Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Osama info deleted from second memo

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
dutchdemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 03:55 AM
Original message
Osama info deleted from second memo
The unraveling continues


Osama info deleted from second memo
No mention made of possible al-Qaida activity

By AP


WASHINGTON -- A day after President George W. Bush received a pre-Sept. 11, 2001, briefing on Osama bin Laden's al-Qaida's effort to strike on U.S. soil, government executives received a similarly titled memo that excluded information about current threats and investigations, say federal officials. The Aug. 7, 2001 memo, known as the senior executive intelligence brief or SEIB, didn't mention the 70 FBI investigations into possible al-Qaida activity that Bush had been told of a day earlier in a memo entitled Bin Ladin Determined To Strike in US, the officials said yesterday.

The senior executives' memo also did not mention a threat received in May 2001 of a U.S.-based explosives attacks or say that the FBI had concerns about recent casing of buildings in New York, the officials told The Associated Press.

They spoke on condition of anonymity, because the senior executives' memo remains classified.

Some members of Congress said yesterday they were concerned that senior executive memos and other similar documents may have given policy-makers working for Bush an incomplete picture of the terror threat.

But administration officials said there was nothing sinister about the deletions, because the memos are destined for two different audiences.

The CIA uses different standards for the president's daily intelligence


more...

http://www.canoe.ca/NewsStand/CalgarySun/News/2004/04/13/418674.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
shockingelk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 04:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. Beautiful!
Someone needs to go on record ... "My version didn't have the new information about the current threats".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 05:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. and this means what re: bush's responsibility
is this a round about way of lowering the bar yet again for the boy wonder?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 05:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. This verifies Clarke statement that Osama 8/6/01 was not passed on
Sort of makes Condi and Bush a liar.

But that will not stop Bush from repeating the lie this evening.

Or stop the media from ignoring that what he says about doing all he could do pre-911 is a lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. he wouLd have moved mountains
of cocaine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
5. So the WH gave us the first and last page
Edited on Tue Apr-13-04 07:04 AM by DoYouEverWonder
what part did they give to the Sr. Executives? The middle 9 pages?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
booksenkatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 07:08 AM
Response to Original message
6. "Two different audiences"
Ah, yes, it's all just a show for Ringmaster Rove. Every decision made in this White House is grounded solely in politics and personal financial gain, not in the needs of the citizenry.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 07:34 AM
Response to Original message
7. The two memos had identical titles.
1. Did someone in the White House order the deletions?
2. Was Condi so adamant about the "historical" nature of the document, intending that they declassify only the Aug. 7 PDB?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC