AARP Has Not Changed Its Position on Social Security

Source: AARP

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
June 17, 2011
Contact: Media Relations
(202) 434-2560


AARP Has Not Changed Its Position on Social Security

Reaffirms that program must be strengthened to maintain critical benefits

WASHINGTON – AARP CEO A. Barry Rand offered the following statement in response to inaccurate media stories on the association’s policy on Social Security:

“Let me be clear – AARP is as committed as we’ve ever been to fighting to protect Social Security for today’s seniors and strengthening it for future generations. Contrary to the misleading characterization in a recent media story, AARP has not changed its position on Social Security.

“First, we are currently fighting some proposals in Washington to cut Social Security to reduce a deficit it did not cause. Social Security should not be used as a piggy bank to solve the nation’s deficit. Any changes to this lifeline program should happen in a separate, broader discussion and make retirement more secure for future generations, not less.

“Our focus has always been on the human impact of changes, not just the budget tables. Which is why, as we have done numerous times over the last several decades, AARP is engaging our volunteer Board to evaluate any proposed changes to Social Security to determine how each might – individually or in different combinations – impact the lives of current and future retirees given the constantly changing economic realities they face.

“Second, we have maintained for years – to our members, the media and elected officials – that long term solvency is key to protecting and strengthening Social Security for all generations, and we have urged elected officials in Washington to address the program’s long-term challenges in a way that’s fair for all generations.

“It has long been AARP’s policy that Social Security should be strengthened to provide adequate benefits and that it is sufficiently financed to ensure solvency with a stable trust fund for the next 75 years. It has also been a long held position that any changes would be phased in slowly, over time, and would not affect any current or near term beneficiaries.

“AARP strongly opposed a privatization plan in 2005, and continues to oppose this approach, because it would eliminate the guarantee that Social Security provides and reduce benefits, and we are currently fighting proposals to cut Social Security to pay the nation’s bills.

“Social Security is a critically important issue for our members, their families and Americans of all ages, especially at a time when many will have less retirement security than previous generations with fewer pensions, less savings and rising health care costs. And, as we have been for decades, we will continue to protect this bedrock of lifetime financial security for all generations of Americans.”

For more information, visit www.aarp.org.

About AARP
AARP is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization with a membership that helps people 50+ have independence, choice and control in ways that are beneficial and affordable to them and society as a whole. AARP does not endorse candidates for public office or make contributions to either political campaigns or candidates. We produce AARP The Magazine, the definitive voice for 50+ Americans and the world's largest-circulation magazine with over 35.1 million readers; AARP Bulletin, the go-to news source for AARP's millions of members and Americans 50+; AARP VIVA, the only bilingual U.S. publication dedicated exclusively to the 50+ Hispanic community; and our website, AARP.org. AARP Foundation is an affiliated charity that provides security, protection, and empowerment to older persons in need with support from thousands of volunteers, donors, and sponsors. We have staffed offices in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.



Read more: http://www.aarp.org/about-aarp/press-center/info-06-2011/aarp-has-not-changed-its-position-on-social-security.html

Something to the effect that AARP was now willing to support the GOP's recommendations for Social Security.

I'm guessing they got a lot of irate calls from retirees today!

That was covered in the other LBN thread on this story.

The easiest solution, the only thing necessary to insure solvency, and nada.

make rich people richer?

I forgot what was of the greatest importance!

:blush:

I keep repeating that line over and over here, like a seven-year-old, but I actually don't think it can be hammered home often enough. We live for the very wealthy. That's exactly how they see us. Why would we want to protect them or fight their wars? They despise us.

I *thought* the story sounded fishy, when my mother heard it this morning. Especially when AARP had just released a pro-SS TV commercial.

Thanks for posting this much-needed info.

"It has also been a long held position that any changes would be phased in slowly, over time, and would not affect any current or near term beneficiaries."

Ask your lawyer what that means. It means NOTHING. "Current or near-term beneficiaries." How "near-term?" Sounds like people like me, at 52, are fucked. Paid into the system my whole life, now...oops. Sorry.

.

Neither did Ryan's plan.

Weasel words indeed!

Okay, so it won't help you, but it will do wonders for my retirement program!

.

I want a younger, more progressive version of it. Boomer numbers are behind us. We could be an awesome lobbying force.

Not here in the USSA.

And there's ZERO reason to cut Social Security to keep it solvent: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x931203

make Egypt look like a Sunday picnic.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jtGO39pJPTvMPI3DnXidRXK6207g?docId=b380f754d39f4024935b674e47104a3b


Sen. Bernie Sanders, a liberal independent from Vermont, said he was bothered by AARP's position but not surprised. "AARP is a fairly conservative seniors' organization," Sanders said.

"AARP is losing the confidence of seniors around the country, and not just seniors but people of every age group," said Max Richtman, acting CEO of the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare. "I hope the ship that he wants to be steer isn't the Titanic filled with seniors."

I understand that they floated the position that raising the age at which you receive benefits was on the table. Nothing in their statement refutes that.

Advocacy for seniors is the only legitimate reason for its existence.

This word soup sandwich says nothing valuable.