Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WikiLeaks: Osama bin Laden 'protected' by Pakistani security

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-11 11:16 AM
Original message
WikiLeaks: Osama bin Laden 'protected' by Pakistani security
Edited on Tue May-03-11 11:19 AM by kpete
Source: Telegraph UK

WikiLeaks: Osama bin Laden 'protected' by Pakistani security
Pakistani security forces allegedly helped Osama bin Laden evade American troops for almost 10 years, according to secret US government files.

By Tim Ross 5:31PM BST 02 May 2011

American diplomats were told that one of the key reasons why they had failed to find bin Laden was that Pakistan’s security services tipped him off whenever US troops approached.

Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence Directorate (ISID) also allegedly smuggled al-Qaeda terrorists through airport security to help them avoid capture and sent a unit into Afghanistan to fight alongside the Taliban.

The claims, made in leaked US government files obtained by Wikileaks, will add to questions over Pakistan’s capacity to fight al-Qaeda.

Last year, David Cameron caused a diplomatic furore when he told Pakistan that it could not “look both ways” on terrorism. The Pakistani government issued a strongly-worded rebuttal.

Read more: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/pakistan/8488236/WikiLeaks-Osama-bin-Laden-protected-by-Pakistani-security.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pauldp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-11 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's why we pay the ISI the big bucks.
close to 3B a year last I heard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corkhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-11 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. So Pakistan has its fundy nutjobs just like we do.
Pat Robertson and I are both Americans, but we have very different views on things. Why is it not the same of the Pakistanis?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-11 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. There is a difference ...
The entire military establishment in Pakistan believes terrorism is a fair and proper way of fighting against India and the US. It is NOT restricted to a few nutjobs but everyone from the Pakistani Army Chief down to NCOs believe this.

Osama was an ISI asset. Daniel Pearl was about to find out that Al Q'aeda and Taliban (along with Lashkar e Tayyaba and Jaish e Mohammad) were all SUBSIDIARIES of the ISI -- so he was killed.

If we force Pakistan to disband its military and the ISI, there will be peace in Afghanistan. Why does Pakistan need such a big military anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-11 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. "If we force Pakistan to disband its military"
Has that ever happened in any country short of occupation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-11 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. If we don't pay them money, Pakistan would be bankrupt in
a few months. There is no economy to speak of. The largest export is terrorism, paid for by American aid.

We have paid Pakistan >$128 billion since the 50's, mostly during Reagan and GW eras.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Well, If They Meant Pulling the Aid Money
to divert their military budget, that makes more sense. Still don't think it would amount to disbanding the military. There is a lot of conflict and internal unrest in that region. They have to have a military. And for all its double-dealing, the Pakistani military is needed to hold things together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-11 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. Just getting us ready for more war in Pakistan IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vehl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-11 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. The ISI wired 100000 to Mohammed Atta before the 9/11 attacks!


The Pakistan connection

There is evidence of foreign intelligence backing for the 9/11 hijackers. Why is the US government so keen to cover it up?


Michael Meacher
The Guardian, Thursday 22 July 2004 00.01 BST
Article history



Omar Sheikh, a British-born Islamist militant, is waiting to be hanged in Pakistan for a murder he almost certainly didn't commit - of the Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl in 2002. Both the US government and Pearl's wife have since acknowledged that Sheikh was not responsible. Yet the Pakistani government is refusing to try other suspects newly implicated in Pearl's kidnap and murder for fear the evidence they produce in court might acquit Sheikh and reveal too much.

Significantly, Sheikh is also the man who, on the instructions of General Mahmoud Ahmed, the then head of Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), wired $100,000 before the 9/11 attacks to Mohammed Atta, the lead hijacker. It is extraordinary that neither Ahmed nor Sheikh have been charged and brought to trial on this count. Why not?

Ahmed, the paymaster for the hijackers, was actually in Washington on 9/11, and had a series of pre-9/11 top-level meetings in the White House, the Pentagon, the national security council, and with George Tenet, then head of the CIA, and Marc Grossman, the under-secretary of state for political affairs. When Ahmed was exposed by the Wall Street Journal as having sent the money to the hijackers, he was forced to "retire" by President Pervez Musharraf. Why hasn't the US demanded that he be questioned and tried in court?


more here
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/jul/22/usa.september11


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. +10000 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vehl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Daniel Pearl was the reporter who found that info...guess what happened to him?
is it any surprise that "someone" kidnapped him and offed him while in Pakistan? especially when he was the one who found out that the ISI funded Mohammed Atta? Gee I wonder who would have wanted him dead!

now we find Osama in a former(lol @former) ISi safe house in the middle of Pakistan's West Point. It does not take a rocket scientist to put two and two together

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-11 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
7. I've been telling people that for years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-11 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. me too .... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 02:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC