Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House brushes off House Libya resolution, unlikely to send formal response to questions

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 04:28 PM
Original message
White House brushes off House Libya resolution, unlikely to send formal response to questions
Source: Associated Press

WASHINGTON — The White House brushed off congressional demands for a detailed report outlining U.S. objectives in Libya, a move likely to stoke further anger on Capitol Hill over President Barack Obama’s decision not to seek lawmakers’ consent for the military operation.

White House spokesman Jay Carney said Monday that administration officials were already answering questions about Libya in briefings on Capitol Hill. A House resolution calling on Obama to provide more detailed answers was “unhelpful,” Carney added, suggesting that the administration has no plans to formally respond within the 14-day window outlined in the measure.

However, the spokesman said the White House could continue to hold regular consultations with Congress on Libya.

“To the extent that within those consultations there are questions asked that we can answer, we will answer,” Carney said.

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/white-house-congress-has-right-to-ask-libya-questions-administration-obliged-to-answer/2011/06/06/AG5CGQKH_story.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
trud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. If I were a member of Congress
I think nothing Obama wanted would get done until he started abiding by the Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The problem is that Congress is bought and owned by the big corporations ...
because neither party represents us.

If the corporations tell Congress to jump, Congress asks how high.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orangeapple Donating Member (167 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. pardon me,
but WTF does that have to do with the President starting a war and suggesting that Congressional support is merely incidental?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Maybe the President would have never said that ...
if Congress wasn't bought and owned by the big corporations as he was.

The United States of the Corporation, by the Corporation and for the Corporation!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. your screen name is quite apt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Yup. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
7. Given our current constitutional atmosphere
This should qualify under the doctrine of "close enough" that allows the Executive to do whatever it wants. It has worked so well at Guantanamo and Bagram, and we actually saw most people applauding the doctrine in the execution of Osama bin Laden (and damn those Europeans for showing us up with Ratko Mladic). I don't know why Congress is all jazzed now about "close enough" when it comes to Libya.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. Well, la-di-da
By the UN Participation Act, the President may ONLY send troops to respond to a call-up after both houses of Congress authorize it.

By the War Powers Resolution, the President may only introduce armed forces into hostilities or areas where hostilities are to be expected pursuant to a declaration of war, Congressional authorization or if we're attacked.

That's it.

As a constitutional scholar, he should know better.

This man risks us all by defying US law.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JJW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
10. Clowns
Both Bushs' nominated clowns to the Supreme Court. Then Obama let Bush's political appointees remain at the DOJ. In other words, this nation is a free for all. Person with biggest guns and criminal friends, wins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 06:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC