted by Speaker John Boehner is a rule depriving the district of its one bit of token voting power in Congress.

Washington’s 600,000 residents are allowed by law to elect only a watchful delegate. In 2007, the Democratic leadership allowed that delegate to cast some limited committee votes. Now even that has been killed by Republicans, leaving the delegate, Eleanor Holmes Norton, and the city fathers questioning whether they are heading back to the “plantation mentality” days when Congressional committees routinely undermined home rule.

The city came closer to democracy last year until a measure that would have given it a full voting representative was scuttled after the gun lobby attached noxious amendments gutting gun controls in the district. This has long been the fate of Congress’s host city under the pendulum swipes of politics. Democrats enacted limited voting powers for the delegate in 1993, but Republicans killed them two years later only to see them revived when Democrats reclaimed the gavel four years ago.

<snip>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swimboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
8. Great news
Thanks for posting it. Waiting to hear how the opponents of the outcome will attempt to seek redress through Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC