Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Congress may defang consumer agency before first bite

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 07:54 PM
Original message
Congress may defang consumer agency before first bite
Source: msnbc.com

updated 5/18/2011 3:05:45 PM ET

Almost a year after Congress created a new federal agency to protect consumers from shady lending practices, there is a move afoot on Capitol Hill to clip its wings before it takes flight.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau was one of the most contentious provisions of the sweeping Dodd-Frank financial reform bill enacted in 2010. That 2,000-page legislation was designed to fix many of the regulatory loopholes that allowed big banks to take on too much risk. The aim was to prevent another financial collapse like the Panic of 2008 that produced a massive government bailout, sent the housing market into a tailspin and plunged the economy into a deep recession.

On Wednesday, the CFPB put its toe in the turbulent waters of regulating mortgage loan disclosures, one of the most common consumer credit complaints during the housing boom. The "Know Before You Owe" project will test two prototype forms designed to clearly spell out loan terms when a borrower applies for a mortgage. Over the next few months, the CFPB will test the new forms with consumers, lenders and mortgage brokers and take comments on its website.

"With a clear, simple form, consumers can better answer two basic questions: 'Can I afford this mortgage, and can I get a better deal somewhere else?'" Elizabeth Warren, the White House's special adviser in charge of setting up the CFPB, told reporters.

Read more: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43078110/ns/business-eye_on_the_economy/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. The last thing the republicans will allow is anything that interferes with their rigged setup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blackdem76 Donating Member (42 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. The rich guys who own Congress don't want scrutiny. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. Some in the Dem High Up's, don't like her either, though. Sad...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
plumbob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. Any politician of any party who opposes this commission or Warren
is, quite simply, a bought and paid for tool of the thieving financial sector bastards.

I wish for them their full measure of what they truly deserve. And quickly.

Makes me extremely happy that we have not used banks or any other financial institution of any kind since 1978.

Really, if a disease came and killed all the bankers, hedge fund operators and the whole rest of the casino, I would not shed a tear, and the country would be better for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. Predictable --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnyxCollie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Nonsystematic errors should not be predictable.
If government is "by the People, for the People...", then occurrences where government moves from that sentiment should be random, not expected.

There must then be an explanatory variable affecting the behavior which has not yet been identified.

Can you guess what it is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. How about corporatists seeking to bury Elizabeth Warren?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnyxCollie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. An accurate analysis.
What else can it be applied to? Let's test it.

Corporatists seeking to bury the public option.

Corporatists seeking to bury repeal of tax subsidies for oil and gas companies.

Corporatists seeking to bury restrictions on deep sea drilling.

Looks like a winner.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
6. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DirkGently Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
9. We cannot possibly have too much Elizabeth Warren here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lionessa Donating Member (842 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. You got that absolutely correct! She's certainly one of my heros.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
12. Pubs don't want no f'in' consumer protection agency f'in' with bidness
practices, no matter how reprehensible, no matter how fraudulent, no matter how deceitful, no matter how destructive for the bidness of America is bidness, free of any governmental regulation or oversight. :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC