Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Unemployment Insurance Weekly Claims Report (07/07/2011)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
mahatmakanejeeves Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 07:48 AM
Original message
Unemployment Insurance Weekly Claims Report (07/07/2011)
Source: Employment and Training Administration, Department of Labor

UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE WEEKLY CLAIMS REPORT

Special Factor: Minnesota has indicated that approximately 2,500 of their reported initial claims are a result of state employees filing due to the state government shutdown.

SEASONALLY ADJUSTED DATA

In the week ending July 2, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 418,000, a decrease of 14,000 from the previous week's revised figure of 432,000. The 4-week moving average was 424,750, a decrease of 3,000 from the previous week's revised average of 427,750.

The advance seasonally adjusted insured unemployment rate was 2.9 percent for the week ending June 25, a decrease of 0.1 percentage point from the prior week's revised rate of 3.0 percent.

The advance number for seasonally adjusted insured unemployment during the week ending June 25 was 3,681,000, a decrease of 43,000 from the preceding week's revised level of 3,724,000. The 4-week moving average was 3,705,250, a decrease of 3,750 from the preceding week's revised average of 3,709,000.

Read more: http://www.dol.gov/opa/media/press/eta/ui/eta20111014.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. A lot of blah, blah, blah.
Bottom line, we are still screwed.

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Don't underestimate the level of "screwed" possible
Holding steady and trending to the good are both welcome. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Well, let's just hope that it keeps improving.
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nyy1998 Donating Member (984 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. It dropped in spite of Minnesota's situation, a good sign, but not popping champagne corks yet nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
humbled_opinion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. What?
Champagne corks... LOL.... Obama spends nearly a trillion dollars on stimulus, result $280K per job, sorry but I must have missed out on that money, it could have kept me employed for the next 8 years.... Where's mine?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nyy1998 Donating Member (984 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. $787 billion is nearly a trillion? Apparently math isn't your strong suit
Edited on Thu Jul-07-11 10:47 AM by nyy1998
And you miss my point completely. I'm not saying the numbers are good, they're not, but they're improving and that's something that hopefully turns into a solid trend. It's like you read "champagne corks" and start ripping me for celebrating. :eyes:

And you get your $280k from the WEEKLY STANDARD, which is flawed based on this:
http://www.tnr.com/blog/jonathan-chait/91390/counting-jobs

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
humbled_opinion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. What we don't pay any interest on the money?
Of course its a trillion more if we are being brutally honest and yes I do agree that the money did buy material goods not just labor so you get a point for that.... but.... the bottom line is and I think you won't disagree, that the private sector failed to live up to their part of the bargain, government doesn't make or sell a product it takes tax money and invests so that the private sector will come along and take over but in this case it just didn't work out that way...

Hope, I had Hope in 2008, I lost hope by 2010, ATM, I live with a very cynical view of American politics and it certainly won't be Obama that wins me back.....

Where are our convictions, our principles our holding our own representatives accountable? It seems, I am watching a the train wreck of the Democratic party in slow motion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
placton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. more lucky ducks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC