Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

An Iraq intifada

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-04 07:19 AM
Original message
An Iraq intifada
Edited on Mon Apr-12-04 07:20 AM by JoFerret
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1190300,00.html

Now the war is being fought in the open, by people defending their homes

Naomi Klein in Baghdad
Monday April 12, 2004
The Guardian

April 9, 2003 was the day Baghdad fell to US forces. One year later, it is rising up against them.
Donald Rumsfeld claims that the resistance is just a few "thugs, gangs and terrorists". This is dangerous wishful thinking. The war against the occupation is now being fought out in the open, by regular people defending their homes and neighbourhoods - an Iraqi intifada.

"They stole our playground," an eight-year-old boy in Sadr City told me this week, pointing at six tanks parked in a soccer field, next to a rusty jungle gym. The field is a precious bit of green in an area of Baghdad that is otherwise a swamp of raw sewage and uncollected rubbish.

Sadr City has seen little of Iraq's multibillion-dollar "reconstruction", which is partly why Moqtada al-Sadr and his Mahdi army have so much support here. Before the US occupation chief, Paul Bremer, provoked Sadr into an armed conflict by shutting down his newspaper and arresting and killing his deputies, the Mahdi army was not fighting coalition forces, it was doing their job for them.
<more>




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-04 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. "the Mahdi army was not fighting coalition forces, it was doing their job"
Telling words.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
54anickel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-04 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. Looks like it's becoming a religious crusade. From the article -
Whatever it is becoming, it is not "as advertised". Wish America would wake up to the fact that they've been had but the most corrupt, crooked corporate run misadministration in the history of this nation.

And I saw something that I feared more than any of this: a copy of the Koran with a bullet hole through it. It was lying in the ruins of what was Sadr's headquarters in Sadr City. On April 8, according to witnesses, two US tanks broke down the walls of the centre while two guided missiles pierced its roof, leaving giant craters in the floor and missile debris behind.

The worst damage, however, was done by hand. The clerics at the Sadr office say that US soldiers entered the building and crudely shredded photographs of Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, the top Shia cleric in Iraq. When I arrived at the destroyed centre, the floor was covered in torn religious texts, including several copies of the Koran that been ripped and shot through with bullets. And it did not escape the notice of the Shias here that hours earlier, US soldiers had bombed a Sunni mosque in Falluja.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelaque liberal Donating Member (981 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-04 07:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Imagine the reaction if it was a Christian church in US that was destroyed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
54anickel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-04 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I am a bit more disturbed about what our troops are doing there right
now. Destroying pictures of Sistani? Destroying copies of the Koran and other religious texts? Shooting bullets thru the Koran?
All this done in the office of Sadr.

Do you expect any Iraqi to believe that attack on the mosque was simply a miltary defensive move against terrorists and not a religiously motivated hate crime against Islam when followed by the above?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boomer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-04 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. And more telling words:
>>"We should thank Paul Bremer," Salih Ali told me. "He has finally united Iraq. Against him."<<

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-04 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. viceroy bremer had better...
double up on his mercenary protectors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
54anickel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-04 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
5. Stupid, stupid, stupid. How many posts were made to DU saying
silencing the newspaper was a stupid move.

snip>
Sadr City has seen little of Iraq's multibillion-dollar "reconstruction", which is partly why Moqtada al-Sadr and his Mahdi army have so much support here. Before the US occupation chief, Paul Bremer, provoked Sadr into an armed conflict by shutting down his newspaper and arresting and killing his deputies, the Mahdi army was not fighting coalition forces, it was doing their job for them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-04 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
8. The war-mongering profiteers are stupid, stupid, stupid.
But, they are probably gleeful since they may very well end up getting their additional world war. Too bad their *sses aren't placed directly in harms way, both in treausure and in blood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC