Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Life span of U.S. nuclear weapons will increase under plan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 09:01 PM
Original message
Life span of U.S. nuclear weapons will increase under plan
Source: The Washington Post

A new, 10-year strategic plan for the U.S. nuclear weapons complex demonstrates that as the size of the arsenal shrinks because of a new arms control treaty with Russia, the effectiveness and life span of the United States’s weapons will increase.

Among the “select initiatives” listed by the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) in an update released Wednesday of its 2004 strategic plan are life-extension programs for two nuclear missile warheads and one type of bomb.

Life extension for the W-76, the most numerous nuclear warhead in the U.S. stockpile, was initially approved in 2000. At first only 800 were to be refurbished, but the Bush administration raised that number to 2,000; the number now being refurbished is classified. The program will not be completed until 2018, according to the plan.

An initiative listed for completion by 2017 is a study for extending the life by some 30 years of the B-61 nuclear bomb. Some current B-61 models are strategic and carried by B-52 and B-2 stealth bombers, and other versions are tactical, carried by U.S. and NATO fighter planes based in Eu6rope.

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/life-span-of-us-nuclear-weapons-will-increase-under-plan/2011/05/18/AFY0en6G_story.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
somone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Just give them a squirt of WD-40 every 10 years
and they'll last forever
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. I Hope They Don't Suffer from Embrittlement in the Trigger Mechanism or Something
Edited on Wed May-18-11 10:26 PM by AndyTiedye
It would suck if they started going off by themselves. :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 07:37 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. The refurbishing is to make sure they will 'go off' when required
There are so many safeties on US weapons, it's surprising they 'go off' at all.

In order for them to work as intended, a certain sequence of events must occur in the proper order and timing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Exactly.
The fail-safes are more susceptible to age than the basic weapons mechanisms, refurbishing them is done to make sure the weapon can still work as designed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. So 'accidents' are more likely as time goes on - good to know!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Other way around... unless you mean "doesn't explode" is an accident.
An earlier problem (I think these might be retired now) was discovered where a safety wire had to be removed before the weapon could detonate. Turns out years of handling, corrosion, etc made the wires break off inside the weapon, rendering it an incredibly expensive paperweight until the weapon was re-assembled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muskypundit Donating Member (417 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 01:38 AM
Response to Original message
3. "Effectiveness.... will increase"
God damn it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marasinghe Donating Member (754 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. isn't it, rather? reminded me of the Japanese Govt. ....
resetting the threshold for dangerous levels of radiation exposure, by simply issuing a new number out their asses; just so the nuke workers could continue to go into the power stations & try to defuse the situation. probably - though this is only my guess - to cover the power company from being liable for damages, due to illness or fatality, caused by exposures beyond the legitimate, scientifically-determined exposure levels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. "Eu6rope"
Jesus. No wonder print is dying so fast. They can't even spell-check.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC