Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Murdoch's world in crisis

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
oioioi Donating Member (320 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 09:17 PM
Original message
Murdoch's world in crisis
Source: The Age (Melbourne)

Financial damage from the scandal has spilled over from the Sunday tabloid and analysts say the company's entire British newspaper group is at risk.
...
Up to 4000 people had been targeted for hacking by the paper's former private investigator, Glenn Mulcaire, police said. They are also investigating documents indicating the paper spent £100,000 in payments to five police officers



Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/world/murdochs-world-in-crisis-20110708-1h75v.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Murdoch just keeps Breaking the rules
over and over again

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. He can end up living with the dingoes for all I care...
and I mean that sincerely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberalynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Come on now Mate?
Edited on Fri Jul-08-11 10:21 PM by Liberalynn
What did the poor dingos ever do to you? :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. Eaten by dingoes maybe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberalynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 06:30 AM
Response to Reply #16
25. I am sure at the very least he'd leave a bad taste in their mouth
Edited on Sat Jul-09-11 06:31 AM by Liberalynn
or at the worst make them die of food poisoning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomThom Donating Member (752 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #16
26. They would spit him out
Edited on Sat Jul-09-11 07:53 AM by ThomThom
bad taste in their mouths
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tunkamerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. dingos?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
22. What have you got against the poor dingoes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. Maybe Murdoch can star in a special edition of "Cops" - When they gonna come for you, bad boy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. Fox called the election in 2000.
That's what I'm remembering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoutherDem Donating Member (317 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Could this reach his precious FOX?
I would guess his American News Empire is engaging in the same tactics as his British Empire. Now, the question is will someone find the proof?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Would our DOJ prosecute if it did?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Bhwwwaaahahaaahaaaa!!!!!
Good one! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberalynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Santa and the Easter Bunny are Real?
They'll probably elect him to congress here or give him a Supreme Court Justice seat, or appoint him to the President's cabinet. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NBachers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. How about the Eternal Meddle of Freedom or whatever it's called
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberalynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 06:26 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. That too.
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldhippydude Donating Member (446 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. funny thing
i am old enough to remember other scandals... notably Watergate, this Murdock thing kind of reminds of that... Nixon won in 72 by a landslide (i worked for the Dem's that year), and this was after catching the watergate burglars... at the time they were trying do dismiss it as a "3rd rate burglary attempt".. but the scandal drip, drip, dripped ever widening..

late in 73 when Nixon Fired the independent prosecutor (Archibald Cox), the nature of the scandal changed one ultimately Nixon could not survive... this series of events in Britain, may very well be the "Saturday Night Massacre" moment for news corp. et el...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberalynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. My only question is who in this country has the guts to take him on?
Edited on Fri Jul-08-11 10:49 PM by Liberalynn
He owns most of the press and the majority of the remainder is owned by other sympathetic neocons. Our government sure isn't about to do it. Half of them are "in bed with" Murdoch and the rest are too afraid that Bill ORielly might call them "pinheads."

Back during the Watergate era we still had an independent press and at least a semblance of a legitimate two party system.

I don't ever see him being brought to justice here even if a smoking gun was hand delivered to the Justice Department.

I think IMHO we are going to have to depend on the Brits and just pray like hell they don't drop the ball.

GOD SAVE THE QUEEN!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fedsron2us Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #13
28. There is big money at stake here.
If the Murdoch empire goes down there are others that will profit from its fall.

I don't expect he will be shown much mercy by his fellow media sharks once there is blood in the water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberalynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #28
35. Sure hope you are right
I would love to see him taken down and all his cohorts with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJCher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
36. I look forward to this with great relish
i am old enough to remember other scandals... notably Watergate,

I remember that, too, and although I was very young, I was still old enough to wonder what was it going to take to get rid of Nixon.


I like your reminder that they are so often their own undoing. It need not be a new move or action Murdoch takes; in fact, it will probably be something Murdoch set in motion some time ago that will lead to his spectacular crash.


Cher
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberalynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. This is the brightest news in some of the bleakest of times
Edited on Fri Jul-08-11 10:20 PM by Liberalynn
a tiny shining ray of hope, one that I only wish will get lighter and brighter.

Not to mix metaphors or get hopes up to high but I'd love for the whole stack of cards to just start tumbling down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
14. Apparently the Murdoch business model was to put the screws to their
managers to produce, produce, produce.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
15. One can only hope! What's bad for him might be good for all the rest of us.
I'd DEARLY LOVE to see that bastard get his comeuppance.

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
17. Too bad, murdick
If you were the government, it would have been legal!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
20. GREAT -- Maybe we can we count on elites destroying themselves ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
21. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
fedsron2us Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #21
30. This is certainly how Murdochs UK operations seem to have worked
It was the threat of personal attack by the NI tabloids like the NOTW that intimidated a whole generation of British politicians and was the reason the current government was expected to wave through the NewsCorp takeover of the hugely profitable BSkyB without referral to the Monopolies and Mergers regulator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Violet_Crumble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
23. I don't think it is in crisis yet. He's done some cynical damage-control and that's all...
He's protecting Rebekah Brooks, and she's every bit responsible for what happened as those directly involved. He closed down News of the World, which at first glance is a big move, but then I read this from the article: 'The closure of the paper was greeted by politicians and phone-hack victims as a cynical ploy to protect Mr Murdoch's bid for satellite broadcaster BSkyB'. I doubt he feels the slightest bit of revulsion over what was done by News of the World, and all he's interested in is making a bigger profit. I wish it would lead to a collapse of his media empire, but I suspect it won't...

Anyway, one thing to thanks News of the World for was inspiring an awesome song by the Jam...adios News of the World...

News of the World - The Jam
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T_i_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #23
27. Rebekah Brooks was directly involved herself
And yet she stays in her job (offered her resignation but was refused) whilst innocent NotW workers who had nothing to do with the hacking get laid off. It is a strange form of justice Murdoch offers, where the innocent are punished and the guilty go free.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Safetykitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #23
29. Agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fedsron2us Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #23
31.  I think it is a game changer for Murdoch in the UK
Edited on Sat Jul-09-11 08:52 AM by fedsron2us
As mentioned above illegal wiretaps, bugging, hacking, bribing police officers were not just a means of unearthing some juicy tabloid stories but part of the corporations modus operandi for intimidating opponents, gaining political influence and advancing Murdochs business interests. In fact the activity looks not dissimilar from old fashioned racketeering. Putting a stop to these activities would not just be inconvenient to Murdoch it would undermine his entire business model in the UK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #23
33. I don't know...stories are spinning out so quick - it has gotten hard to control.
Rupert has moved the internal cleanup work to New York under Joel Kline (yes, *that* Joel Kline). Rupert has just flown to the UK to try to address the issue and keep NewsIntl efforts to take full control of BSkyB (biggest broadcaster in UK, I believe) - and while earlier this week that was still nodded on as full steam ahead... it is now announced a slow down in the decision pending current investigations.

PM Cameron who hired (now arrested and out on bail) former top editor Coulson as his spokesman gave a pretty harsh speech to cover his butt, in which signaled (new) independence including that the investigation should go as high as it needs to go.

The Church of England has sent Murdoch a scathing letter that in essence threatens that official holdings may be divested (not so big on its face, however would likely lead to a rash of individual investors following suit) - and this is not just of News International (Murdoch's UK empire) but of NewsCorp (the big enchilada).

Requests to extend the investigations have been made to cross borders into Scotland (yesterday) and into Ireland (today.)

Oh yea, and the issues now are about police bribery, deletion of millions of email (big coverup), and corruption of power in the sense of political figures starting to talk out about the fear (per political words and actions) based on the brutal media response controlled by the Murdoch machine.

I am sure there is a whole lot more that I have missed on the most recent recap. It is one of those points in time where a scandal that starts as one thing and moves exceptionally slowly - suddenly explodes into a vast number of pieces all moving so fast that even the most powerful and corrupt organization can not control it all.

Given the undue influence on political discourse in this country due to the vast amounts of money and noise time given through the murdoch machine to radical right propaganda - this unraveling is quite a story to follow at the moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
32. Too big a problem
for the world to NOT make it fail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Cannon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
34. The day this Grandmaster of Douchery suffers one iota of consequence...
for any of his actions will be the day I boil and eat my underwear with a side of fava beans and a nice Chianti.

As usual, this will be found to be the work of "a few bad apples", who will all be rewarded handsomely for taking the fall and getting their hands slapped so that the rest of us can all "move on".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
37. Internet Fox apologists in a state of panic!
Now on a search for bad news about Olbermann or MSNBC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC