Source:
The Washington PostOrganizers of an effort to repeal a Maryland law granting college tuition breaks to illegal immigrants have collected enough signatures to continue their push to put the issue to a statewide vote.
An ongoing tally posted Tuesday morning on the State Board of Elections Web site showed that 21,919 signatures had been validated, exceeding the 18,579 that were needed by the end of May for the petition drive to carry on.
Opponents of the new law have until June 30 to collect 55,736 valid signatures — or 3 percent of the number of votes cast in the last gubernatorial election. If they succeed, the new law will be put on hold and a statewide referendum will be held on the issue in November 2012.
(...)
The law, signed last month by Gov. Martin O’Malley (D) and set to go into effect July 1, would allow students who are illegal immigrants to pay the lower in-state rates at the state’s colleges and universities. To be eligible, students must have attended a Maryland high school for three years, provide proof that their parents are taxpayers and express their intent to become a citizen. As part of a compromise, the law directs undocumented students initially to community colleges. Those who receive an associate’s degree are then eligible to transfer and pay in-state tuition at a four-year institution.
Read more:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/politics/effort-to-repeal-maryland-tuition-law-advances/2011/06/07/AGlNlOLH_story.html
This law is similar to one that California passed back in 2001. Yesterday, the US Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal of the California Supreme Court case
Martinez v. Regents of the University of California that unsuccessfully challenged California's in state tuition provision, something not mentioned in this report. (The state court verdict was unanimous with a lineup consisting of mostly Republicans and only one Democrat, Carlos Moreno. Ming Chin, nominated by the
-championing Pete Wilson, wrote the opinion.)