Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Boehner abandons efforts to reach comprehensive debt-reduction deal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 07:32 PM
Original message
Boehner abandons efforts to reach comprehensive debt-reduction deal
Source: Washington Post

By Paul Kane, Updated: Saturday, July 9, 8:00 PM
House Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) abandoned efforts Saturday night to reach a comprehesive debt-reduction deal, telling President Obama that a mid-size package was the only politically possible alternative to avoid a first-ever default on the nation’s mounting national debt.

After speaking with Obama -- who is hosting a key meeting Sunday evening on steps forward on the debt issue -- Boehner issued the following statement:
"Despite good-faith efforts to find common ground, the White House will not pursue a bigger debt reduction agreement without tax hikes. I believe the best approach may be to focus on producing a smaller measure, based on the cuts identified in the Biden-led negotiations, that still meets our call for spending reforms and cuts greater than the amount of any debt limit increase.”

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/2011/07/09/gIQARUJ55H_story.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Translation:
"We'll accept steep cuts to SS, Medicare, and Medicaid now so we can protect the tax cuts for the wealthy."

Obama: "We got a deal!"

:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Boner is an asshole.
Surely, that means Obama sucks...or something.

Goodness. Find a new hate-toy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. He's saying he'll accept the cuts already agreed to
Do you have another explanation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 02:46 AM
Response to Reply #10
58. I didn't see that in the article. Please tell me he isn't saying that.
Please.

Seriously, please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evasporque Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 05:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
62. "my way or highway" GOP non-compromise....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. So when is Boner arrested as a terrorist? /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. when will the man with the Bully Pulpit answer this bully shit?
That would be a good first step.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. OBAMA'S A TRAITOR! IMPEACH!
Er, I mean, what?

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
86. Remember when we all thought he had balls? nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #86
88. I still do
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #88
99. I hope you turn out to be right and not me. Really I do. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. Pic:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Notice how the two guys on the right
Look like Keith and Big Ed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
27. They do!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. There you go again boner telling lies
Show us the facts that prove tax cuts create jobs........ it should be easy because you have been saying that for ten years


I called my republican rep the other day and talked to one of his aides and said that it is the republican mantra that tax cuts are good for this country. I told her to send me the facts to prove this point and I work for tax cuts. If the rep and her could provide these facts then he needed to change his position or else he was just a liar and had no business in congress. Still waiting.........

We all need to call our reps and make them prove their positions and do not let up...........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejbr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
34. +1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
8. just another attempt to push obama even further to the right. been working so far lol nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NCarolinawoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. Maybe Repubs wanted to bait Obama into putting Social Security on the table
to neutralize the Ryan issue?

One of the largest newspapers here in NC had this headline on Friday: OBAMA ALARMS DEMS, AARP. On The Table: SOCIAL SECURITY.

That headline, alone, has already done damage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 02:54 AM
Response to Reply #23
59. Well, they succeeded. And you're right: the damage is done, but
more to Social Security and Medicare than to anyone or anything else.

Even if Republicans gain control of Congress and the WH and then cut them, their refrain will be, even Democratic President Obama realized cuts were necessary and stood ready to cut them.

BTW, when Obama supposedly traded extending tax cuts for those making over $250K, I believed Obama and his rightist financial team wanted that extension. And, I believe they want these cuts. Hence, Obama took the 14th amendment "off the table" ust as a hard core Republican was saying the Constitution might require raising the debt ceiling.

And Pelosi, claiming that changing the COLA would not be cutting benefits.

President Herbert Clark Hoover, vindicated at last. Didn't even take a full century.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
11. Good. SS stays off the table. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HankyDubs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #11
37. i had the same thought
hopefully you're right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 02:32 AM
Response to Reply #11
56. The article does not say that. Besides, everything should be off the table.
Edited on Sun Jul-10-11 02:59 AM by No Elephants
Republicans are recognizing a 1935 Supreme Court case forbids them to back off from the obligations that the U.S. has incurred pursuant to legislation passed by Congress.

Besides, they were going to raise the debt ceiling anyway. Public opinion and the consequences of not raising it were against them---and they knew it. When challenged by interviewers, they've been saying they would raise it, but August 2 (or whatever the date is) is not a "real deadline."

If Obama gives them anything for raising them the debt ceiling, it will be a giveaway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MinneapolisMatt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
12. Obama should walk away now
and let the repubs deal with whatever fall-out they create.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #12
33. I wish he would but have no hope he will. He should not negotiate with terrorists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #12
44. AOL headline just now: “Boehner rejects $4 Trillion dollar debt reduction deal”
ha ha

that might be the fallout the GOP gets from this. Dems get to say "We would have done more to balance the budget but the GOP would not!"

The $2 trillion in cuts agreed to will be some of those accounting things, office of this or that scales back in 2015 blah blah. I don't think it will be harmful to the economy (fingers crossed) or much else.

If we could do something for jobs between now and Nov. 2012 we can fix all this shit then.

We need to have a few more Sharon Angles and the witch from RI so the GOP either starts losing big.

Wonder what Fox will do with this? Will they let the Tea Party control the dialogue or the "adults"?

ha ha

They blinked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crowman1979 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #44
49. I'm glad the rethugs decided to let a drunk get behind the wheel of their congressional automobile.
Not only is he blinking, but he's swerving all over the damn place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Big Vetolski Donating Member (436 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #49
97. Boner's not drunk. Far worse than that. He's texting. At least a
Edited on Sun Jul-10-11 01:28 PM by The Big Vetolski
drunk would have half a chance of keeping his eyes on the road.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIdaho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #12
52. Best idea yet!
Since Boner agrees with the solution Vice President Biden orchestrated, let Joe close the deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 02:37 AM
Response to Reply #52
57. Two trillion in cuts in exchange for something the Rethugs will do anyway
Edited on Sun Jul-10-11 02:44 AM by No Elephants
would be a massive gift, not a "deal."

If Obama agrees to it, someone should make him put an (R) after his name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ragnarok Donating Member (133 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
13. Everyone hates each other these days...
...so I'm not sure why we expect either side to negotiate. If you truly believe someone to be the enemy, the one who you believe wishes you to die, to cease to draw a free breath, then you never compromise. Period. These elected officials are doing exactly what we've demanded of them - screaming louder, taking no shit, giving no credit, sharing no space with "the enemy". We hired them. We get the government we deserve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
14. how about you just vote on the debt ceiling by itself and then worry about the other shit later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HankyDubs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #14
38. hahahahaha
but then there is no gun to anyone's head. Can't do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DallasNE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #14
47. They Had That Vote In The House Already
And it failed by a wide margin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 03:01 AM
Response to Reply #47
60. That was before they began admitting the 14th amendment "might"
require them to raise the debt ceiling. Supreme Court said very clearly in 1935 that it does. But no sooner did they start saying that than Obama said the 14th amendment was off the table. WTF?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #60
94. The Supreme Court didn't say anything about the debt ceiling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #60
98. The only thing I can think...
is Obama isn't going to do anything regarding the 14th Amendment the Republicans will see as "cram down."

Of course, there are Republicans who think anything short of allowing the government to default on its debt (thereby triggering the worst financial crisis the world has ever seen, which the teabaggers will immediately blame on Obama) is cram down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
15. Time. Two years past time for Obama to address the people and call out the GOP for what they are...
Edited on Sat Jul-09-11 08:06 PM by onehandle
ANTI-AMERICAN!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
16. A mid size deal where the rich get everything
And that's his final offer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
17. Well at least there will be no cuts in Medicare or Social Security...
Bohner is a weasel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. You sure?
"I believe the best approach may be to focus on producing a smaller measure, based on the cuts identified in the Biden-led negotiations, that still meets our call for spending reforms and cuts greater than the amount of any debt limit increase.”
- Boehner


We dont know WHAT the cuts already proposed are.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. No, we don't, but the Social Security/Medicare cuts were discussed...
in context of the bigger deal.

Someone may still try to put them there, which will trigger my own personal nuclear option.

Personally, at this point I prefer republcians to refuse to negotiate and for Obama to use the "Constitutional Option" and just contine paying off the debts. it may be that the Republican Leadership prefers that too. They don't have to try and push through a Bill that will rip the party apart.

I think Boehner backed away from the bigger deal because he could not get the votes from Republicans and Pelosi was not going to help him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. I prefer republcians to refuse to negotiate and for Obama to use the "Constitutional Option"
I agree, that would break the cycle of deficit blackmail the GOP is setting up with this gambit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #24
95. There is no "constitutional option."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #19
93. Exactly right
A mid-sized deal only gets us to right after the election, and Boner is betting that he'll hold an even stronger hand by January, 2013. This deal will depress employment even further when the cuts are implemented, and the reich-wing will have something that even the starry-eyed economists (who declared a 'recovery') will call a double-dip.

That gets the independents all scared, and fear is how Republicons motivate voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
18. Looks like Andrew Leonard and Ezra Klein had it right. There was never a serious debt deal.
Edited on Sat Jul-09-11 08:15 PM by mzmolly
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=433&topic_id=703799&mesg_id=703799

"It's hard to know what to make of today's round of debt-ceiling negotiations. My instinct is to write them off as theatre. We're likely seeing the White House make a show of their interest in a compromise even though there's no compromise on the table. That fits with their general plan here: if the debt ceiling is going to cave in, they're going to make sure it does so on the Republicans. And the best way to get Democrats out of the way is to show that they did everything possible to make a deal while Republicans elevated the repetition of the word "no" into something approaching performance art."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
20. So he's saying Obama wouldn't agree to colossal cuts without a tax hike
Edited on Sat Jul-09-11 08:08 PM by starroute
But out the generosity of his heart, Boehner will agree to a deal that involves merely humongous tax cuts without a tax hike.

In other words, the GOP is willing to blow up the world in order to prevent any tax hikes on billionaires.

Interesting thing to make non-negotiable.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Thats how I see this too
He wants the cuts without the tax increases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blasphemer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #20
32. Spot on.
Whether it's 2 trillion or 4 trillion, tax hikes should be on the table. But, oh no, we can't have people who have benefited for far too long from a lopsided tax code paying their fair share. It never ceases to amaze me:

Republicans: No, No, No, NO, Hell NO!
Democrats: No.... no.... well, no, but.... hmmmm, maybe...... Ok (sigh)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blackbart99 Donating Member (421 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 04:47 AM
Response to Reply #32
61. If they blow it all up the rich won't suffer....
They'll just go vacation to the islands and wait for the smoke to clear on the wreckage that once
was our beautiful country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #61
92. Agreed
Maybe a few of the well-off got caught a bit flat-footed when the 2008 recession/depression started, but I'm willing to bet that the vast majority of them have taken the steps needed to ride out an economic disaster from a shutdown. All they have to do is wait until January, 2013, and they'll be able to get back into the game again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HillWilliam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
25. Little Boehner can't achieve large package n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #25
63. LMAOROTF - So True it hurts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
26. Once again, it is the GOP that is doing all it can to make PO look bad...
but the reality of the situation is, the GOP has done everything they could think of to block any progress.

This is one of the most perfect cases of political suicide I've ever seen. Even R's are ticked off at Boehner and his minions from hell. This may well be the last GOP congresscritters ever elected, and they will be torched in 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaybeat Donating Member (729 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Sounds like he's following Newt's playbook from 1993.
Stupid fuck.

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. Truer words were never spoken! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
29. The Boehner gets smaller
Boehner pushes smaller debt-reduction deal -- CNN headline on google
http://www.cnn.com/2011/POLITICS/07/09/debt.talks/index.html?eref=mrss_igoogle_cnn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DallasNE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
31. What "Tax Hikes"
He expects people to read that as tax (rate) hikes, which were not on the table.

Here Boehner is calling the end to current tax loopholes as a tax hike. In some cases we are not even talking about taxes at all. Credits that are used to offset income are not tax revenue at all. Rather they are a tax expense. They should count as cutting spending rather than as a tax hike because no tax was paid in the first place and it truly does reduce spending. Just because something is embedded in the tax code does not mean they are taxes -- as is the case here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneMadVoter Donating Member (17 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
35. Too bad we couldn't drop him and Cantor off in Pakistan on an Airlift
:dem: :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cereal Kyller Donating Member (400 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
36. Good!
Now, if Obama has ANY common sense at all, he will make it his mission in life to hang the albatross of the coming default around the GOP's neck!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joey Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
39. Boner is a Nazi. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
placton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
40. what's this? Obama was ready to shit on SS and Medicare/aid?
but his loyal followers doubted this! Oh my, how can it be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
41. When do Bush's tax cuts expire? (I know I should remember, but I don't)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DallasNE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #41
48. 12/31/2012
So this Congress will either let them expire or try to pass over an Obama veto.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #48
54. Bush tax cuts expired December 2010. Maybe you're thinking of the Obama tax cuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DallasNE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #54
83. No
The Bush tax cuts were extended for two years. Added to that was the Obama one year tax holiday that cut the Social Security tax rate by 2% for employees. Perhaps that is what you are thinking of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 02:12 AM
Response to Reply #41
53. December, 2010.
Edited on Sun Jul-10-11 02:13 AM by No Elephants
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DallasNE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #53
84. Stop The Misinformation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
42. Boner is such a cry baby
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
43. Scumbag
The GOP has been screaming for the past year about just how dangerous the federal debt is. "It's going to make Jesus cry, punch you in the kidneys, and eat your grandchildren!"

Oh, but apparently it's not so urgent to do something about fixing it.

God, those bastards piss me off!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr Noodlebrain Donating Member (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
45. The 14th amendment calls this whole conversation a scam on the American people. We are not required
Edited on Sat Jul-09-11 11:17 PM by Mr Noodlebrain
to cut our budget nor our important programs for social safety
nets.  These people (both Obama and Boehner) are stressing out
the American people with this scam.  The 14th amendment says
the government can never go bankrupt or not pay its debts.. so
stop already with the lies you guys. Do your job. Pay the
bills and make sure the poor and the middle class get what
they need.  stop the monkey business you monkies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #45
96. The 14th only says the government can't repudiate debts

Which means they can't suddenly say they don't owe money anymore. Nobody is discussing doing that.

The 14th says nothing about paying debts late or what to do if Congress doesn't authorize the money to pay them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
46. How about a comprehensive war-reduction deal??
Everything else would kind of fall into place. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LetTimmySmoke Donating Member (970 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
50. The Republican party is facing disaster.
This is the consequence of 10 years of purges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cstanleytech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
51. Good Faith from Boehner
thats rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 02:22 AM
Response to Original message
55. Rethugs want $2 trillion in cuts for doing something the Constitution requires them to do?
Edited on Sun Jul-10-11 02:43 AM by No Elephants
And which they probably would have to do, even if the Constitution did not require it?

Is that correct?


(And is that photo from Photoshop?)


If Obama agrees to that, anyone who calls it a "compromise" is, IMO, a liar or a fool.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloomington-lib Donating Member (513 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
64. Boehner says broad debt deal unlikely
Source: Reuters

An effort to craft a broad deal of up to $4 trillion in deficit-reduction appeared out of reach on Saturday as Republican leader John Boehner cited differences with the White House on taxes and proposed pursuing a more modest package.

"Despite good-faith efforts to find common ground, the White House will not pursue a bigger debt reduction agreement without tax hikes," Boehner said in a statement. "I believe the best approach may be to focus on producing a smaller measure."

Boehner and Obama spoke by phone on Saturday.

Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/07/10/us-usa-debt-boehner-idUSTRE76903420110710
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #64
65. Oops, I was thinking today is Sunday. Okay, aren't they
Edited on Sat Jul-09-11 08:10 PM by gateley
scheduled to meet tomorrow? Is that "off the table" now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #64
66. translation -" Obama gives in every single time, I expect he will keep doing so"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #66
67. Are you and I reading the same article?
One Republican familiar with the discussions said both taxes and cuts in Social Security and Medicare were sticking points.

"The White House would not agree with the core elements of tax reform proposed by the speaker," the Republican source said. "A gulf also remains between the speaker and the White House on the issue of medium- and long-term structural reforms."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #67
75. What tax reform did the Speaker propose again?
Edited on Sun Jul-10-11 03:36 AM by No Elephants
AFAIK, Republicans are offering nothing, except what they have to do anyway, for 3 reasons:

1. The Constitution, as interpreted in a 1935 SCOTUS case.

2. Practical reality.

3. Public opinion.


They've been saying as much one at at time, when interviewed on national TV. The only thing they are saying is that August is not a real deadline.


Whatever Obama may give them in exchange for doing something they are going to do anyway would be too much.

His taking the Constitutional issue "off the table," just as Republicans were starting to acknowledge that it "might" obligate them to raise the debt ceiling was a big clue he wants the cuts as much as they do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yon_Yonson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #75
78. A-OK chicken shite boehner just remain NEOCON firm
I am at the point where I am just sick and gaw damn tired of listening to your whinny arse. You can’t lead so take yourself and prez obama out of the scene, both of your are as worthless as a hangover. SHUTE THE GOVERNMENT DOWN ... DO IT NOW! I believe that is the only way we are going to see any change in America is when we enter the CHAOS BREAKDOWN ZONE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberalynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #67
85. I will give credit where credit is due
Edited on Sun Jul-10-11 10:38 AM by Liberalynn
If it is true that taxes and SS and Medicare were the sticking points, then I give the President credit for sticking to his guns on the tax issue. Great job, Sir, now just Keep standing up to them.

However, I think it is Congress people like Bernie, who were the sticking points in regards to SS and Medicare cuts by way of messing with the COLA. So a credit and a huge thank you to them. Sorry for doubting you Congressional Dems, but the interview with Nancy Pelosi yesterday was scaring me into thinking that you were getting ready to cave. I truly believe the President would have gone through with messing with the COLA, if he and Boner, thought they had the votes for it.

I am still worried that the attack on SS and Medicare is far from over, but lets just hope it keeps meeting opposition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HankyDubs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #66
70. yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #66
74. Nice double-speak.
Well done. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #64
68. The Boehner goes smaller
Boehner pushes smaller debt-reduction deal -- CNN headline on google
http://www.cnn.com/2011/POLITICS/07/09/debt.talks/index.html?eref=mrss_igoogle_cnn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DallasNE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #64
69. So When Taxes, Social Security and Medicare
Are taken off the table, what is left that could produce $2T over 10 years? How much of that is defense -- otherwise it completely guts things like education.

The funny thing is that the last I heard Democrats were only going after loopholes and not a new rate for millionaires and billionairs. Another article said that the top 25 hedge fund managers had earnings of $22 billion. Their pay is a special class that a loophole treats as capital gains even though no actual stock is involved. That means that that income is taxed at 15%, which is the lowest tax rate. Treating this income as salary, which it really is, would make that $22 billion taxable at 35%. That alone would bring in nearly $4 billion but Boehner won't hear of this. Just as Boehner won't hear of removing the special tax treatment for corporate jets, oil company credits and other sweetheart deals only available to several hundred people/corporations each year. Why can several hundred people dictate tax policy for a hundred million people? It makes no sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #69
71. Elected representation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeBillClinton Donating Member (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #64
72. I think he's misunderestimating Obama's willingness to give stuff away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #64
73. The "good faith" line is total bullshit, okay?
Republicans don't compromise. The "good faith efforts" Boehner spoke of were a deal to balance the budget with no revenue increases, which even a blind man can see can't be done given the depth of the hole Bush dug. Obama is smart enough to realize not only that he'd lose 100 percent of his base by doing a deal like that, but that it wouldn't work in the first place.

So we're back to a 14th Amendment deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #73
76. Back to a 14th amendment deal? Obama took the 14th amendment "off the table."
the table And the 14th amendment deal would be the Republicans raising the debt ceiling in exchange for nothing. See Reply 11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #64
77. Classic political suicide, even base R's are ticked off at the...
Edited on Sun Jul-10-11 06:46 AM by rasputin1952
"Do Nothing Congress".

Recall that the GOP ran on "jobs", and instantaneously dropped that when they realized this would take actual work and legislation. They went after "entitlements" and social regression, painting themselves into a corner, the GOP imploded, (which is fine by me). Boehner has proven himself to be inept, and Cantor, as well as the other mice, have done nothing other than add to that assessment.

Boehner has marched up the scaffold, tied his own knot and placed it over his head, hell, he even bought the rope! Good riddance to this bum and his clown car GOP "leaders".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yon_Yonson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #64
79. A-OK chicken shite boehner just remain NEOCON firm
I am at the point where I am just sick and gaw damn tired of listening to your whinny arse. You can’t lead so take yourself and prez obama out of the scene, both of your are as worthless as a hangover. SHUTE THE GOVERNMENT DOWN ... DO IT NOW! I believe that is the only way we are going to see any change in America is when we enter the CHAOS BREAKDOWN ZONE!

(OOPS - posted twice, sorry about that)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
80. So the Republicans aren't THAT concerned about the deficit
We knew this already from their failed fiscal policies. Now they want to double-down on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimmydwight Donating Member (17 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
81. Why are they still calling the shots?
Why are all the news bites about him? What did Obama say? What are the Dems saying. It seems the Repubs are "Oh So Important".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeStateDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
82. Obama now appears to have lost control of the presidency ceding leadership to the pukes' Boner
Obama is now becoming irrelevant to the financial future of our country. He created this mess and has mishandled it from the beginning in extending Bush tax cuts and de-funding Social Security. He has allowed the pukes to dictate more than anytime in the recent history of the presidency with the pukes only controlling the House. The next Democrat up needs to explore a presidential challenge in 2012. Boner is becoming the de facto president by taking the initiative and dictating the agenda. Pathetic leadership by Obama, a failed presidency. I cannot recall ever in modern history that the debt-ceiling has be used to destroy a sitting president. Obama is suppose to be really smart, sorry but he is in overhead and taking the Democratic Party down with him. 2012 will be a even bigger disaster than 2010.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #82
87. "He created this mess and has mishandled it from the beginning" - fucking horseshit
yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eringer Donating Member (338 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
89. Time for the "Giant Gold Sell-Off of 2011"
Edited on Sun Jul-10-11 11:37 AM by eringer
That is it. Its time for the President to take action and show no mercy. Obama should immediately direct the Secretary of the Treasury to begin selling 25 percent of the gold reserves in Fort Knox. That should be enough to scare the far righty gold hoarders out of their minds when the price drops 40 to 60 percent. Sure they will be cursing Obama but will get relief only by telling their bought and paid for Congressmen to cut a deal with the President. Crisis averted, and even if does not, there is enough gold to move the debt ceiling 30 to 40 days past the August 2nd deadline. With all of their constiuents holding gold worth $140/oz. there wont be much left in their pockets to help their candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dotymed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
90. GOP 1000...........,Democrats 0
Can't President Obama pass an executive order, without the GOP screwing us out of anything, that raises the debt ceiling?

That would be a decisive, sane act on his part. Then (if he wants to), he can go on tee vee and inform Americans why he felt compelled to do this.

The "people" love a decisive President and in this case, it just makes sense. Don't let obstructionists destroy America and the social contract that all (non-wealthy) citizens need. Explain it just that way. I realize it is not "flying" a fighter jet onto a ship to say "Mission Accomplished." but, to me, it is the logical thing to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
N7Shepard Donating Member (191 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #90
91. Too early to do that. Let the republicans show themselves to be the fools they are first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 06:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC