Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Police discover hidden arsenal in Ciudad Juarez

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 09:44 PM
Original message
Police discover hidden arsenal in Ciudad Juarez
Source: AP

CIUDAD JUAREZ, Mexico (AP) — Mexican federal police said Saturday they discovered a basement arsenal hidden behind the mirrors of a home gym that included three anti-aircraft guns, dozens of grenades, a grenade launcher, AK-47s and other high-powered weapons.

The neatly ordered stockpile found in an upscale neighborhood in Ciudad Juarez, across the border from El Paso, Texas, also contained several makes of machine guns, rifles, a shotgun and more than 26,000 ammunition cartridges, according to Raul Avila Ibarra, the federal police commissioner in charge of the city.

Police say they discovered the weapons Friday while searching a house near the U.S.-Mexico border. Avila said the police acted on an anonymous tip that there were kidnapping victims in the house, but no one was found.

The mirrors of the gym opened at the touch of a button near the floor, allowing access to the secret shelter, which also held more than 50 military uniforms, as well as bulletproof vests and gas masks. Three money-counting machines were also found.

Read more: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hYrc7I0hrTO7nezVQncThbe7EK4A?docId=f0e4a75aa05e4e89bf86a3cfe9c70aa9
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
freshwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Anti-aircraft guns? They need to find out who owned these.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avant Guardian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Juarez cartel would be my guess
Mexico! The surf, the sand, the...severed heads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freshwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. That makes sense, but I'll bet the owner of the house isn't listed that way, LOL.
Edited on Sat Apr-30-11 10:31 PM by freshwest
This story could be spun so many ways, what a treasure trove:

More gun control, they're gonna kill us!

Less gun control, they're gonna kill us!

It's just Mexico, forget about it!

It's just Texas, forget about it!

Open the border, send our troops to put down the terrorists before they can cross the border!

Seal the border, put killer drones to stop them climbing the fence, or drop daisycutters to keep them from tunneling into our country!

It's the ATF's fault!

It's Chavez' fault!

And of course, we all know the classic:

It's all Obama's fault!

:hi:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Hint... they probably didn't come from the United States ...
unless our government supplied them to Mexico or to governments in Central America or South America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petronius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Are you sure? 'Cause I was at this gun show one time, and all the people were drunk and shooting
guns in the air, and they were wearing all this racist and nazi gear, and once they knew you were 'cool' they would totally sell you antiaircraft missiles, and machine guns, and anything you wanted out of the back of a truck. No grenades though, I had to buy those at WalMart.

Don't ask where this was 'cause I can't remember, but it totally happened. You should just take my word for it. Also, the NRA totally sucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. I remember that one! What a bunch of morans
and I agree the NRA totally sucks

yup

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petronius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Yeah, I remember you were there. I totally saw you steal that little girl's ice cream,
by the way, so don't be thinking you got away with it (although the way you squealed when she started chasing you was pretty funny)...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
friendly_iconoclast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-11 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. You are a bad, bad person.
Don't ever change, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tolucano Donating Member (57 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. Most of the arms the narco's are using
now are from south america and from our own mexican armies. They have full automatic rifles, grenadas, rocket launchers. We need to be more efficient on the southern border to guatamala.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 05:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. Squirrel hunters. Legitimate sporting use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. I was in Juarez in the late 70's. Worst place I've ever been, and that was then.
It must be hell now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nyy1998 Donating Member (984 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. I'm from El Paso, it wasn't the worst city to visit 5-10 years ago, but it is now
Take it from someone who's been to rural India. Juarez a few years ago was fairly decent compared to some areas I've visited. Of course now it's a complete shithole and no one here will visit it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. I meant in terms of vibes,
not poverty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nyy1998 Donating Member (984 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Even then, I'd still not say it was all that bad nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texano78704 Donating Member (215 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. I grew up in El Paso in the 60's and 70's
Went to Juarez quite often. It used to be a great place to shop. And for many of the soldiers from Ft Bliss, the place to party. Juarez was a border town then, but it has become a real nightmare for its citizens today.

The black market drug demand in the US is responsible for this mess. It's time to end prohibition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
9. Off Topic a little
I was there in about 2005.
While there I ran across a cemetery that I found very serene.
Most head stones were white or blue against the brown of the earth, I found it very spiritual
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iverglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
12. Imagine ...
If the USofA stops stonewalling efforts to achieve an arms trade treaty ...


http://www.un.org/disarmament/convarms/ArmsTradeTreaty/html/ATT-more.shtml
No global norms
Important areas of world trade are covered by rules that bind countries into agreed conduct. But they are not bound by rules when transfering weapons. An eclectic set of national and regional control measures on arms transfers exists, but the absence of such an international framework has unnecessarily obscured transparency and trust.


Can we hope for change?

http://www.state.gov/t/us/136849.htm
(no copyright issue)
Remarks
Ellen Tauscher
Under Secretary for Arms Control and International Security
Carnegie Endowment For International Peace
Washington, DC
February 18, 2010

... That is why we need to explore a legally binding measure to better control transfers across international borders.

For the Arms Trade Treaty to be effective at thwarting irresponsible transfers, it must ensure that members effectively implement national laws that criminalize such transfers and allow for the monitoring of commerce. Without this, it won’t necessarily deter or stop terrorism.

So-called “legally-binding instruments” are absolutely meaningless to such terrorists. They are criminals who don’t and won’t abide by any reasonable agreements.

This means that the most only effective way to inhibit their activity is indirectly.

All states must recognize the obligation to enact and enforce laws within their territory that criminalize, isolate, and punish those terrorist groups operating within their territory or profiting from transactions that originate in or transit through their territory.

And, if the state claiming sovereign jurisdiction does not have the capability for such enforcement, then the international community must make available the resources to create such capability, both in the short and long run.

This means that any international instrument hoping to make real impact on “illicit” arms transfers must focus on requiring each party to put in place those necessary means to eliminate such rogue non-state actors both from within their territory and on the receiving end of their international commerce.


http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=abkyS4.975YM
U.S. Backs Arms Trade Treaty at UN, Abandoning Bush Opposition
By Bill Varner - October 30, 2009 13:46 EDT

Oct. 30 (Bloomberg) -- The Obama administration voted today to support United Nations-sponsored talks on a treaty to regulate the $55 billion-a-year trade in conventional weapons, reversing prior U.S. opposition to negotiations begun in 2006.

The General Assembly, consisting of all 192 UN member governments, adopted a resolution setting out a timetable for talks during the next two years on the proposed Arms Trade Treaty, including a UN conference to produce a final accord in 2012. The vote was 153-1, with 19 abstentions.

“This is massive in its impact because the U.S. is the largest conventional arms trader in the world,” Brian Wood, disarmament expert for London-based Amnesty International, said in an interview. “The Obama administration has decided to enter into the negotiations and do the diplomatic heavy lifting.”

The U.S. trade in conventional weapons amounts to 40 percent of the global total, according to Wood. The resolution says the unregulated trade in conventional arms “can fuel instability, transnational organized crime and terrorism.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC